Article

Cultural Orientation and Attitudes Toward Different Forms of Whistleblowing: A Comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U.K.

Journal of Business Ethics (Impact Factor: 0.96). 10/2008; 82(4):929-939. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9603-1
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This article reports the findings of a cross-cultural study that explored the relationship between nationality, cultural orientation,
and attitudes toward different ways in which an employee might blow the whistle. The study investigated two questions – are
there any significant differences in the attitudes of university students from South Korea, Turkey and the U.K. toward various
ways by which an employee blows the whistle in an organization?, and what effect, if any, does cultural orientation have on
these attitudes? In order to answer these questions, the study identified six dimensions of whistleblowing and four types
of cultural orientation. The survey was conducted among 759 university students, who voluntarily participated; 284 South Korean,
230 Turkish, and 245 U.K. Although all three samples showed a preference for formal, anonymous and internal modes of whistleblowing,
there were significant variations related to nationality and cultural orientation. The findings have some key implications
for organizational practice and offer directions for future research.

Full-text

Available from: John Blenkinsopp, Jun 11, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
228 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to determine effect of teachers’ idealism and relativism value orientations to their preference for whistle-blowing. Sample was included 277 teachers work at public secondary schools in Marmara region in Turkey. 62% was women and 38% was men. The data was collected through two scales; ‘Attitudes to different types of whistle-blowing questionnaire’ and ‘Ethic Position Questionnaire’. Results revealed that the teachers have idealism more than relativism, and they prefer internal and identified whistle-blowing. The hypothesis related to external whistle-blowing could not be tested. Results revealed that there was no relationship between idealism and relativism and preference of anonymous whistleblowing. Most studies examining whistle-blowing have been conducted in Western cultures. Some authors emphasized to the importance of studying whistle-blowing in the other cultures. Thus, this paper aimed to contribute to the extant literature by choosing Turkey and education context. / (whistle-blowing) tercihlerine etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmaya Türkiye’de Marmara bölgesindeki kamu orta öğretim okullarında görev yapmakta olan 277 öğretmen örneklem olarak seçilmiştir. Katılımcıların %62’si kadın, %38’i erkektir. Araştırma için veri ‘Farklı Türde Bilgi Uçurma Tutumları Anketi’ ve ‘Etik Durum Ölçeği’ ile elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmenlerin idealizm etik değere, görecelikten daha yüksek düzeyde sahip olduğu; içe ve kimliğini açıklayarak bilgi uçurmayı tercih ettiği belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada dışa bilgi uçurmaya yönelik geliştirilen hipotezler test edilememiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, idealizm ve görecelik etik değerin anonim bilgi uçurma tercihi ile ilişkisinin bulunmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bilgi uçurma konusunda genelde Batı kültürlerinde araştırma yapılmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, bu tür çalışmaların diğer kültürlerde de yapılması gereği özelikle bazı araştırmacılar tarafından vurgulanmıştır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmanın hem Türkiye’de gerçekleşmiş olması, hem de eğitim alanını incelemesi bakımından alan yazına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Discussions of whistleblowing whether in academic literature or in more popular media have tended to very one-sided assessments of the moral worth of the act. Indeed, much of the current literature concentrates on psychological or managerial aspects of whistleblowing while taking for granted this or that moral position or eschewing any normative commitment on the question. The purpose of this article is firstly to reemphasise the importance and complexity of the normative foundations of whistleblowing acts; and secondly, through a moral philosophical analysis of the component decisions that make up any act of whistleblowing, to contribute to a more balanced and less polarised treatment of the topic. It is argued that the polarisation of views on the topic is in part due to a failure to decompose the act of whistleblowing into a number of inevitable component moral decisions leading up to the act. It is furthermore argued on the basis of the analysis that it is impossible to state a priori as a matter of general principle that whistleblowing is always morally right (a good act) or morally wrong (a bad act). The article will close with a reflection on the degree to which the weighing up of good and bad in the act of whistleblowing differs sharply among cultures; and with a conjecture as to a possible relation to a people's history which may serve as a pointer to interesting future empirical research on the topic.
    Business Ethics A European Review 07/2014; 23(4). DOI:10.1111/beer.12058 · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the influence of an observer’s value orientation and personality type on attitudes toward whistleblowing. Based on a review of the literature we generated three hypotheses to explain the relationship between these two factors and attitudes toward whistleblowing, and these were tested using data collected from 490 university students in South Korea. The survey comprises two parts, a measure of MBTI personality types, and a section assessing value orientations and attitudes toward whistleblowing. Regression analysis was conducted to clarify the influence of the independent variables. The study offers two main contributions. First, it examines what role an observer’s value orientation and personality type play in determining the attitudes. Second, it provides insights into designing customized ethical training programs and developing policy aimed at changing negative attitudes toward whistleblowing.
    Journal of Business Ethics 03/2014; 120(1). DOI:10.1007/s10551-013-1908-7 · 0.96 Impact Factor