Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography of the hand

Journal of Digital Imaging (Impact Factor: 1.1). 08/1998; 11(3):121-125. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168735

ABSTRACT We evaluated the clinical utility of high data compression for computed radiography (CR) of the hand. Paired original and
compressed CR images were obtained using an FCR 9000 system in 35 patients with various abnormalities of the hand. For the
paired original and compressed images, we compared the depiction of the bone cortex, bone trabeculae, soft-tissue, and the
margin of the abnormalities. The overall impressions for detectability of the abnormalities and for diagnostic capability
were also evaluated. Poorer image quality of the compressed images was noted for most of the structures, but there was no
significant difference between the original and compressed images as for the overall impressions for detectability of the
abnormalities or for diagnostic capability. We conclude that a high data compression may be clinically acceptable with caution
in radiography of the hand.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of MPEG-2 compression scheme on coronary angiography and to search the highest compression ratio at which no significant effect to accuracy of assessment of stenosis severity occurs. Forty-Four digital cine angiographies were used. Three cardiologists participated in a subjective study in which they read both uncompressed images and compressed images. Furthermore, an objective study was carried out to measure vessel stenosis ratio by using software. The influence of compression was evaluated by kappa statistics in case of subjective study and by both systematic error and random error in case of objective study. Kappa statistics between uncompressed image and compressed image at a ratio of 80:1 was significantly lower than that of other compression ratios such as 40:1. Similar results were obtained in objective evaluation. In this report, the authors provide the baseline for further studies on observer performance for motion images.
    Journal of Digital Imaging 01/2003; 15(4):210-5. · 1.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to compare the effect of JPEG 2000 compression of hand-wrist radiographs on observer image quality qualitative assessment and to compare with a software-derived quantitative image quality index. Fifteen hand-wrist radiographs were digitized and saved as TIFF and JPEG 2000 images at 4 levels of compression (20:1, 40:1, 60:1, and 80:1). The images, including rereads, were viewed by 13 orthodontic residents who determined the image quality rating on a scale of 1 to 5. A quantitative analysis was also performed by using a readily available software based on the human visual system (Image Quality Measure Computer Program, version 6.2, Mitre, Bedford, Mass). ANOVA was used to determine the optimal compression level (P < or =.05). When we compared subjective indexes, JPEG compression greater than 60:1 significantly reduced image quality. When we used quantitative indexes, the JPEG 2000 images had lower quality at all compression ratios compared with the original TIFF images. There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.92) between qualitative and quantitative indexes. Image Quality Measure indexes are more sensitive than subjective image quality assessments in quantifying image degradation with compression. There is potential for this software-based quantitative method in determining the optimal compression ratio for any image without the use of subjective raters.
    American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 06/2007; 131(5):679-88. · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this literature review was to explore the research conducted to date on the use of irreversible compression in digital diagnostic radiology.The degree of research on the use of irreversible compression in digital radiology is still in its infancy, since the technologies for digital radiology are still evolving. However, 90 papers reviewed address research examining the use of various compression ratios on image quality and observer performance on several detection tasks such as identifying structures and lesion detection, on chest, CT, skeletal, angiography, mammography, MRI, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, and teleradiology images.In general the results of these studies show that image types in digital radiology are different based on their mode of generation, as well as their spatial and contrast resolution, determined by their matrix size/pixel size, and bit depth, respectively. Furthermore, there are several forms of irreversible compression algorithms, and they are not all equal in terms of performance. Additionally, of the three evaluation methods used to measure observer performance on compressed images, the ROC methodology is most commonly used.Some types of images such as digitized chest images, CT, MRI and ultrasound images have different “compression tolerance” and therefore a single compression ratio cannot be assigned to a modality, even for a given organ system. Chest images for example can be compressed at ratios as high as 10:1–20:1 using CR and DR without compromising image quality. Other image types such as CT images for example, can be compressed at ratios as high as 20:1 in the detection of coronary artery calcification. The results of these studies would appear to indicate that image compression in digital radiology would have to be optimized based on the types of images being generated, interpreted for primary diagnosis, stored, and transmitted to remote sites for clinical review by physicians other than radiologists.
    Radiography. 01/2006;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014