Article

Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography of the hand

Journal of Digital Imaging (Impact Factor: 1.2). 08/1998; 11(3):121-125. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168735

ABSTRACT We evaluated the clinical utility of high data compression for computed radiography (CR) of the hand. Paired original and
compressed CR images were obtained using an FCR 9000 system in 35 patients with various abnormalities of the hand. For the
paired original and compressed images, we compared the depiction of the bone cortex, bone trabeculae, soft-tissue, and the
margin of the abnormalities. The overall impressions for detectability of the abnormalities and for diagnostic capability
were also evaluated. Poorer image quality of the compressed images was noted for most of the structures, but there was no
significant difference between the original and compressed images as for the overall impressions for detectability of the
abnormalities or for diagnostic capability. We conclude that a high data compression may be clinically acceptable with caution
in radiography of the hand.

0 Followers
 · 
84 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the image display of a web-based teleradiology system that uses a common web browser and has no need of proprietary applets, plug-ins, or dedicated software for DICOM display. The teleradiology system (TS) is connected to the Internet by ADSL and to radiological modalities using the DICOM standard with TCP/IP. Images were displayed on a PC through Internet connection with the remote TS using a common web browser. MS lesion number and volume in T1- and T2-weighted images (T1w and T2w, respectively) of 30 brain MR studies were quantified using both the TS and a conventional software. Wilcoxon signed ranks test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the variability and concordance between intra- and inter-observer and TS and conventional DICOM viewer, setting significance at p < 0.05. No significant differences in T1w and T2w volumes between the TS and the conventional software were found by either operator. The ICC results showed a high level of inter-operator agreement in volume estimation in T1w and T2w images using the two systems. Quantitative assessment of MS lesion volumes in T1w and T2w images with a user interface of a teleradiology system that allows the consultation by means of a common web browser, without the need for proprietary plug-ins, applets, or dedicated software for DICOM display showed no significant differences from, and almost complete agreement with, conventional DICOM viewers.
    Journal of Digital Imaging 07/2009; 23(5):632-8. DOI:10.1007/s10278-009-9222-8 · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Efficient data compression is essential for practical daily operation of computed radiography (CR) systems. In this study the clinical applicability of type III irreversible high data compression using an FCR 9501 chest unit (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan) was evaluated. Sixty-eight normal and 93 various abnormal cases, with an additional 15 cases of lung cancers with solitary lung nodules, were selected from the file. A pair of hard copies of original images and images reconstructed using type III compression was made for each case. Six radiologists evaluated the image quality by visual rating and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. For all five anatomic regions of normal cases, "original equal to compressed" was the most common response, followed by "original significantly better than compressed." When abnormal cases were evaluated for diagnostic information, there was no significant difference between the compressed and original images. ROC curve analysis on lung nodules with lung cancer showed no significant difference between the two. Compressed CR images using the type III irreversible technique are clinically applicable and acceptable despite slight degradation of image quality.
    Journal of Digital Imaging 12/1998; 11(4):176-81. DOI:10.1007/BF03178080 · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this literature review was to explore the research conducted to date on the use of irreversible compression in digital diagnostic radiology.The degree of research on the use of irreversible compression in digital radiology is still in its infancy, since the technologies for digital radiology are still evolving. However, 90 papers reviewed address research examining the use of various compression ratios on image quality and observer performance on several detection tasks such as identifying structures and lesion detection, on chest, CT, skeletal, angiography, mammography, MRI, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, and teleradiology images.In general the results of these studies show that image types in digital radiology are different based on their mode of generation, as well as their spatial and contrast resolution, determined by their matrix size/pixel size, and bit depth, respectively. Furthermore, there are several forms of irreversible compression algorithms, and they are not all equal in terms of performance. Additionally, of the three evaluation methods used to measure observer performance on compressed images, the ROC methodology is most commonly used.Some types of images such as digitized chest images, CT, MRI and ultrasound images have different “compression tolerance” and therefore a single compression ratio cannot be assigned to a modality, even for a given organ system. Chest images for example can be compressed at ratios as high as 10:1–20:1 using CR and DR without compromising image quality. Other image types such as CT images for example, can be compressed at ratios as high as 20:1 in the detection of coronary artery calcification. The results of these studies would appear to indicate that image compression in digital radiology would have to be optimized based on the types of images being generated, interpreted for primary diagnosis, stored, and transmitted to remote sites for clinical review by physicians other than radiologists.
    Radiography 02/2006; DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2005.04.002

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
29 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014