Predicting disposition following brief residence at a shelter for battered women

Wayne State University
American Journal of Community Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.74). 01/1981; 9(5):559-566. DOI: 10.1007/BF00896476

ABSTRACT Despite the recent proliferation of community shelters designed specifically to serve battered women, remarkably few evaluation studies have been conducted to determine the subsequent disposition of women following brief residence at these agencies. In particular, whether or not a woman returns to live with her assailant has far-reaching implications for the type of counseling services she requires as a shelter resident. From data available at admission, the current study employs discriminant function analysis for maximizing prediction of a battered woman's living arrangements 6 weeks following discharge. Results of the analysis improve the prediction of living arrangements from a 52°7o rate of accuracy using base rates alone to an 80% rate of accuracy using discriminant function coefficients. Implications for the development of more effective service delivery and for future research are discussed. It has been only recently that domestic violence and wife-abuse in particular have been recognized as a social problem of epidemic proportions. In the United States in any one year, approximately 1.8 million wives are beaten by their husbands. Nearly 30°70 of all couples report experiencing a violent incident at least once in the course of their marriage; estimates of actual incidence of physical abuse in marriages run closer to 50 to 60°70 (Straus, 1977-78). By 1978, some 100 shelters had been established as a refuge for battered women, and their number has grown steadily since (McShane, 1979).

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Domestic violence is defined as assaultive behavior involving adults who are married, cohabitating, or who have an ongoing prior intimate relationship (Goolkasian, 1986). Due to the very private nature of this act, incidences of domestic assaults are less likely to come to the attention of police than are other crimes and therefore to be included in the official crime counts (Berk et al., 1984; Dutton, 1987; Hirschel et al., 1992). However, results from a number of wellregarded national studies (Straus and Gelles, 1986; Tjaden and Thoennes, 2000) indicate just how pervasive this problem continues to be.
    12/2006: pages 131-145;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Domestic violence severely decreases women's health and well-being, thus the question of why many battered women stay with their abusive mates is puzzling. I offer possible evolutionary logic behind battered women's decision to stay, by suggesting hitherto unrecognized potential reproductive benefits of staying in abusive relationships. The logic suggests that battered women should have more sons than daughters. A recent study indeed suggests that battered women may have more sons than other women. THE PUZZLE Domestic violence against women reduces their health and well-being tremendously. According to the National Violence Against Women Survey in the United States (TJADEN and THOENNES 2000, p. 26), 22.1% of a large (n = 8,000) representative sample of women have been victimized by their intimate partners at least once in their lifetimes. This means that 22.3 million women over 18 suffer from domestic violence in the United States, 1.6% (or 1.3 million women) in any given year. Forty-two percent of these women sustain some injury, ranging from scratches and bruises to broken bones and dislocated joints to knife and bullet wounds (p. 49). Occasionally, of course, women are killed by their abusive mates.
    Journal of Evolutionary Psychology. 01/2008; 61007:1789-2082.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The following review represents an update and extension to an influential article (see [Strube, M.J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236-250.]), which evaluated empirical research and suggested potential theories to explain victimized women's decisions to terminate violent relationships. In contrast to the original review, this paper provides information on the importance of and means by which theory should be evaluated and critically determines which theoretical approach(es) might be most productive based on theoretical and atheoretical evidence. In addition, this paper discusses strengths and weaknesses of each approach, in light of certain criteria deemed to be important for the evaluation of theory (e.g., comprehensiveness, parsimony, etc.). Furthermore, this paper discusses current controversies regarding these issues, ramifications of differing theoretical approaches, and their potential impact on the field. Based on this analysis, it is determined that general approaches (e.g., reasoned action/planned behavior, investment model) may be better for understanding this complex and multifaceted decision. Suggestions for future theoretical and intervention research are discussed.
    Clinical Psychology Review 06/2006; 26(3):321-45. · 7.18 Impact Factor