Article

Screening of a specific monoclonal antibody against and detection ofListeria monocytogenes whole cells using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor

Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering (Impact Factor: 1.22). 12(2):80-85. DOI: 10.1007/BF03028630

ABSTRACT In this study, a specific monoclonal antibody againstListeria monocytogenes was screened using an SPR biosensor Monoclonal antibodies were bound to protein L, after which theL. monocytogenes cells were subjected to an affinity assay. Protein L was immobilized on a carboxymethyl dextran (CM-Dex) surface via an amine
coupling method and utilized repeatedly by regeneration. The monoclonal antibody, ‘A18’, was selected and employed for the
high-sensitivity detection ofL. monocytogenes. Under optimized conditions, 103 cells/ml or 50 cells were detected by the SPR biosensor.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The “Bottom-up” approach for implementing nano/microstructure using biological self-assembled systems has been investigated with tremendous interest by many researchers in the field of medical diagnostics, material synthesis, and nano/microelectronics. As a result, the techniques for achieving these systems have been extensively explored in recent years. The developed or developing techniques are based on many interdisciplinary areas such as biology, chemistry, physics, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and so on. In this paper, we review the fundamentals behind the self-assembly concepts and describe the state of art in the biological and chemical self-assembled systems for the implementation of nano/microstructures. These structures described in the paper can be applied to the implementation of hybrid biosensors, biochip, novel bio-mimetic materials, and nano/microelectronic devices.
    Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 12(3):185-199. · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique is widely used for efficient detection of food-borne pathogens because of speed and specificity. However, PCR methods have focused mostly on species-specific detection. In the present work, we describe a PCR-based method for the simultaneous detection of all Vibrio species because lots of them are notorious food-borne human pathogens. We then combined this total detection method with specific detection of Vibrio cholerae pathogen. Using a degenerate primer set based on the sequence of the potassium uptake gene, trkA, we were able to successfully detect all Vibrio species. Specific detection of V. cholerae was also possible using primer sets based on putative flagellin sequence. Importantly, simultaneous total and species-specific Vibrio detection was possible using all two primer sets in a multiplexed PCR strategy. Thus, the PCR method we have developed is applicable to both simultaneous and two-step detection of total and specific Vibrio species.
    Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 11/2009; 162(4):1187-94. · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been identified as a significant biomarker for prostate cancer screening. Heavily-doped porous silicon, etched to form a Fabry-Perot fringe pattern, can be applied to an interferometric sensing for detecting PSA bound with PSA-antibody. In the previous works, a calyx crown derivative (Prolinker-A) was used as an alternative biolinker on the porous silicon surface for interferometric biosensing of DNA-damaging chemical instead of employing the conventional biomolecular affinity method using biotin, which resulted in a denser linker formation. In this study, G5 amineterminated PAMAM (poly amidoamine) dendrimer as a biolinker, was applied to an interferometric sensing of PSA by using porous silicon, which shows the enhancement of adhesion capability and increase of functional groups more than those with Prolinker-A. Considerably low level down to 1 ng/mL of PSA could be detected by this sensing system.
    Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 01/2009; 14(1):6-12. · 1.22 Impact Factor