Structure of graphene on the Ni(110) surface

Physics of the Solid State (Impact Factor: 0.82). 09/2011; 53(9):1952-1956. DOI: 10.1134/S1063783411090101


The structure of graphene on Ni(110) was studied using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and low-energy electron diffraction
spectroscopy. STM images show a Moire structure, depending on the orientation of the domains making up the graphene layer.
A simple model has been proposed which permits prediction of the Moire structure and interpretation of STM images based on
calculation of the distances between the nearest neighbor carbon and nickel atoms. Our theoretical calculation suggests that
the final orientation of graphene domains forming in the course of synthesis is defined by the angle of rotation of small
clusters in the initial stages of growth.

Download full-text


Available from: Dmitry Usachov, Jul 28, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Graphene on nickel is a prototypical example of an interface between graphene and a strongly interacting metal, as well as a special case of a lattice matched system. The chemical interaction between graphene and nickel is due to hybridization of the metal d-electrons with the π-orbitals of graphene. This interaction causes a smaller separation between the nickel surface and graphene (0.21 nm) than the typical van der Waals gap-distance between graphitic layers (0.33 nm). Furthermore, the physical properties of graphene are significantly altered. Main differences are the opening of a band gap in the electronic structure and a shifting of the π-band by ∼2 eV below the Fermi-level. Experimental evidence suggests that the ferromagnetic nickel induces a magnetic moment in the carbon. Substrate induced geometric and electronic changes alter the phonon dispersion. As a consequence, monolayer graphene on nickel does not exhibit a Raman spectrum. In addition to reviewing these fundamental physical properties of graphene on Ni(111), we also discuss the formation and thermal stability of graphene and a surface-confined nickel-carbide. The fundamental growth mechanisms of graphene by chemical vapor deposition are also described. Different growth modes depending on the sample temperature have been identified in ultra high vacuum surface science studies. Finally, we give a brief summary for the synthesis of more complex graphene and graphitic structures using nickel as catalyst and point out some potential applications for graphene-nickel interfaces.
    Nanoscale 01/2014; 6(5). DOI:10.1039/c3nr05279f · 7.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Graphene has become the focus of research recently due to its properties. Various methods have been proposed for the synthesis of graphene, and chemical vapour deposition (CVD) appears to be the most promising route for synthesising large-area graphene. Use of Ru, Ir, Ni, or Co lead to a segregation growth procedure, in which carbon dissolves into the bulk metals at a high temperature and segregates to form graphene after reaching the carbon saturation, and the graphene expand with carpet growth mode. For Cu catalyst, the formation of graphene can be explained by the surface growth model, in which carbon aggregates at the surface of Cu to form graphene. Graphene are formed at different mechanism on different crystalline facets for Pt, Ni and Cu. Meanwhile Ru(0 0 0 1) and Ir(1 1 1) only suitable for graphene formation for respective metals. This review discusses the fundamental mechanisms of the synthesis of graphene from various transition metals under various circumstances through a CVD process and concludes by addressing the challenges involved in large-scale graphene synthesis and the reuse of the catalysts.
    Carbon 04/2014; 70:1–21. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.073 · 6.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present an angle-resolved electron-energy-loss study of the graphene/Ni(110) system. The dispersion curve of the π plasmon, compared with that obtained for graphene synthesized on the Ni(111) surface, shows that in both systems the nature of the oscillating charge at the interface is confined in a two-dimensional layer, but in the case of graphene grown on Ni(110) the interaction with the substrate is weaker. We assign this behavior to a weaker graphene-nickel hybridization in the case of Ni(110), due to the lack of long range matching between the two-dimensional lattices of graphene and nickel.
    Surface Science 08/2014; 626:40. DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2014.03.005 · 1.93 Impact Factor