Chapter

Structural Violence and Structural Vulnerability Within the Risk Environment: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives for a Social Epidemiology of HIV Risk Among Injection Drug Users and Sex Workers

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2138-8_10

ABSTRACT The transmission of HIV is shaped by individual-environment inter­actions. Social epidemiologic approaches thus seek to capture
the dynamic and reciprocal relationships of individual-environment interactions in the production and reduction of risk. This
presents considerable methodological, theoretical and disciplinary challenges. Drawing upon four research case studies, we
consider how methods and concepts in the social and epidemiologic sciences might be brought together towards understanding
HIV risk as an effect of social, cultural and political condition. The case studies draw upon different combinations of methods
(qualitative, ethnographic and quantitative) and disciplines (sociology, anthropology and epidemiology) in different social
contexts of HIV vulnerability (street settings in Russia, Serbia and North America and a cross-border setting in Mexico) among
a range of marginalised high-risk populations (injection drug users and female and transvestite sex workers). These case studies
illustrate the relevance of the social science concepts of “structural violence” and “structural vulnerability” for a social
epidemiology of HIV risk. They also explore how social epidemiologic work can benefit from the mixing of social science methods
and theories. We contend that social epidemiology cannot advance in its understanding of structural vulnerability without
embracing and relying upon ethnographic and qualitative approaches. We put ­forward the linked concepts of “structural violence,”
“structural vulnerability” and “risk environment” as building blocks for a theory-informed social epidemiology of HIV risk
among marginalised populations.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Steffanie A Strathdee, Jul 05, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
118 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Partner communication about HIV sexual risk behaviors represents a key area of epidemiologic and social importance in terms of infection acquisition and potential for tailored interventions. Nevertheless, disclosing sexual risk behaviors often presents myriad challenges for marginalized couples who engage in stigmatized behaviors. Using qualitative data from a social epidemiology study of risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among female sex workers and their intimate, non-commercial male partners along the Mexico-U.S. border, we examined both partners' perspectives on sex work and the ways in which couples discussed associated HIV/STI risks in their relationship. Our thematic analysis of individual and joint interviews conducted in 2010 and 2011 with 44 couples suggested that broader contexts of social and economic inequalities profoundly shaped partner perspectives of sex work. Although couples accepted sex work as an economic contribution to the relationship in light of limited alternatives and drug addiction, it exacted an emotional toll on both partners. Couples employed multiple strategies to cope with sex work, including psychologically disconnecting from their situation, telling "little lies," avoiding the topic, and to a lesser extent, superficially discussing their risks. While such strategies served to protect both partners' emotional health by upholding illusions of fidelity and avoiding potential conflict, non-disclosure of risk behaviors may exacerbate the potential for HIV/STI acquisition. Our work has direct implications for designing multi-level, couple-based health interventions.
    Social Science [?] Medicine 06/2013; 87:1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.010 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research with injection drug users (IDUs) benefits from interdisciplinary theoretical and methodological innovation because drug use is illegal, socially sanctioned and often hidden. Despite the increasing visibility of interdisciplinary, mixed methods research projects with IDUs, qualitative components are often subordinated to quantitative approaches and page restrictions in top addiction journals limit detailed reports of complex data collection and analysis logistics, thus minimizing the fuller scientific potential of genuine mixed methods. We present the methodological logistics and conceptual approaches of four mixed-methods research projects that our interdisciplinary team conducted in San Francisco with IDUs over the past two decades. These projects include combinations of participant-observation ethnography, in-depth qualitative interviewing, epidemiological surveys, photo-documentation, and geographic mapping. We adapted Greene et al.'s framework for combining methods in a single research project through: data triangulation, methodological complementarity, methodological initiation, and methodological expansion. We argue that: (1) flexible and self-reflexive methodological procedures allowed us to seize strategic opportunities to document unexpected and sometimes contradictory findings as they emerged to generate new research questions, (2) iteratively mixing methods increased the scope, reliability, and generalizability of our data, and (3) interdisciplinary collaboration contributed to a scientific "value added" that allowed for more robust theoretical and practical findings about drug use and risk-taking.
    The International journal on drug policy 01/2013; 24(2). DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.12.004 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article we discuss the findings from a grounded theory study in which we explored how women residing in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES) minimized some of the physical, psychological, and interpersonal harms associated with crack cocaine use, and identify the social, economic, and political factors that influence safer use. Data were collected over a 3-month period and involved group interviews with 27 women at an agency run by drug users in the DTES. A preliminary theory of safer crack use is discussed, consisting of the central phenomenon of caring for self and others. In addition, four thematic processes are described: (a) establishing a safe physical space, (b) building trusting relationships, (c) learning about safer crack use, and (d) accessing safer equipment. Implications of the findings are discussed in relation to supporting women's efforts and improving health outcomes.
    Qualitative Health Research 12/2012; DOI:10.1177/1049732312469465 · 2.19 Impact Factor