Article

Spatial division of labour of Schoenoplectus americanus

Forest Research Alice Holt Lodge Wrecclesham, Farnham Surrey GU10 4LH UK
Plant Ecology (Impact Factor: 1.53). 01/2008; 199(1):55-64. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-008-9411-4
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT If connected ramets are growing in heterogeneous environments, Division of Labour (DoL) among ramets potentially will result
in more efficient sharing of resources and an overall benefit to the plants. As a result of DoL, connected ramets growing
in a heterogeneous environment might achieve more biomass than ramets growing in a homogeneous environment. DoL has been demonstrated
to occur in a few clonal plant species, although most studies simply focussed on biomass allocation, not on actual resource
capturing such as water and nutrient consumption. The model system for our study is one in which two connected ramet groups
of Schoenoplectus americanus were placed into contrasting environments. In one treatment, the connected ramets grew in heterogeneous environments and
in the other treatment, the connected ramets grew in the same (i.e. homogeneous) environment. We manipulated two variables
(light and salinity) in the experiment. We hypothesized that ramets growing in a shaded and fresh water condition in a heterogeneous
environment would use more water than ramets growing in a similar condition but in a homogeneous environment. We further hypothesized
that ramets growing in a light and saline condition in a heterogeneous environment would assimilate less water than ramets
growing in a similar condition but in a homogeneous environment. These hypotheses are based on the assumption that ramets
in a heterogeneous environment would translocate water from ramets growing in a shaded and fresh water condition to ramets
growing in a light and saline water condition. We also hypothesized that ramets growing in heterogeneous environments achieve
larger biomass than ramets in homogeneous environments. Ramets grown in light and saline conditions in heterogeneous environments
allocated more biomass to aboveground parts, had taller shoots, larger Specific Green (leaf) Area and consumed less water
than ramets grown in similar conditions but in a homogeneous environment. Results confirm the hypothesis that connected ramets
in heterogeneous environments are specialised to capture locally abundant resources and share these with connected ramets
growing in other habitats. The result of DoL is that the entire connected ramet system benefits and achieves higher biomass.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
81 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When growing in reciprocal patches in terms of availability of different resources, connected ramets of clonal plants will specialize to acquire and exchange locally abundant resources more efficiently. This has been termed division of labour. We asked whether division of labour can occur physiologically as well as morphologically and will increase with patch contrasts. We subjected connected and disconnected ramet pairs of Potentilla anserina to Control, Low, Medium and High patch contrast by manipulating light and nutrient levels for ramets in each pair. Little net benefit of inter-ramet connection in terms of biomass was detected. Shoot-root ratio did not differ significantly between paired ramets regardless of connection under Control, Low and Medium. Under High, however, disconnected shaded ramets with ample nutrients showed significantly larger shoot-root ratios (2.8∼6.5 fold) than fully-lit but nutrient-deficient ramets, and than their counterparts under any other treatment; conversely, fully-lit but nutrient-deficient ramets, when connected to shaded ramets with ample nutrients, had significantly larger shoot-root ratios (2.0∼4.9 fold) than the latter and than their counterparts under any other treatment. Only under High patch contrast, fully-lit ramets, if connected to shaded ones, had 8.9% higher chlorophyll content than the latter, and 22.4% higher chlorophyll content than their isolated counterparts; the similar pattern held for photosynthetic capacity under all heterogeneous treatments. Division of labour in clonal plants can be realized by ramet specialization in morphology and in physiology. However, modest ramet specialization especially in morphology among patch contrasts may suggest that division of labour will occur when the connected ramets grow in reciprocal patches between which the contrast exceeds a threshold. Probably, this threshold patch contrast is the outcome of the clone-wide cost-benefit tradeoff and is significant for risk-avoidance, especially in the disturbance-prone environments.
    PLoS ONE 01/2011; 6(9):e25401. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Predicting exotic invaders and reducing their impacts on the biodiversity and function of native ecosystems require understanding of the mechanisms that facilitate their success during key stages of invasion. We determined whether clonal growth, characteristic of the majority of successful invaders of natural areas, facilitates the proliferation of Bromus inermis (smooth brome), an exotic grass invading prairie ecosystems across the Great Plains. By manipulating the below-ground connections of proliferating rhizomes as well as the levels of soil nitrogen along the margins of clones invading northern fescue prairies in Manitoba, Canada, we hypothesized that physiological integration would most benefit ramets invading low resource environments. Severing clonal connections reduced the mass of smooth brome shoots invading native prairies and was exacerbated by the immobilization of soil nutrients with glucose. Clonal connections were equally important in the maintenance of smooth brome density and the horizontal proliferation of ramets. Our results demonstrate the role of physiological integration in the proliferation of a clonal exotic invader and may help explain the success of clonal invaders in other regions. Although integration among invading ramets suggests several possibilities for successful management, future research must continue to elucidate differences in the invasiveness of native versus exotic species as well as the persistence of clonal connections among exotic invaders.
    Plant Ecology 01/2008; 199(2):235-242. · 1.53 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from