Exclusive ρ0 electroproduction on the proton at CLAS

Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María 110-V Casilla Valparaíso Chile
European Physical Journal A (Impact Factor: 2.74). 12/2008; 39(1):5-31. DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2008-10683-5


The ep → e

pρ0 reaction has been measured using the 5.754GeV electron beam of Jefferson Lab and the CLAS detector. This represents the largest
ever set of data for this reaction in the valence region. Integrated and differential cross-sections are presented. The W , Q2 and t dependences of the cross-section are compared to theoretical calculations based on the t -channel meson-exchange Regge theory, on the one hand, and on quark handbag diagrams related to Generalized Parton Distributions
(GPDs) on the other hand. The Regge approach can describe at the » \approx 30% level most of the features of the present data while the two GPD calculations that are presented in this article which
succesfully reproduce the high-energy data strongly underestimate the present data. The question is then raised whether this
discrepancy originates from an incomplete or inexact way of modelling the GPDs or the associated hard scattering amplitude
or whether the GPD formalism is simply inapplicable in this region due to higher-twists contributions, incalculable at present.

Download full-text


Available from: Mher Aghasyan, Oct 10, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The HERMES collaboration has recently published a set of (correlated) beam charge, beam spin and target spin relative asymmetries for the Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering process. This reaction allows in principle to access the Generalized Parton Distributions of the nucleon. We have fitted, in the QCD leading-order and leading-twist handbag approximation, but in a model independent way, this set of data and we report our results for the extracted Compton Form Factors. In particular, we are able to extract constrains on the $H$ GPD. Comment: 8 pages, 5 figures The difference between v2 and v1 is only ref.11 which contained a typo and which has been corrected
    European Physical Journal A 05/2009; 42(1). DOI:10.1140/epja/i2009-10840-4 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spin Density Matrix Elements (SDMEs) describing the angular distribution of exclusive ρ 0 electroproduction and decay are determined in the HERMES experiment with 27.6 GeV beam energy and unpolarized hydrogen and deuterium targets. Eight (fifteen) SDMEs that are related (unrelated) to the longitudinal polarization of the beam are extracted in the kinematic region 1<Q 2<7GeV2, 3.0<W<6.3GeV, and −t<0.4 GeV2. Within the given experimental uncertainties, a hierarchy of relative sizes of helicity amplitudes is observed. Kinematic dependences of all SDMEs on Q 2 and t are presented, as well as the longitudinal-to-transverse ρ 0 electroproduction cross-section ratio as a function ofQ 2. A small but statistically significant deviation from the hypothesis of s-channel helicity conservation is observed. An indication is seen of a contribution of unnatural-parity-exchange amplitudes; these amplitudes are naturally generated with a quark-exchange mechanism.
    European Physical Journal C 08/2009; 62(4):659-695. DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1082-3 · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Around θπ=90°, the coupling to the ρ0N channel leads to a good accounting of the charged pion exclusive photoproduction cross section in the energy range 3<Eγ<10 GeV, where experimental data exist. Starting from a Regge pole approach that successfully describes vector meson production, the singular part of the corresponding box diagrams (where the intermediate vector meson–baryon pair propagates on-shell) is evaluated without any further assumptions (unitarity). Such a treatment provides an explanation of the s−7 scaling of the cross section. Elastic rescattering of the charged pion improves the basic Regge pole model at forward and backward angles.
    Physics Letters B 12/2009; 685(2-685):146-150. DOI:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.01.052 · 6.13 Impact Factor
Show more