Above and Below the Water: Social/Ecological Transformation in Northwest Newfoundland

Population and Environment (Impact Factor: 1.46). 06/2004; 25(6):195-215. DOI: 10.1023/B:POEN.0000032322.21030.c1

ABSTRACT Marine fisheries and fishing societies develop around the resources provided by a particular ecosystem. As they exploit these resources, fisheries transform the ecosystem, which pushes fishery and society to adapt in turn. This process is illustrated by fisheries, ecological and social data tracking dramatic changes on Newfoundland's Northern Peninsula and its adjacent marine ecosystem, the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence. There a longstanding fishery for cod and other groundfish collapsed in the 1990s, and was replaced by fisheries targeting invertebrates. The new invertebrate fisheries have different socioeconomic characteristics than the former groundfish fisheries. The shift in target species reflects deep ecological changes that were underway at least a decade before official recognition of the crisis. Our analysis of biological data reveals that the main ecological changes occurred during the glory years of the 1980s, when Newfoundland's domestic fisheries were at their peak. Overfishing and interactions with adverse climatic conditions drove the changes. As the ecosystem transformed, human population declined due to outmigration, and social indicators show signs of distress. Accounts by outport residents paint a generational picture of social change.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article presents issues and challenges associated with collecting social indicator data in the context of northern commercial fisheries. The Arctic Observing Network Social Indicators Project (AON-SIP) fisheries domain database consists of geo-coded social indicator datasets from Alaska, Iceland, Norway, and Chukotka, of place/year catch, landings, employment, and permit data from 1980-present for commercially important species above 60°N and in the Bering Sea. Comparability of indicator data across regions will be important for the future monitoring and modeling of the effects of changes in the arctic environment such as those influenced by diminishing sea ice cover and increasing ocean acidification which will impact fisheries production and distribution. Equally important, the collection and analysis of time-series social indicator data could aid in understanding how arctic residents experience the processes of globalization as they participate in industries such as fisheries that are increasingly dominated by non-local corporations. Because of this extrinsic control of resources, social indicator data reflecting local ownership in fisheries rights and revenues could be functional in understanding how changes in fisheries impact arctic livelihoods. It is also necessary to understand how changes in fisheries fit within a broader resource use and arctic development context, for example, in conjunction with the oil and gas industry. Finally, planning for arctic fisheries of the future will be dependent upon data collection and analysis activities that can inform management plans and governance structures accommodating international boundary conflicts, rights-based management regimes, indigenous access, and organization/oversight of arctic marine science initiatives.
    Polar Geography 03/2011; 34(1-2):87-105.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present essay attempts to address the observed complex crisis of aquaculture and fisheries sectors within the broader context of global crisis, using examples of significant negative effects on natural and social environment. At the same time the underlying causes of the sectors’ crisis are viewed under the lens of metabolic rift theory, applied to shrimp farming, glass eel trade and tuna fishing and farming for sushi. Current crisis in the Greek aquaculture sector is briefly reviewed as a representative example of aquaculture developmental process in western societies, followed by an attempt to address the emergence of organic aquaculture schemes. Finally, eco-sound directions and polices in aquaculture development are briefly discussed, in order to minimize environmental effects, social inequity and partially restore existing metabolic rifts.
    Interciencia 01/2011; 36(1):76-80. · 0.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sustainable management of fisheries is often compromised by management delaying implementation of regulations that reduce harvest, in order to maintain higher catches in the short-term. Decreases or increases in fish population growth rate driven by environmental change, including ecosystem and climate change, affect the harvest that can be taken sustainably. If not acted on rapidly, environmental change could result in unsustainable fishing or missed opportunity for higher catches. Using simulation models of harvested fish populations influenced by environmental change, we explore how long fisheries managers can afford to wait before changing harvest regulations in response to changes in population growth. If environmental change causes population declines, delays greater than five years increase the probability of population collapse. Species with fast and highly variable population growth rates are more susceptible to collapse under delays and should be a priority for revised management where delays occur. Generally, the long-term cost of delay, in terms of lost fishing opportunity, exceeds the short-term benefits of overfishing. Lowering harvest limits and monitoring for environmental change can alleviate the impact of delays; however, these measures may be more costly than reducing delays. We recommend that management systems that allow rapid responses to population growth changes be enacted for fisheries management to adapt to ecosystem and climate change.
    Ecological Applications 01/2012; 22(1):298-310. · 3.82 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014