RADAR: Finding Analogies Using Attributes of Structure

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45750-X_3

ABSTRACT RADAR is a model of analogy retrieval that employs the principle of systematicity as its primary retrieval cue. RADAR was
created to address the current bias toward semantics in analogical retrieval models, to the detriment of structural factors.
RADAR recalls 100% of structurally identical domains. We describe a technique based on “derived attributes” that captures structural descriptions
of the domain’s representation rather than domain contents. We detail their use, recall and performance within RADAR through empirical evidence. We contrast
RADAR with existing models of analogy retrieval. We also demonstrate that RADAR can retrieve both semantically related and
semantically unrelated domains, even without a complete target description, which plagues current models.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A theory of analogy must describe how the meaning of an analogy is derived from the meanings of its parts. In the structure-mapping theory, the interpretation rules are characterized as implicit rules for mapping knowledge about a base domain into a target domain. Two important features of the theory are (a) the rules depend only on syntactic properties of the knowledge representation, and not on the specific content of the domains; and (b) the theoretical framework allows analogies to be distinguished cleanly from literal similarity statements, applications of abstractions, and other kinds of comparisons. Two mapping principles are described: (a) Relations between objects, rather than attributes of objects, are mapped from base to target; and (b) The particular relations mapped are determined by systematicity, as defined by the existence of higher-order relations.
    Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary Journal 04/1983; 7(2-7):155-170. · 2.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Case-based reasoning (CBR) focuses on analogy in the context of solving real-world problems. Its research methodology of computational modeling is aimed at deriving hypotheses about cognition. CBR's computational models show the roles of encoding, retrieval, and adaptation in analogical reasoning processes. In addition, its algorithms provide insight into what it might take to enhance human cognition. CBR as a plausible cognitive model can thus advise on educational philosophy, educational practice, and design of educational software.
    American Psychologist 02/1997; 52(1):57-66. · 6.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a model of similarity-based retrieval which attempts to capture three psychological phenomena: (1) people are extremely good at judging similarity and analogy when given items to compare. (2) Superficial remindings are much more frequent than structural remindings. (3) People sometimes experience and use purely structural analogical remindings. Our model, called MAC/FAC (for "many are called but few are chosen") consists of two stages. The first stage (MAC) uses a computationally cheap, non-structural matcher to filter candidates from a pool of memory items. That is, we redundantly encode structured representations as content vectors, whose dot product yields an estimate of how well the corresponding structural representations will match. The second stage (FAC) uses SME to compute a true structural match between the probe and output from the first stage. MAC/FAC has been fully implemented, and we show that it is capable of modeling patterns of access found...

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014