Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development

The Annals of Regional Science (Impact Factor: 1.03). 01/2010; 44(3):467-491. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-008-0278-z

ABSTRACT This paper uses data for 255 NUTS-2 European regions over the period 1995–2003 to test the relative explanatory performance
of two important rival theories seeking to explain variations in the level of economic development across regions, namely
the neoclassical model originating from the work of Solow (Q J Econ 70:65–94, 1956) and the so-called Wage equation, which
is one of a set of simultaneous equations consistent with the short-run equilibrium of new economic geography (NEG) theory,
as described by Fujita etal. (The spatial economy. Cities, regions, and international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999).
The rivals are non-nested, so that testing is accomplished both by fitting the reduced form models individually and by simply
combining the two rivals to create a composite model in an attempt to identify the dominant theory. We use different estimators
for the resulting panel data model to account variously for interregional heterogeneity, endogeneity, and temporal and spatial
dependence, including maximum likelihood with and without fixed effects, two stage least squares and feasible generalised
spatial two stage least squares plus GMM; also most of these models embody a spatial autoregressive error process. These show
that the estimated NEG model parameters correspond to theoretical expectation, whereas the parameter estimates derived from
the neoclassical model reduced form are sometimes insignificant or take on counterintuitive signs. This casts doubt on the
appropriateness of neoclassical theory as a basis for explaining cross-regional variation in economic development in Europe,
whereas NEG theory seems to hold in the face of competition from its rival.

JEL ClassificationC33-O10

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper focuses on the estimation and predictive performance of several estimators for the dynamic and autoregressive spatial lag panel data model with spatially correlated disturbances. In the spirit of Arellano and Bond (1991) and Mutl (2006), a dynamic spatial GMM estimator is proposed based on Kapoor, Kelejian and Prucha (2007) for the Spatial AutoRegressive (SAR) error model. The main idea is to mix non-spatial and spatial instruments to obtain consistent estimates of the parameters. Then, a linear predictor of this spatial dynamic model is derived. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compare the performance of the GMM spatial estimator to that of spatial and non-spatial estimators and illustrate our approach with an application to new economic geography.
    Oxford Bulletin of Economics &amp Statistics 01/2014; 76(1). · 0.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Empirical evidence about income convergence among regions and countries is inconclusive and it is necessary to clarify the economic and institutional conditions for convergence. We investigate movements in the income distribution among regions in an integrated market with high mobility of labor, capital, knowledge and technology - municipalities and economic regions in Norway. Large and persistent population flows from the periphery towards urban centers characterize the economic development. The convergence towards a narrower unimodal distribution of per capita income is convincing in this homogenous institutional setting. Kernel density functions and finite first order Markov chains are estimated and tested, in particular with respect to the role of migration. Interestingly, migration seems to be unimportant for the convergence process, at odds with the recent emphasis on agglomeration effects and divergence. The population flows to urban centers do not generate growth processes where the income level in cities takes off compared to the periphery. The convergence process is slow, however, and the evolving regional income pattern seems to reflect differences in permanent regional factors.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper develops a general equilibrium geographical economics model which uses matching frictions on the labor market to generate regional unemployment disparities alongside the usual core-periphery pattern of industrial agglomeration. In the model, regional wage differentials do not only influence migration decisions of mobile workers, but also affect the bargaining process on local labor markets, leading to differences in vacancies and unemployment as well. In a setting with two regions, both higher or lower unemployment rates in the core region are possible equilibrium outcomes, depending on transport costs and the elasticity of substitution. Stylized facts suggest that both patterns are of empirical relevance.
    The Annals of Regional Science 50(3). · 1.03 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 6, 2014