Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development

The Annals of Regional Science (Impact Factor: 1.03). 01/2010; 44(3):467-491. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-008-0278-z

ABSTRACT This paper uses data for 255 NUTS-2 European regions over the period 1995–2003 to test the relative explanatory performance
of two important rival theories seeking to explain variations in the level of economic development across regions, namely
the neoclassical model originating from the work of Solow (Q J Econ 70:65–94, 1956) and the so-called Wage equation, which
is one of a set of simultaneous equations consistent with the short-run equilibrium of new economic geography (NEG) theory,
as described by Fujita etal. (The spatial economy. Cities, regions, and international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999).
The rivals are non-nested, so that testing is accomplished both by fitting the reduced form models individually and by simply
combining the two rivals to create a composite model in an attempt to identify the dominant theory. We use different estimators
for the resulting panel data model to account variously for interregional heterogeneity, endogeneity, and temporal and spatial
dependence, including maximum likelihood with and without fixed effects, two stage least squares and feasible generalised
spatial two stage least squares plus GMM; also most of these models embody a spatial autoregressive error process. These show
that the estimated NEG model parameters correspond to theoretical expectation, whereas the parameter estimates derived from
the neoclassical model reduced form are sometimes insignificant or take on counterintuitive signs. This casts doubt on the
appropriateness of neoclassical theory as a basis for explaining cross-regional variation in economic development in Europe,
whereas NEG theory seems to hold in the face of competition from its rival.

JEL ClassificationC33-O10


Available from: Bernard Fingleton, May 29, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Empirical evidence about income convergence among regions and countries is inconclusive and it is necessary to clarify the economic and institutional conditions for convergence. We investigate movements in the income distribution among regions in an integrated market with high mobility of labor, capital, knowledge and technology - municipalities and economic regions in Norway. Large and persistent population flows from the periphery towards urban centers characterize the economic development. The convergence towards a narrower unimodal distribution of per capita income is convincing in this homogenous institutional setting. Kernel density functions and finite first order Markov chains are estimated and tested, in particular with respect to the role of migration. Interestingly, migration seems to be unimportant for the convergence process, at odds with the recent emphasis on agglomeration effects and divergence. The population flows to urban centers do not generate growth processes where the income level in cities takes off compared to the periphery. The convergence process is slow, however, and the evolving regional income pattern seems to reflect differences in permanent regional factors.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The human capital and creative class hypotheses argue that the agglomeration of skilled and creative people is key to economic growth. Migration is assumed to play an important role in forming these agglomerations. However, the results of this study indicate that while younger cohorts of skilled and creative individuals are highly mobile, skilled and creative couples are highly immobile. This research hypothesizes that it is these relatively immobile skilled and creative couples that are behind the link between urban growth and concentrations of skill and creativity. Indeed, this analysis finds a strong empirical link between concentrations of skilled couples, but not creative class couples, and economic growth. Public policies designed to increase the size of the skilled population should be directed at retaining younger cohorts long enough for them to develop the local networks upon which spillover effects rely.
    Urban Geography 02/2014; 35(2):219-235. DOI:10.1080/02723638.2013.860754 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last 15 years, China has embarked on a massive expansion of its road network system, the centerpiece of which is the building of a 41,000 km National Expressway Network (NEN). As an integral part of China's "Go West" policy, the construction of this network is intended to assist in the catch-up of its lagging inland regions with its prosperous Eastern ones. This is in addition to its more general aim of contributing to national productivity and growth. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the aggregate and spatial economic impacts of the NEN. It adopts a counterfactual approach based on a structural new economic geography model in a methodology which combines econometric estimation with both GIS and simulation techniques. As such, this methodology represents an initial and innovative step towards making theoretical models of economic geography operational for impact evaluation purposes. Overall, we find that aggregate Chinese real income was approximately 6 percent higher than it would have been in 2007 had the NEN not been built. We do not find strong evidence of a reduction in disparities across prefectural level regions or of a reduction in urban-rural disparities. If anything, and contrary to its objectives, the NEN appears to have reinforced existing patterns of spatial inequality.