Article

Correlates of Self-reported Attachment (In)security in Children: The Role of Parental Romantic Attachment Status and Rearing Behaviors

Journal of Child and Family Studies (Impact Factor: 1.42). 01/2008; 17(4):555-566. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-007-9174-x

ABSTRACT We investigated the influence of self-reported parental romantic attachment status and rearing behaviors on children’s self-reported
attachment (in)security towards father and mother in a sample of 237 non-clinical children aged 9–12. All children and their
parents completed a single-item measure of attachment style. The parents further completed an index of their authoritative,
authoritarian, and permissive rearing behaviors. Results showed that the attachment status of the father was significantly
related to the child’s attachment style to the father. Further, children who portray themselves as insecurely attached to
their fathers have fathers with lower average authoritative scores compared to children who are securely attached to their
fathers. In examining the relative contribution of attachment style and rearing behaviors of the parents, insecure attachment
status of the father was still significantly related to insecure attachment style of the child but the effect of authoritative
rearing behaviors of the father on attachment (in)security of children was not statistically significant anymore. Altogether,
these results support the notion that attachment status of the father was most substantially associated with self-reported
insecure attachment of children.

2 Followers
 · 
153 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the relationship between mother’s parental rearing style and the quality of attachment of school-age children, and advances a model to predict the security of attachment behavior. The sample comprises 93 mothers of school-aged children who completed the EMBU-P, to assess the perception of their rearing style, and the PCV-M to assess perception of their children’ attachment behavior. The results indicate that rejection and emotional support are the dimensions of maternal behavior that most influence, albeit in opposite directions, the security of the attachment behavior among school-aged children.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A teoria da vinculação pressupõe que o indivíduo tem a necessidade (básica) de desenvolver vínculos emocionais ao longo da sua vida. Este processo inicia-se durante o primeiro ano de vida do bebé ao estabele-cer um vínculo privilegiado com a figura que assegura a sua segurança e proteção. Assim, um postulado da teoria da vinculação é que o bebé tem, desde muito cedo, a capacidade para estimular os cuidados e a atenção das potenciais figuras cuidadoras e, consequentemente, de pro-mover o investimento parental (Bowlby 1984). Mas a presença de uma relação de vinculação é diferente da análise da qualidade dessa relação de vinculação (Ungerer e McMahon 2005; Weinfield, Sroufe, Egeland e Carlson 1999). Além disso, a segurança ou insegurança da vinculação não deverão ser consideradas características da criança, mas antes o reflexo de uma relação particular entre a criança e a figura vincular de referência (Ainsworth, Blehar e Waters 1978; Soares 2002), uma vez que esta relação é coconstruída pela figura de vinculação e pela criança (So-ares 2007). Deste modo, a teoria da vinculação pressupõe que os pais que são cuidadores emocionalmente apoiantes, afetuosos, sensíveis e responsi-vos promovem uma vinculação segura com os seus filhos, com conse-quências desenvolvimentais positivas (Bowlby 1984). Apesar de a teoria da vinculação desenvolver essencialmente o es-tudo da sensibilidade materna, tem sido reconhecida a importância de estudar as práticas educativas específicas e os estilos educativos que os Interações número 20. pp. 75-99. © do Autor 2011 75 pais utilizam na educação dos seus filhos, na medida em que podem ajudar a explicar a qualidade da vinculação da criança, bem como al-gumas das associações entre a vinculação e o desenvolvimento infantil (Minzi 2006; De Wolff e Ijzendoorn 1997; Kerns, Aspelmeier, Gentzler e Grabill 2001; Kerns, Tomich e Kim 2006). No entanto, é escassa a litera-tura sobre a relação entre a vinculação da criança e os estilos educativos parentais (Karavasilis, Doyle, e Markiewicz 2003; Roelofs, Meesters e Muris 2008).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This work aims to highlight the relevance of Stephenson’s Q methodology (QM) for improving the assessment of child–father attachment relationships. We argue that reconceptualising the relationship can enhance the validity of assessment techniques and help in identifying the paternal behaviours that predict a secure child–father attachment pattern. To this end, we first review the inconclusive and sometimes contradictory findings about links among paternal behaviours, child–father security of attachment, and socio‐emotional well‐being. Second, the methodological challenges in assessing child–father interactions and relationships are outlined. Finally, with the help of empirical evidence, theoretical perspectives, and observational data gathered from child–father interactions, we substantiate the use of QM in conceptualising and assessing child–father attachment relationships.
    Early Child Development and Care 01/2010; 180:71-85. DOI:10.1080/03004430903414711