Article

Development and Validation of the Clutter Image Rating

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (Impact Factor: 1.55). 01/2008; 30(3):193-203. DOI: 10.1007/s10862-007-9068-7

ABSTRACT Few instruments are available to assess compulsive hoarding and severity of clutter. Accuracy of assessment is important to
understanding the clinical significance of the problem. To overcome problems associated with over- and under-reporting of
hoarding symptoms, the clutter image rating (CIR) was developed. This pictorial scale contains nine equidistant photographs
of severity of clutter representing each of three main rooms of most people’s homes: living room, kitchen, and bedroom. The
psychometric properties of this measure were examined in two studies. Internal consistency, test–retest, and interobserver
reliabilities were good and convergent validity with other questionnaire and interview measures was also good. The CIR correlated
more strongly with measures of clutter than with other hoarding and psychopathology scales. The CIR’s very brief pictorial
assessment method makes it useful in clinical and treatment contexts for measuring the clutter dimension of compulsive hoarding.

8 Followers
 · 
806 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonostante le ricerche si siano prevalentemente concentrate sulla ruminazione depressiva, negli ultimi anni nella letteratura scientifica sono emerse delle evidenze sull’esistenza di altre forme di ruminazione, come quella rabbiosa. La ruminazione rabbiosa è un processo cognitivo negativo e perseverativo costituito da attenzione focalizzata su episodi passati che hanno indotto rabbia e sulle cause e le conseguenze di tali eventi. Tale forma di pensiero è responsabile dell’aumento e del mantenimento della rabbia. È stato dimostrato come il protrarsi di emozioni di rabbia porti a manifestare comportamenti aggressivi. Negli ultimi anni le ricerche hanno ipotizzato un’implicazione della ruminazione rabbiosa nella genesi e nel mantenimento di alcuni aspetti problematici in psicopatologia e specialmente nel Disturbo Borderline di Personalità (DBP). Questo articolo ha lo scopo di passare in rassegna i principali studi che hanno preso in considerazione la ruminazione rabbiosa al fine di fornire una descrizione del costrutto, dei suoi correlati cognitivi, emotivi e comportamentali, delle sue implicazioni nella psicopatologia cognitiva.
    Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale 10/2013; 19(3):341-354.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Background: The recent addition of hoarding disorder (HD) to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders, 5th edition, has highlighted the dearth of information about the demographic, sociologic, and medical predictors of HD severity, particularly in older adults. Although there have been several previous studies examining the characteristics of older adults with HD, and one investigation of psychiatric correlates of hoarding symptom severity in non-clinical older adults, there has been little investigation about which characteristics predict hoarding symptom severity in older adults with HD. Methods: Participants were 71 older adults who were enrolled for one of the two studies of HD at the VA San Diego Healthcare System between January 2010 and January 2014. Results: There were multiple differences in the predictive ability of patient characteristics between the more cognition-related symptoms of HD and the more concrete measure of clutter, including gender-based differences and anxiety severity. Further, married participants were more likely to report lower hoarding severity, and there was no significant relationship between hoarding severity and intervention attempts or hoarding and reported falls in the past three years. Conclusions: Multiple predictive factors have been presented, which may result in further studies to investigate possible predictive differences in cognition and clutter symptoms of HD. Future studies should examine the possibility of the predictive factors also identified to be moderators of treatment outcomes.
    International Psychogeriatrics 08/2014; DOI:10.1017/S1041610214001677 · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Effective management of Hoarding Disorder (HD) must begin with assessment of the severity of hoarding symptoms and functional impairment. We sought to validate the UCLA Hoarding Severity Scale (UHSS), a semi-structured, clinician-administered rating scale that measures the severity of both the core symptoms of HD and the associated features of indecisiveness, perfectionism, task prolongation, and procrastination, which are significantly associated with the diagnosis and impairment of HD. Hoarding symptom severity was measured in 62 patients who met DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for HD and 65 normal controls, using the UHSS and the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R), a well validated self-report measure of hoarding symptoms. The UHSS showed significant internal consistency (Cronbach׳s α=.70). Principal components analysis revealed three factors that accounted for 58% of the variance: 1) associated features and functional impairment, 2) clutter volume and social impairment, and 3) difficulty discarding, urges to save, and excessive acquisition. UHSS and SI-R scores were significantly correlated. UHSS and SI-R total and factor scores of HD patients were all significantly different from those of controls. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were not assessed. The initial version of the UHSS did not contain rater instructions, so it lacked quantifiable anchor points for ratings. The UHSS showed internal consistency, construct validity, convergent validity, and known groups discriminant validity. The UHSS validly measures the core symptoms, associated features, and functional impairment of patients with HD. Utilizing a valid clinician-administered scale will provide a more comprehensive and accurate clinical assessment of patients with HD. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 01/2015; 175C:488-493. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.030 · 3.71 Impact Factor