Article

The importance of human needs during peacetime, retrospective peacetime, and the Persian Gulf War

International Journal of Stress Management (Impact Factor: 1.28). 12/1996; 4(1):47-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF02766072

ABSTRACT Study 1 investigated the importance of human needs during peacetime in 1993 using a sample of 137 full-time workers in several
industries in the United States. Study 2 examined the importance of needs in 1990 (retrospective peacetime) and in 1991 (during
the Persian Gulf War)(both measured during the war) using a sample of 564 college students in the United States. In both studies,
two levels of needs (higher-order and lower-order needs) were identified during peacetime. Study 2 revealed that during the
war, all needs were rated as more important and only one factor was identified. During peacetime, the safety of one’s own
life was significantly more important than the safety of the country which was rated as the least important need. During the
war, the safety of the country was as important as the safety of one’s own life. Students who had spouse, family members,
and friends in the Middle East during Desert Storm differed significantly from those who did not in war-related stress and
the importance of several needs.

3 Followers
 · 
91 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here is the link to our paper: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-015-2553-0 Abstract Research suggests that organizational justice (procedural, distributive, and interactional justice) has important impacts on work-related attitudes and behaviors, such as organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). In this article, we explore the extent to which individualism moderates the relationship between organizational justice and OCB (organizational obedience, participation, and loyalty) among citizens in Kyrgyzstan. We make additional contributions to the literature because we know very little about these constructs in this former Soviet Union country, Kyrgyzstan, an under-researched and under-represented region of the world. Results of our data collected from 402 managers and employees in Kyrgyzstan offer the following new discoveries. All three justice constructs are related to OCB. Individualism moderates only the distributive and interactive justice to OCB relationships. We develop an intricate theory with provocative implications: Procedural justice produces obedience. For “individualists”, interactional justice inspires loyalty and, interestingly, distributive justice “can only buy” participation, but “can’t buy” loyalty. Therefore, for individualists, interactional justice outweighs distributive justice for organizational loyalty. Based on Kyrgyz citizens’ justice, OCB, and individualism, our theory reveals novel insights regarding culture, money attitude, and intrinsic motivation and provides critical and practical implications to the field of business ethics.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-015-2553-0 Research suggests that organizational justice (procedural, distributive, and interactional justice) has important impacts on work-related attitudes and behaviors, such as organizational citizenship behavior (OCB, organizational obedience, participation, and loyalty). In this article, we explore the extent to which individualism moderates the relationship between organizational justice and OCB among citizens in Kyrgyzstan. We make additional contributions to the literature because we know very little about these constructs in this former Soviet Union country, Kyrgyzstan, an under-researched and under-represented region of the world. Results of our data collected from 402 managers and employees in Kyrgyzstan offer the following new discoveries. All three justice constructs are related to OCB. Individualism moderates only the distributive and interactive justice to OCB relationships. We develop an intricate theory with provocative implications: Procedural justice “produces” obedience. For “individualists”, interactional justice “inspires” loyalty and, interestingly, distributive justice “can only buy” participation, but “can’t buy” loyalty. Based on Kyrgyz citizens’ justice, OCB, and individualism, our theory reveals novel insights regarding culture, money attitude, and intrinsic motivation and provides critical and practical implications to the field of business ethics.
    Journal of Business Ethics 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2553-0 · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite of numerous studies, scant literature was found on the relationship of distributive justice with OCB via mediating role of LMX especially in educational setting of Pakistan. In this context, the main purpose of this study is to examine whether or not leader-member exchange (LMX) act as mediating variable in the relationship of distributive justice – organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) of the faculty members. Data was collected from 452 faculty members serving in different public and private sector universities / degree awarding institutes accredited by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. Baron and Kenny (1986) regression model was to assess the role of mediating variable. Results showed that LMX partially mediates the relationship of distributive justice – OCB. Implication for researchers and policy makers of public and private sector universities were discussed.

Full-text

Download
94 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014