Article

Bone Adhesives in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery

University of Gießen—Marburg Department of Trauma Surgery Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7 35385 Gießen Germany Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7 35385 Gießen Germany
European Journal of Trauma 03/2006; 32(2):141-148. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-006-6040-2

ABSTRACT Adhesives, especially bone adhesives, are resorbed and degraded to non-toxic products after fulfilling their function in contact
with the living organism. The use of such bone adhesives has found growing interest in all fields of medicine in the last
50 years. The dream of trauma and orthopedic surgeons for alternatives to osteosynthesis and pins is reflected in the development
of a variety of surrogates of biological or synthetic origin. Despite a longstanding history of research in this field up
to now a clinically applicable alternative could not have been found on the field of bone gluing. The application consistently
collapsed, because these adhesives were not tailored to the conditions met within the living organism. The following article
is meant to provide an overview of the development, the state of the art and today’s knowledge of bone adhesives. In addition,
the article wants to pinpoint the tremendous progress made on this subject, made possible by the joint effort of basic researchers
and surgeons. The results show that in the future a successful reconstructive surgery will emerge from the application of
synthetic biomaterials.

0 Followers
 · 
267 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nature's inspiration is a promising tool to design new biomaterials especially for frontier technological areas such as tissue engineering and nanomedicine. Polyurethanes (PURs) are a flexible platform of materials that can be designed to fit the requirements imposed by their final applications. The choice of their building blocks (which are used in the synthesis as macrodiols, diisocyanates, and chain extenders) can be implemented to obtain biomimetic constructs, which can mimic the native tissue in terms of mechanical, morphological and surface properties. In bone tissue engineering, elastomeric PURs avoid shear forces at the interface between bone and the implant, supporting the proliferation of osteogenic cells. Soft tissues can be engineered equally efficiently by PURs, which have been reported to be reliable candidates in the fabrication of muscle constructs (including heart, blood vessels, cartilage and peripheral nerve regeneration). This review summarizes the recent progress in the biomedical applications of polyurethanes. After introducing the concept of biomimetics (paragraph 2), the use of PURs in the engineering of hard tissues (para. 3.1), soft tissues (para. 3.2) and in nanomedicine (para. 4) is reported. Taken collectively, reports in the literature clearly indicate the potential of PURs to complement or substitute alternative, FDA approved, degradable polymers, such as those belonging to the polyester family, in the replacement of damaged tissues or organs, as well as in the emerging field of nanomedicine, where they might show superior drug encapsulation efficiency and enhanced capability to target specific tissue compartments.
    07/2014; 2(32). DOI:10.1039/C4TB00525B
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Each year millions of people sustain traumatic or surgical wounds, which require proper closure. Conventional closure techniques, including suturing and stapling, have many disadvantages. They inflict additional damage on the tissue, elicit inflammatory responses and have a relatively long application time. Especially for the more demanding wounds, where fluids or gasses are to be sealed off, these techniques are often insufficient. Therefore, a large variety of tissue adhesives, sealants and hemostatic agents has been developed. This review provides an overview of such tissue adhesive materials from a polymer chemistry perspective. The materials are divided into synthetic polymer-based, polysaccharide-based and protein-based adhesives. Their specific properties and behavior are discussed and related to their clinical application. Though each type has its specific advantages, yet few have become standard in clinical practice. Biomimetic based adhesives and other novel products have shown promising results but also face specific problems. For now, the search for better adhering, stronger, easier applicable and cheaper adhesives continues and this review is intended as starting point and inspiration for these future research efforts to develop the next generation tissue adhesives.
    Progress in Polymer Science 07/2014; 39(7). DOI:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.001 · 26.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bone and tissue adhesives are common and beneficial supplements to standard methods of musculoskeletal tissue suture repair. Knowledge and development of biologically derived or inspired adhesives useful in orthopedic surgery are rapidly advancing. Recent literature demonstrates the increased adjunct or primary use of biological adhesives in the repair of musculoskeletal soft tissues, chondral fractures, and osteochondral fractures. Adhesives offer more benefits and enhancements to tissue healing than current fixation methods afford, including improved biocompatibility, resorbability, and nonimmunogenicity. Further investigation is required to determine the extent of the role that these bioadhesives can play in orthopedic surgery. The largest group of biologically derived adhesives and sealants is fibrin sealants, which include first- and second-generation commercially available fibrin sealants, autologous fibrin sealants, and variants. Other groups include gelatin-resorcin aldehydes, protein-aldehyde systems, collagen-based adhesives, polysaccharide-based adhesives, mussel adhesive proteins, and various biologically inspired or biomimetic glues. Potential uses include applications in orthopedic-related blood conservation, arthroplasty, articular cartilage disorders, sports medicine, spine surgery, trauma, and tumors. The development of an adhesive with universal application is likely unfeasible, given the unique characteristics of various musculoskeletal tissues. However, the literature demonstrates the overall underuse of adhesives and indicates the rising probability of the development of a successful variety of bioadhesives for use in orthopedic surgery.
    Orthopedics 12/2013; 36(12):945-56. DOI:10.3928/01477447-20131120-09 · 0.98 Impact Factor