Article

A System-wide Intervention to Improve HIV Testing in the Veterans Health Administration

UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles CA USA
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 08/2008; 23(8):1200-1207. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0637-6

ABSTRACT BackgroundAlthough the benefits of identifying and treating asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals are firmly established, health care
providers often miss opportunities to offer HIV-testing.

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether a multi-component intervention increases the rate of HIV diagnostic testing.

DesignPre- to post-quasi-experiment in 5 Veterans Health Administration facilities. Two facilities received the intervention; the
other three facilities were controls. The intervention included a real-time electronic clinical reminder that encourages HIV
testing, and feedback reports and a provider activation program.

PatientsPersons receiving health care between August 2004 and September 2006 who were at risk but had not been previously tested for
HIV infection

MeasurementsPre- to post-changes in the rates of HIV testing at the intervention and control facilities

ResultsAt the two intervention sites, the adjusted rate of testing increased from 4.8% to 10.8% and from 5.5% to 12.8% (both comparisons,
p < .001). In addition, there were 15 new diagnoses of HIV in the pre-intervention year (0.46% of all tests) versus 30 new
diagnoses in the post-intervention year (0.45% of all tests). No changes were observed at the control facilities.

ConclusionsUse of clinical reminders and provider feedback, activation, and social marketing increased the frequency of HIV testing and
the number of new HIV diagnoses. These findings support a multimodal approach toward achieving the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention’s goal of having every American know their HIV status as a matter of routine clinical practice.

Full-text

Available from: Herschel Knapp, Jun 13, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
126 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We are in a new era of partner-based implementation research, and we need clear strategies for how to navigate this new era. Drawing on principles from community-based participatory research, the Clinical Public Health group of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the HIV/Hepatitis Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (HHQUERI) forged a longstanding partnership that has improved the care of Veterans with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus. An exemplar HIV testing project epitomizes this partnership and is discussed in terms of the lessons learned as a result of our high level of collaboration around design, analysis, implementation, and dissemination across projects over the past several years. Lessons learned through this partnered testing program involve respecting different time horizons among the partners, identifying relevant research questions for both parties, designing flexible studies, engaging all partners throughout the research, and placing an emphasis on relationship building at all times. These lessons and strategies can benefit others conducting partner-based research both within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and in other integrated healthcare systems.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11606-014-3017-4 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasing the use of routine preventive care such as HIV testing is important, yet implementation of such evidence-based clinical care is complex. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) model for implementation posits that implementation will be most successful when the evidence, context, and facilitation strategies are strong for the clinical practice. We evaluated the relative importance of perceived evidence, context, and facilitation of HIV testing during the implementation of a multimodal intervention in US Department of Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. A multimodal intervention including clinical reminders (CRs), academic detailing-providing education sessions for providers-and social marketing to improve HIV testing was implemented in 15 VA primary care clinics in three regions. We conducted qualitative formative and process evaluations using semi-structured interviews with HIV lead clinicians, primary care lead clinicians, nurse managers, and social workers. Interviews were analyzed thematically to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of HIV testing and how these were addressed by the intervention. Sites were then rated high, medium, or low on the dimensions of perceived evidence and the context for testing. We then assessed the relationship of these ratings to improvements in HIV testing rates found in earlier quantitative analyses. Sites that showed greatest improvements in HIV testing rates also rated high on evidence and context. Conversely, sites that demonstrated the poorest improvements in testing rates rated low on both dimensions. Perceptions of evidence and several contextual aspects resulted in both barriers and facilitators to implementing testing. Evidence barriers included provider perceptions of evidence for routine testing as irrelevant to their population. Contextual barriers included clinical reminder overload, insufficient resources, onerous consent processes, stigma, provider discomfort, and concerns about linking individuals who test positive to HIV treatment. While most barriers were ameliorated by the intervention, HIV stigma in particular regions and concerns about linkage to care persisted. Interventions to implement evidence-based practices such as HIV testing can be successful when utilizing proven quality improvement techniques. However, it is critical to address providers' perceptions of evidence and consider aspects of the local context in order to fully implement new routine clinical practices such as HIV testing.
    Implementation Science 12/2015; 10(1). DOI:10.1186/s13012-015-0214-4 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on the successful pilot implementation of a Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) aimed at increasing HIV testing throughout four local facilities and their associated satellite clinics, we expanded our efforts to deploy our methods to substantially more sites spanning six states. Our goal was to implement and examine the cost effectiveness of a distance-learning model to offer provider education to geographically remote (sub)facilities. We developed and implemented an equivalent interactive online version of our in-person presentation. Handouts were shipped to each site before the day of the in-service. Remote participants were receptive to this cost-effective form of provider activation. The technology functioned dependably; no presentation anomalies were encountered. Participants rated in-person presentations higher than online, however, mean scores for both methods were >80%. Online presentations were found to be considerably more affordable than in-person. These findings suggest that this alternate approach may offer a feasible alternative for a variety of subjects.
    Journal for Healthcare Quality 09/2011; 33(5):17-24. DOI:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00117.x