Analysis of farm performance in Europe under different climatic and management conditions to improve understanding of adaptive capacity

Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (RIVM/MNP) P.O. Box 1 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands
Climatic Change (Impact Factor: 4.62). 09/2007; 84(3):403-422. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9242-7

ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to improve understanding of the adaptive capacity of European agriculture to climate change. Extensive
data on farm characteristics of individual farms from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) have been combined with climatic
and socio-economic data to analyze the influence of climate and management on crop yields and income and to identify factors
that determine adaptive capacity. A multilevel analysis was performed to account for regional differences in the studied relationships.
Our results suggest that socio-economic conditions and farm characteristics should be considered when analyzing effects of
climate conditions on farm yields and income. Next to climate, input intensity, economic size and the type of land use were
identified as important factors influencing spatial variability in crop yields and income. Generally, crop yields and income
are increasing with farm size and farm intensity. However, effects differed among crops and high crop yields were not always
related to high incomes, suggesting that impacts of climate and management differ by impact variable. As farm characteristics
influence climate impacts on crop yields and income, they are good indicators of adaptive capacity at farm level and should
be considered in impact assessment models. Different farm types with different management strategies will adapt differently.

Download full-text


Available from: P. Reidsma, Jul 07, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The economic effects of climate change on agriculture have been widely assessed in the last two decades. Many of these assessments are based on the integration of biophysical and agro-economic models, allowing to understand the physical and socio-economic responses of the agricultural sector to future climate change scenarios. The evolution of the bio-economic approach has gone through different stages. This review analyses its evolution: firstly, framing the bio-economic approach into the context of the assessments of climate change impacts, and secondly, by reviewing empirical studies at the global and European level. Based on this review, common findings emerge in both global and regional assessments. Among them, the authors show that overall results tend to hide significant disparities on smaller spatial scales. Furthermore, due to the effects of crop prices over yield changes, several authors highlight the need to consider endogenous price models to assess production impacts of climate change. Further, major developments are discussed: the progress made since the last two decades and the recent methods used to provide insights into modeling uncertainties. However, there are still challenges to be met. On this matter, the authors take these unresolved challenges as guidelines for future research.
    Economics 01/2015; 9(10):1-53. DOI:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-10 · 0.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Towards 2050, climate change is one of the possible drivers that will change the farming landscape, but market, policy and technological development may be at least equally important. In the last decade, many studies assessed impacts of climate change and specific adaptation strategies. However, adaptation to climate change must be considered in the context of other driving forces that will cause farms of the future to look differently from today’s farms. In this paper we use a historical analysis of the influence of different drivers on farm structure, complemented with literature and stakeholder consultations, to assess future structural change of farms in a region under different plausible futures. As climate change is one of the drivers considered, this study thus puts climate change impact and adaptation into the context of other drivers. The province of Flevoland in the north of The Netherlands was used as case study, with arable farming as the main activity. To account for the heterogeneity of farms and to indicate possible directions of farm structural change, a farm typology was developed. Trends in past developments in farm types were analyzed with data from the Dutch agricultural census. The historical analysis allowed to detect the relative importance of driving forces that contributed to farm structural changes. Simultaneously, scenario assumptions about changes in these driving forces elaborated at global and European levels, were downscaled for Flevoland, to regional and farm type level in order to project impacts of drivers on farm structural change towards 2050. Input from stakeholders was also used to detail the downscaled scenarios and to derive historical and future relationships between drivers and farm structural change. These downscaled scenarios and future driver-farm structural change relationships were used to derive quantitative estimations of farm structural change at regional and farm type level in Flevoland. In addition, stakeholder input was used to also derive images of future farms in Flevoland. The estimated farm structural changes differed substantially between the two scenarios. Our estimations of farm structural change provide a proper context for assessing impacts of and adaptation to climate change in 2050 at crop and farm level
    Landscape Ecology 04/2012; 27(4):509-527. DOI:10.1007/s10980-012-9714-7 · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phenological development of crops has been extensively studied in field experiments but less so at larger scales for which data availability is often limited. To what extent the spatio-temporal variability of crop development can be explained by relationships derived from field studies such as the temperature sum concept used in many crop models is unclear but the question could entail the large scale application of these models. The aim of this study was to analyze the spatio-temporal patterns of crop phenological development in response to temperature and day length. We used a comprehensive dataset (656,234 phenological observations at 6019 observation sites) about the phenology of oat (Avena sativa L.) and related climate data from Germany for the period 1959–2009. Our results show that the statistically significant warming trend since 1959 resulted in an earlier onset of all phenological stages and a shortening of most phenological phases with a 17-day earlier onset of yellow ripeness and a shortening of the “sowing to yellow ripeness” phase by 14 days. There was also a distinct spatial pattern in phenological development, with differences among eco-regions in the occurrence of development stages of 15–26 days and the length of the phases between stages of 6 and 21 days. Most of this spatio-temporal variability could be explained through the effects of temperature and day length. However, temperature sums (thermal times) and day length corrected temperature sums (photo-thermal times) also varied in time and space, pointing to the use of different varieties over time and across eco-regions. A considerable part of this variability in temperature sums and photo-thermal times could be explained by the mean temperature during the development periods. This may provide a means of modelling farmers’ adaptation to climate change using varieties of different maturity types; but it requires further investigation. The good agreement of the thermal and photo-thermal requirements of oat computed in this study with relationships known from field experiments supports the use of the temperature sum concept for large scale application to simulate crop phenology in response to temperature and day length. The analysis should be extended to other crops and regions to further evaluate the observed spatio-temporal patterns in crop phenology and the relationships explaining these patterns.
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 01/2012; 152:44-57. DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.08.007 · 3.89 Impact Factor