Analysis of farm performance in Europe under different climatic and management conditions to improve understanding of adaptive capacity

Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (RIVM/MNP) P.O. Box 1 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands
Climatic Change (Impact Factor: 4.62). 09/2007; 84(3):403-422. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9242-7

ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to improve understanding of the adaptive capacity of European agriculture to climate change. Extensive
data on farm characteristics of individual farms from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) have been combined with climatic
and socio-economic data to analyze the influence of climate and management on crop yields and income and to identify factors
that determine adaptive capacity. A multilevel analysis was performed to account for regional differences in the studied relationships.
Our results suggest that socio-economic conditions and farm characteristics should be considered when analyzing effects of
climate conditions on farm yields and income. Next to climate, input intensity, economic size and the type of land use were
identified as important factors influencing spatial variability in crop yields and income. Generally, crop yields and income
are increasing with farm size and farm intensity. However, effects differed among crops and high crop yields were not always
related to high incomes, suggesting that impacts of climate and management differ by impact variable. As farm characteristics
influence climate impacts on crop yields and income, they are good indicators of adaptive capacity at farm level and should
be considered in impact assessment models. Different farm types with different management strategies will adapt differently.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Institutional feasibility defined as the ability of institutions to support adaptive capacity, is an important aspect of climate adaptation, through its influence on the implementation of adaptation measures to climate change. The objective of this study is to create a framework for assessing institutional preconditions that enable or constrain climate change adaptation measures in agriculture and to apply the framework to a case study in agriculture.
    Environmental Science & Policy 04/2015; 48. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.001 · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of weather in crop production at field is central to understanding the impact of climate change on agriculture and its implications for food security. In this study, we developed a bioeconomic modeling framework for estimating the field effect of weather on crop production at the regional scale with unobserved producer behavior. We took a systematic perspective for model development, explicitly considering crop production as a coupled human–nature system dominated by management adapted to local environmental and economic conditions. We drew on economics to characterize producer management behavior and crop yield consistent with the process of field production. We integrated scientific findings on plant growth and production economics to parameterize the yield function of crop that can be statistically estimated with observed data. An empirical application of our approach to spring wheat production found spatially heterogeneous effect of weather and climate change impact. Our modeling approach can be applied to different crops or regions to develop locally specific understandings of the management adjusted, production effect of weather and climate change impact, with implications on cropping system resilience and for adaptation.
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 07/2014; 16(3):279-302. DOI:10.1007/s10018-014-0079-9
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Geographical information systems support the application of statistical techniques to map spatially referenced crop data. To do this in the optimal way, errors and uncertainties have to be minimized that are often associated with operations on the data. This paper applies a spatial statistical approach to upscale crop yields from the field level toward the scale of Burkina Faso. Observed yields were related to the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index derived from SPOT-VEGETATION. The objective was to quantify the uncertainties at the subsequent steps. First, we applied a point pattern analysis to examine uncertainties due to the sampling network of field surveys in the country. Second, geographically weighted regression kriging (GWRK) was applied to upscale the yield observations and to quantify the corresponding uncertainty. The proposed method was demonstrated with the mapping of sorghum yields in Burkina Faso and results were compared with those from regression kriging (RK) and kriging with external drift using a local kriging neighborhood (KEDLN). The proposed method was validated with independent yield observations obtained from field surveys. We observed that the lower uncertainty range value increased by 39%, and the upper uncertainty range value decreased by 51%, when comparing GWRK with RK and KEDLN. Moreover, GWRK reduced the prediction error variance as compared to RK (20 vs. 31) and to KEDLN (20 vs. 39). We found that climate and topography had a major impact on the country’s sorghum yields. Further, the financial ability of farmers influenced the crop management and, thus, the sorghum crop yields. We concluded that GWRK effectively utilized information present in the covariate datasets and improved the accuracies of both the regional-scale mapping of sorghum yields and was able to quantify the associated uncertainty.
    International Journal of Geographical Information Science 02/2015; 29(2):1-24. DOI:10.1080/13658816.2014.959522 · 1.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 23, 2014