Article

A Multidisciplinary Teamwork Training Program: The Triad for Optimal Patient Safety (TOPS) Experience

Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 01/2008; 23(12):2053-2057. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0793-8

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONCommunication and teamwork failures are a common cause of adverse events. Residency programs, with a mandate to teach systems-based
practice, are particularly challenged to address these important skills.

AIMTo develop a multidisciplinary teamwork training program focused on teaching teamwork behaviors and communication skills.

SETTINGInternal medicine residents, hospitalists, nurses, pharmacists, and all other staff on a designated inpatient medical unit
at an academic medical center.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONWe developed a 4-h teamwork training program as part of the Triad for Optimal Patient Safety (TOPS) project. Teaching strategies
combined didactic presentation, facilitated discussion using a safety trigger video, and small-group scenario-based exercises
to practice effective communication skills and team behaviors. Development, planning, implementation, delivery, and evaluation
of TOPS Training was conducted by a multidisciplinary team.

PROGRAM EVALUATIONWe received 203 evaluations with a mean overall rating for the training of 4.49 ± 0.79 on a 1–5 scale. Participants rated
the multidisciplinary educational setting highly at 4.59 ± 0.68.

DISCUSSIONWe developed a multidisciplinary teamwork training program that was highly rated by all participating disciplines. The key
was creating a shared forum to learn about and discuss interdisciplinary communication and teamwork.

0 Followers
 · 
113 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Optimising clinical responses to deteriorating patients is an international indicator of acute healthcare quality. Observation charts incorporating track and trigger systems are an initiative to improve early identification and response to clinical deterioration. A suite of track and trigger 'Observation and Response Charts' were designed in Australia and initially tested in simulated environments. This paper reports initial clinical user experiences and views following implementation of these charts in adult general medical-surgical wards. Across eight trial sites, 44 focus groups were conducted with 218 clinical ward staff, mostly nurses, who received training and had used the charts in routine clinical practice for the preceding 2-6 weeks. Transcripts of audio recordings were analysed for emergent themes using an inductive approach. In this exploration of initial user experiences, key emergent themes were: tensions between vital sign 'ranges versus precision' to support decision making; using a standardised 'generalist chart in a range of specialist practice' areas; issues of 'clinical credibility', 'professional autonomy' and 'influences of doctors' when communicating abnormal signs; and 'permission and autonomy' when escalating care according to the protocol. Across themes, participants presented a range of positive, negative or mixed views. Benefits were identified despite charts not always being used up to their optimal design function. Participants reported tensions between chart objectives and clinical practices, revealing mismatches between design characteristics and human staff experiences. Overall, an initial view of 'increased activity/uncertain benefit' was uncovered. Findings particularly reinforced the significant influences of organisational work-based cultures, disciplinary boundaries and interdisciplinary communication on implementation of this new practice chart. Optimal use of all chart design characteristics will be possible when these broader cultural issues are addressed. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
    BMJ quality & safety 11/2014; 24(1). DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002777 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Education of health care professionals has given little attention to patient safety, resulting in limited understanding of the nature of risk in health care and the importance of strengthening systems. The World Health Organization developed the Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Multiprofessional Edition to accelerate the incorporation of patient safety teaching into higher educational curricula. The World Health Organization Curriculum Guide uses a health system-focused, team-dependent approach, which impacts all health care professionals and students learning in an integrated way about how to operate within a culture of safety. The guide is pertinent in the context of global educational reforms and growing recognition of the need to introduce patient safety into health care professionals' curricula. The guide helps to advance patient safety education worldwide in five ways. First, it addresses the variety of opportunities and contexts in which health care educators teach, and provides practical recommendations to learning. Second, it recommends shared learning by students of different professions, thus enhancing student capacity to work together effectively in multidisciplinary teams. Third, it provides guidance on a range of teaching methods and pedagogical activities to ensure that students understand that patient safety is a practical science teaching them to act in evidence-based ways to reduce patient risk. Fourth, it encourages supportive teaching and learning, emphasizing the need to establishing teaching environments in which students feel comfortable to learn and practice patient safety. Finally, it helps educators incorporate patient safety topics across all areas of clinical practice.
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 09/2014; 7:381-8. DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S53792
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Effective clinical leadership is associated with better patient care. We implemented and evaluated a pilot clinical leadership course for second year internal medicine residents at a large United States Academic Medical Center that is part of a multi-hospital health system.Methods The course met weekly for two to three hours during July, 2013. Sessions included large group discussions and small group reflection meetings. Topics included leadership styles, emotional intelligence, and leading clinical teams. Course materials were designed internally and featured ¿business school style¿ case studies about everyday clinical medicine which explore how leadership skills impact care delivery. Participants evaluated the course¿s impact and quality using a post-course survey. Questions were structured in five point likert scale and free text format. Likert scale responses were converted to a 1-5 scale (1¿=¿strongly disagree; 3¿=¿neither agree nor disagree; 5¿=¿strongly agree), and means were compared to the value 3 using one-way T-tests. Responses to free text questions were analyzed using the constant comparative method.ResultsAll sixteen pilot course participants completed the survey. Participants overwhelmingly agreed that the course provided content and skills relevant to their clinical responsibilities and leadership roles. Most participants also acknowledged that taking the course improved their understanding of their strengths and weaknesses as leaders, different leadership styles, and how to manage interpersonal conflict on clinical teams. 88% also reported that the course increased their interest in pursuing additional leadership training.ConclusionsA clinical leadership course for internal medicine residents designed by colleagues, and utilizing case studies about clinical medicine, resulted in significant self-reported improvements in clinical leadership competencies.
    BMC Medical Education 11/2014; 14(1):257. DOI:10.1186/s12909-014-0257-2 · 1.41 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
115 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014