Variations in blood thyroid hormone concentrations give an indirect indication of changes in thyroid gland activity; therefore,
selecting a suitable method to determine these hormones is crucial. The aim of this study was to compare serum thyroid hormone
concentrations (i.e. T4, T3, fT4 and fT3) using chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods in broiler breeders. This
study was carried out on 30 blood samples from randomly selected 45-week-old broiler breeders. Blood samples were collected
in summer from the wing vein of birds by using disposable syringes. The separated serum was analysed to determine thyroxine
(T4), triiodothyronine (T3), free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) concentrations using the mentioned methods. Data were processed in excel and statistical analysis was carried out using
SPSS/ver17 software. Our data from this study indicates there was a significant difference in the T4 (P < 0.0001), fT4 (P < 0.01) and fT3 (P < 0.05) concentrations between the two methods and that the levels of these hormones were higher when using the CLIA method,
except for fT3. The linear regression analysis of these hormones showed that the CLIA and ELISA results were significantly correlated only
for fT4 (P < 0.0001, r = 0.798) concentration. In conclusion, determination of the thyroid hormones using the CLIA method had an acceptable performance
of higher sensitivity and precision and was more appropriate than the ELISA method for clinical application and investigation
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine serum free-triiodothyronine (fT 3) level and its correlation between the CLIA and ECLIA methods in cow. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of 25 clinically healthy animals aged from 2 to 4 years. This study was performed in August. The separated sera were analyzed to measurement of fT 3 concentration using the CLIA and ECLIA methods. Our results indicate that there was no a significant difference between two method concerning the fT 3 concentration in cow, but its mean was higher in CLIA method. The regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between two methods: (p = 0.022, r = 0.460 for fT 3). It was concluded that the CLIA and ECLIA methods can be used as an alternative to the previous methods for assaying the fT 3 concentration in veterinary diagnostic laboratories and exhibited an acceptable of sensivity and precision for the serum fT 3 determination in cow.
Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 01/2011; 3(4):345-348. · 0.37 Impact Factor
Note: This list is based on the publications in our database and might not be exhaustive.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.