Article

Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples

Department of Molecular Genetics, 245 First Street, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. .
Genome biology (Impact Factor: 10.47). 06/2012; 13(6):R42. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r42
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To understand the relationship between our bacterial microbiome and health, it is essential to define the microbiome in the absence of disease. The digestive tract includes diverse habitats and hosts the human body's greatest bacterial density. We describe the bacterial community composition of ten digestive tract sites from more than 200 normal adults enrolled in the Human Microbiome Project, and metagenomically determined metabolic potentials of four representative sites.
The microbiota of these diverse habitats formed four groups based on similar community compositions: buccal mucosa, keratinized gingiva, hard palate; saliva, tongue, tonsils, throat; sub- and supra-gingival plaques; and stool. Phyla initially identified from environmental samples were detected throughout this population, primarily TM7, SR1, and Synergistetes. Genera with pathogenic members were well-represented among this disease-free cohort. Tooth-associated communities were distinct, but not entirely dissimilar, from other oral surfaces. The Porphyromonadaceae, Veillonellaceae and Lachnospiraceae families were common to all sites, but the distributions of their genera varied significantly. Most metabolic processes were distributed widely throughout the digestive tract microbiota, with variations in metagenomic abundance between body habitats. These included shifts in sugar transporter types between the supragingival plaque, other oral surfaces, and stool; hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide production were also differentially distributed.
The microbiomes of ten digestive tract sites separated into four types based on composition. A core set of metabolic pathways was present across these diverse digestive tract habitats. These data provide a critical baseline for future studies investigating local and systemic diseases affecting human health.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nicola Segata, Jul 19, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
120 Views
  • Source
    • "The human microbiome is a dynamic community changing in response to natural perturbations such as diet (Spencer et al., 2011; Turnbaugh et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2010). The oral cavity of humans hosts several hundred taxa, with remarkable diversity even among saliva, tongue, teeth, and other substrates (Dewhirst et al., 2010; Segata et al., 2012). All of the surfaces of the mouth are covered in a bacterial biofilm (Wade, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During oral passage, food tannins interact with the microbiota present in the oral cavity. Atopobium parvulum strains are inhabitants of the human oral cavity. A gene encoding a protein similar to bacterial tannases is present in A. parvulum strains. The tanAAp (apar_1020) gene was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). The overproduced TanAAp protein was purified to homogeneity. It exhibited optimal activity at pH 6.0 and broad temperature range, being these properties compatible with its action during food oral processing. However, purified TanAAp protein presented the lowest specific activity among bacterial tannases (3.5 U/mg) and was unable to hydrolyze complex tannin, such as tannic acid. These biochemical properties discard a main role of TanAAp in the breakdown of complex food tannins during oral processing.
    Food Research International 08/2014; 62:397–402. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.042 · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Within the gut tube, the host encounters an essentially continuous microbiological load that can include pathogens as well as a myriad of either beneficial or innocuous species. This complexity is enhanced by the presence of distinctly differentiated compartments within the gut tube, each with potentially distinct and permanent commensal communities (Faust et al., 2012; Koren et al., 2013; Segata et al., 2012). One often studied example is the human colon, which contains several compartments, including the often controversial cecal appendix, and hosts up to 100 trillion (10 14 ) bacterial cells at any given time, in effect generating orders of magnitude greater intraorganismal genetic complexity than that of the host genome itself (Andersson et al., 2008; Costello et al., 2009; Eckburg et al., 2005; Gill et al., 2006; Human Microbiome Project, 2012; Ley et al., 2006; Macfarlane and Macfarlane, 1997; Savage, 1977). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The animal gut serves as a primary location for the complex host-microbe interplay that is essential for homeostasis and may also reflect the types of ancient selective pressures that spawned the emergence of immunity in metazoans. In this review, we present a phylogenetic survey of gut host-microbe interactions and suggest that host defense systems arose not only to protect tissue directly from pathogenic attack but also to actively support growth of specific communities of mutualists. This functional dichotomy resulted in the evolution of immune systems much more tuned for harmonious existence with microbes than previously thought, existing as dynamic but primarily cooperative entities in the present day. We further present the protochordate Ciona intestinalis as a promising model for studying gut host-bacterial dialogue. The taxonomic position, gut physiology and experimental tractability of Ciona offer unique advantages in dissecting host-microbe interplay and can complement studies in other model systems.
    Developmental & Comparative Immunology 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.dci.2014.06.011 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "[31], and is even supported in phyloseq's rarefy_even_depth function [32] (though not recommended in its documentation). The perception in the microbiome literature of " rarefying to even sampling depth " as a standard normalization procedure appears to explain why rarefied counts are also used in studies that attempt to detect differential abundance of OTUs between predefined classes of samples [33] [34] [35] [36] [37], in addition to studies that use proportions directly [38]. It should be noted that we have adopted the recently coined term differential abundance [39] [40] as a direct analogy to differential expression from RNA-Seq. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current practice in the normalization of microbiome count data is inefficient in the statistical sense. For apparently historical reasons, the common approach is either to use simple proportions (which does not address heteroscedasticity) or to use rarefying of counts, even though both of these approaches are inappropriate for detection of differentially abundant species. Well-established statistical theory is available that simultaneously accounts for library size differences and biological variability using an appropriate mixture model. Moreover, specific implementations for DNA sequencing read count data (based on a Negative Binomial model for instance) are already available in RNA-Seq focused R packages such as edgeR and DESeq. Here we summarize the supporting statistical theory and use simulations and empirical data to demonstrate substantial improvements provided by a relevant mixture model framework over simple proportions or rarefying. We show how both proportions and rarefied counts result in a high rate of false positives in tests for species that are differentially abundant across sample classes. Regarding microbiome sample-wise clustering, we also show that the rarefying procedure often discards samples that can be accurately clustered by alternative methods. We further compare different Negative Binomial methods with a recently-described zero-inflated Gaussian mixture, implemented in a package called metagenomeSeq. We find that metagenomeSeq performs well when there is an adequate number of biological replicates, but it nevertheless tends toward a higher false positive rate. Based on these results and well-established statistical theory, we advocate that investigators avoid rarefying altogether. We have provided microbiome-specific extensions to these tools in the R package, phyloseq.
    PLoS Computational Biology 04/2014; 10(4):e1003531. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531 · 4.83 Impact Factor
Show more