Integrating the fish embryo toxicity test as triad element for sediment toxicity assessment based on the Water Framework Directive approach

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology Permoserstr. 15 04318 Leipzig Germany
Journal of Soils and Sediments (Impact Factor: 2.14). 04/2010; 10(3):389-399. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-009-0170-1


Purpose: The objective of this study was to complement analyses according to the European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD) with a sediment toxicity analysis as part of an integrated river assessment. To this end, Hessian water courses were analyzed using the sediment quality triad concept according to Chapman with chemical analyses, in situ effect evaluations, and ecotoxicological assessments. For the ecotoxicological assessment (fish embryo toxicity test with Danio rerio), a new evaluation scheme was developed, the fish teratogenicity index (FTI), that allows for a classification of sediments into ecological quality classes compliant to the WFD. Materials and methods: Sediment and macrozoobenthos samples were taken from tributaries of the rivers Fulda and Lahn. Sediments were characterized regarding particle size, carbon, heavy metals, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon content. Macroinvertebrate samples were taken via multi-habitat sampling. The fish embryo toxicity test with D. rerio was conducted as a contact assay on the basis of DIN 38415-6. Results and discussion: The integrated assessment indicated a significant influence of heavy metals and carbon content on macroinvertebrate communities. The bioaccessibility of sediment pollutants were clearly demonstrated by the FTI, which showed a wide range of adverse effects. A significant linear relationship between metals and the FTI was detected. However, there was no statistically significant evidence that macroinvertebrate communities were affected by the hydromorphological quality elements at the sampling sites. Conclusions: The new scheme for the assessment of fish embryo toxicity test was successfully applied. The results suggest that sediment compounds impact macroinvertebrate communities and early development of fish. It demonstrates that the quality of sediments should be evaluated on a routine basis as part of an integrated river assessment.


Available from: Jörg Oehlmann
  • Source
    • "Then, the results from ecological indices and ecotoxicological analyses were analysed through Pearson correlations. Similarly, Bartzke et al. (2010) developed an index based on fish embryo toxicity test, the fish teratogenicity index. Observed effects were weighted according to the effect intensity and mathematically combined in an index. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) represents a transformation of the guidelines for water quality assessment and monitoring across all EU Member States. At present, it is widely accepted that the WFD requires holistic and multidisciplinary ecological approaches by integrating multiple lines of evidence. Within the scope of the WFD, the scientific community identified clear opportunities to take advantage of an ecotoxicological line of evidence. In this context, ecotoxicological tools, namely biomarkers and bioassays, were proposed to contribute to the integration of the chemical and biological indicators, and thus to provide an overall insight into the quality of a water body. More than one decade after the publication of the WFD, we reviewed the studies that have attempted to integrate ecotoxicological tools in the assessment of surface water bodies. For this purpose, we reviewed studies providing an ecological water status assessment through more conventional community based approaches, in which biomarkers and/or bioassays were also applied to complement the evaluation. Overall, from our review emerges that studies at community level appear suitable for assessing the ecological quality of water bodies, whereas the bioassays/biomarkers are especially useful as early warning systems and to investigate the causes of ecological impairment, allowing a better understanding of the cause–effect-relationships. In this sense, community level responses and biomarkers/bioassays seem to be clearly complementary, reinforcing the need of combining the approaches of different disciplines to achieve the best evaluation of ecosystem communities’ health.
    Ecological Indicators 01/2015; 48:8–16. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.024 · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "lethal, genotoxic or endocrine) are determined, gained more and more importance in recent years. [11] [12] [13] [14] In whole sediment bioassays the contamination situation is reflected best, yielding various benefits: the test organisms are exposed to chemical mixtures, and integrated effects of multiple contaminants with antagonistic or additive effects are considered. In addition, the aspect of bioavailability is included. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was a sediment assessment of predominantly small rivers in the German federal state of Hesse. For this purpose, sediment samples were taken at 50 study sites with different contamination levels. The benthic invertebrates Chironomus riparius (Diptera) and Lumbriculus variegatus (Oligochaeta) were used as test species and exposed to whole sediments in chronic laboratory experiments. The bioassays were carried out on the basis of OECD guidelines 218 and 225 for the testing of chemicals. For about 50 % of the study sites chemical analytical data for pollutants from environmentally important substance classes like metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organotin compounds were available. These data were used to analyze correlations between effects in the bioassays and measured chemical contaminations at sampling sites. For 22 % of the sediments ecologically relevant adverse effects were observed. In the majority of these cases effects occurred in only one of the biotests, and only one sediment sample exerted a negative effect on both test organisms. There was no significant correlation between biological responses and chemical data considering substance classes. However, there was a weak positive correlation between arsenic concentration and both worm number and worm biomass as well as a weak positive correlation between single PAHs and worm biomass. In some sediment tests elevated ammonia concentrations occurred in the overlying water so that an influence of these partially toxic concentrations on the test results cannot be ruled out.
    Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 03/2012; 47(4):507-21. DOI:10.1080/10934529.2012.650545 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sediment quality triad (SQT), one of the important sediment quality assessment approaches, is defined as a conceptual and integrated technique based on biological response. It mainly comprises three complementary levels of evidence including sediment chemistry, laboratory sediment toxicity test and in situ benthic community structure. Each of the three traditional levels of evidence alone can independently reflect the environment risk of the contaminant in sediment by selecting suitable parameters. However, by combining these three levels of evidence, this approach can provide a comprehensive assessment in a weight of evidence means, which enhances the causal-effect relationship between the elevated chemical exposure and adverse biological effect, furthers the understanding of the ecology relevance between the hazardous materials and pollution levels. As consequences, it provides a robust basis for costal environmental control and remediation. Our objective is to focus on the newly advancement of SQT approach, draw experience and lessons to promote the coastal sediment quality assessment in China. This paper reviewed the history and development of the method detailed in 2 aspects including evidence composition, data simplification and interpretation method. We further investigated techniques to enhance the reliability of SQT evaluation and prospect for the method and application research in view of our country's current status of coastal sediment quality assessment. Literature analysis shows that diversifying levels of evidence and improving data interpretation method can make evaluation result more reliable and understandable. SQT assessment can be more transparency by formalize and standardize the current interpretive tools, for instance, the tabular decision matrices. The SQT has been intensively used in the North America and frequently adopted as environmental management tools in European countries especially the Spain. It is one of the most applicable comprehensive assessment methods that the SQT intends to evaluate the adverse effect caused by chemical stressor in mediums like sediment. However, it should further develop to resolve and enhance the reliability, transparency of evaluation.
    Acta Ecologica Sinica 01/2012; 32(14):4566-4574. DOI:10.5846/stxb201108111177
Show more