Longitudinal Assessment of Pain, Coping, and Daily Functioning in Children with Sickle Cell Disease Receiving Pain Management Skills Training

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; University of Illinois
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (Impact Factor: 1.49). 05/2002; 9(2):109-119. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014940009788

ABSTRACT Objective. To conduct intensive pain management skills training (IST) in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and their parents and to comprehensively evaluate pain, coping, and daily functioning in children pre, immediately post, and 3 months following treatment. Methods. Three children who received IST in nonpharmacological and pharmacological pain management strategies completed a Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) at pre, post, and follow-up assessments, and daily pain and activity diaries for 18 weeks, spanning from 1 week pretreatment to 11 weeks posttreatment. Results. From pre- to posttreatment, 1 child receiving IST indicated increased report of active coping attempts and all 3 children indicated decreased report of negative thinking on the CSQ. Participants in IST used coping skills on 90% of days with pain and reported the skills to be moderately helpful on the daily diaries. For daily activities such as eating dinner, playing with friends, and hours slept, children participated similarly on days with pain and days without pain during the posttreatment period. Given the small number of participants in this study, individual cases are discussed to highlight similarities and differences in how participants responded to the treatment and during the 3-month follow-up period. Conclusions. In this pilot study, each participant showed improvement in coping and daily functioning after completing the IST program. Individual differences in response to treatment indicate the need for more targeted intervention programs that incorporate pharmacological and nonpharmacological components. The results of this study highlight both the promise and the complications of conducting comprehensive pain intervention and functional outcome studies in children with SCD.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychological interventions are an integral component of treatment programs for chronic pain in children and adolescents. However, the evidence base supporting their efficacy varies widely. Although strong and consistent evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions for relieving children’s headache, the evidence base supporting the use of cognitive and behavioral interventions for relieving other types of chronic pain is weak, as assessed by the number of controlled trials that have been conducted in children and by the few types of chronic pain that have been formally studied. Empirical support for most psychological interventions targeting nonheadache chronic pain derives from anecdotal reports and case studies. In this study we review this evidence, identify specific gaps in our knowledge base, and recommend practical strategies to obtain critical information about which therapies are best for which children and for which types of chronic pain.
    Seminars in Pain Medicine. 01/2003; 1(2):99-109.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A discussion of the use of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) in children with chronic illnesses presents a problematic but well-known dilemma. Many of the treatments for psychological distress in these children have historically been modified from better-known and validated treatments in children without chronic illness. In other words, what works in children who are not ill has been taken and modified to work with children who are ill. Any discussion of EBTs in children with chronic illness must take into consideration the work that has been done in the non-ill population. We will discuss the general themes, assessments, and interventions that have been discussed in the literature. One of the main overarching themes in pediatric psychology (in which psychological applications are made with children with chronic illnesses) is that psychological difficulties are similar, regardless of setting. When dealing with food refusal, the mental health worker will use similar interventions in children who are healthy and those who have a specific gastrointestinal disorder, such as Crohn‘s disease. Modifications may have to be made, given the unique medical history and care these ill children receive; but overall, the interventions will appear similar. In taking EBTs that have been demonstrated in healthy populations, researchers have had to adapt and modify these interventions. Thus, the literature has only recently begun to report EBTs in children who have chronic illnesses. In order to address the use of EBTs in this population, we will discuss the use of psychological interventions in several broad illness categories, with a view toward the application of these interventions across a range of illnesses.
    12/2007: pages 297-309;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine the potential moderating effect of age on the child-reported pain–social anxiety relationship in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD). Participants were children and adolescents (ages 8–17; 33 girls, 25 boys) diagnosed with SCD who completed measures of social anxiety and severity of usual pain. Caregivers provided demographic information, and mean hemoglobin levels were computed as a measure of objective disease severity. Ratings of more severe pain were associated with greater social anxiety, including fear of negative evaluation, for older children and adolescents only, revealing a moderating effect of age. Increased relevancy of peer relationships in adolescence, limited social contacts due to SCD complications, and misreading of social cues (e.g., maladaptive coping response to pain) may explain why older children and adolescents reported greater social anxiety in the presence of a stressor such as pain.
    Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 11/2004; 11(4):243-252. · 1.49 Impact Factor