Article

Causes of recent changes in western North American snowpack

Climate Dynamics (Impact Factor: 4.23). 01/2011; 38(9):1885-1899. DOI: 10.1007/s00382-011-1089-y

ABSTRACT Monthly snow water equivalent (SWE) station observations and gridded temperature data are used to identify mechanisms by which
warming affects the temporal and geographical structure of changes in western North American mountain snowpack. We first exploit
interannual variability to demonstrate the sensitivity of snowpack to temperature during the various phases of the snow season.
We show that mechanisms whereby temperature affects snowpack emerge in the mid to late portion of the snow season (March through
May), but are nearly absent during the earliest phase (February), when temperatures are generally well below freezing. The
mid to late snow season is precisely when significant loss of snowpack is seen at nearly all locations over the past few decades,
both through decreases in snow accumulation and increases in snowmelt. At locations where April 1st SWE has been increasing
over the past few decades, the increase is entirely due to a significant enhancement of accumulation during the earliest phase
of the snow season, when the sensitivity analysis indicates that temperature is not expected to affect snowpack. Later in
the snow season, these stations exhibit significant snowpack loss comparable to the other stations. Based on this analysis,
it is difficult to escape the conclusion that recent snowpack changes in western North America are caused by regional-scale
warming. Given predictions of future warming, a further reduction in late season snowpack and advancement in the onset of
snowmelt should be expected in the coming decades throughout the region.

KeywordsSnow water equivalent–Climate change–Climate sensitivity–Trends–Surface observations

2 Bookmarks
 · 
181 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Climate warming will likely cause a shift from snow to rain in midlatitude mountains. Because rain falls faster than snow, it is not advected as far by prevailing winds before reaching the ground. A shift in precipitation phase thus may alter precipitation patterns. Using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) regional climate model at 27-9-3 km resolutions over the California Sierra Nevada, we conducted an idealized experiment consisting of a present climate control run and two additional simulations in which (a) fall speed for snow is similar to rain and (b) all precipitation is constrained to fall as liquid. Rather than simulating future climates directly, these perturbation experiments allow us to test the potential impacts of changing precipitation phase in isolation from other factors such as variable large-scale atmospheric circulation. Relative to the control, both per- turbations result in a rain shadow deepened by $30–60%, with increased focusing of precipitation on the western Sierra Nevada slopes best resolved at ≤9 km resolutions. Our results suggest that altered precipitation phase associated with climate change will likely affect spatial distributions of water resources, floods, and landslides in the Sierra Nevada and similar midlatitude mountain ranges.
    Geophysical Research Letters 01/2012; 39. · 3.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent observations have documented declining snow water equivalent (SWE) and earlier melt in the coastal Cascade and Sierra Nevada mountain ranges, and climate models suggest that warming temperatures will decrease snowpack storage in the higher-elevation mountain ranges of interior western North America. To date, however, observations of changing SWE or snowmelt have been limited to the state of Colorado in the intermountain west (IMW), defined here as the Rio Grande, Colorado River, and Great Basins, which supply water to the driest regions of North America. We used daily SNOTEL data collected between 1984 and 2009 combined with the nonparametric regional Kendall test to demonstrate significant and widespread changes in the duration of snow cover in these river basins. Daily SNOTEL data demonstrated that basin average maximum SWE occurred as early as 7 March (Lower Colorado River Basin) and as late as 13 April (Upper Colorado, Yampa, and White River Basins). Although significant increases in winter temperature (T) were widespread, there were minimal changes in the day of maximum accumulation and no indications from SWE to winter precipitation ratios (SWE:P) and winter T observations that a transition from snow to rain had occurred. While there was little change in day of maximum accumulation, the duration of snow cover decreased in 11 of 13 drainage regions, and snowmelt center of mass (SM50) advanced 1 to 4 days per decade in 6 of 13 regions. There were significant trends toward a faster SM50 and shorter duration of snow cover in the highest-elevation regions (>2800 m) of the Colorado River Basin, suggesting that winter T and P may not be the primary driver of change. Our results show that the IMW hydroclimate is both spatially and temporally variable, with few changes in winter T and P in the Great Basin and drier and warmer winters in the Colorado River and Rio Grande Basins. The changes in snowmelt timing also were variable, with a shorter SM50 and less maximum SWE in the Colorado River and Rio Grande Basins. The variable response of snowpacks in the IMW to widespread warming highlights the need for additional research into the mass and energy balance of these continental snowpacks.
    Water Resources Research 11/2012; 48(11):11501-. · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We analyzed trends in surface air temperature and temperature extremes in the Great Basin during 1901-2010. We found that annual average daily minimum temperature increased significantly (0.9 ± 0.2°C) during the study period, with daily maximum temperature increasing only slightly. The asymmetric increase in daily minimum and maximum temperature resulted in daily diurnal temperature range (DTR) decreasing significantly from 1901 to 2010. Seasonally, increases in daily minimum temperature and decreases in DTR occurred in winter, summer, and autumn, but the rate of increase was faster in winter. In contrast, daily maximum temperature showed no significant trend in any season. These trends in temperature measures, however, were not monotonic with decadal periods that included either reversal or acceleration of century-scale trends. The trend magnitudes in temperatures were not significantly associated with elevations. Increases in daily minimum temperature resulted in a decrease in the number of frost days (-0.14 ± 0.04 day yr-1) and cool nights (-0.09 ± 0.04 night yr-1) from 1901 to 2010, while the number of warm days (0.11 ± 0.04 day yr-1) and warm nights (0.19 ± 0.03 night yr-1) increased significantly. Surprisingly, the number of cool days and the length of the growing season showed no significant trend during the study period. Thus, the results of this study suggest that continuation of the overall warming trend would lead to markedly warmer conditions in upcoming decades.
    Journal of Geophysical Research 05/2013; 118(9):3579-3589. · 3.17 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
6 Downloads
Available from
Sep 25, 2014