Article

Geographic variation in access to care--the relationship with quality.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 06/2012; 367(1):3-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1204516
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Three decades of research focused predominantly on costs and the use of services among Medicare beneficiaries has repeatedly found wide regional variations in health care experiences and health system performance.(1) Much less attention has been paid to variations in access to care and their associated implications for quality of care and health outcomes. Our recent Commonwealth Fund report, "Rising to the Challenge: Results from a Scorecard on Local Health System Performance,"(2) shows that when we look beyond state averages, there are staggeringly wide gaps in people's ability to gain access to care in different communities around the country. We also . . .

0 Bookmarks
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Rural and regional populations suffer higher rates of preventable disease and all-cause mortality than urban areas, with rural areas of the USA experiencing double the rate of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We investigated the incidence and outcomes of ruptured AAAs in an Australian rural and regional setting, and compared these with those of an urban population. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of all patients suffering AAA rupture in New South Wales (NSW) from 2009/2010 to 2010/2011. Variables included rates of rupture, mortality and intensive care admission. Urban and rural-regional areas were stratified according to NSW Health Local Health Districts, and comparisons between the two groups were performed. RESULTS: Ruptured AAAs had an incidence of 4.1/100 000, with males twice as likely to suffer AAA rupture (P = 0.009), but females 88% more likely to die from rupture (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between AAA rupture rates (5.0 versus 3.4 per 100 000; P = 0.054) nor case-fatality rates (41.22% versus 40.94%; P = 0.087) in rural-regional and urban populations. Patients in urban areas had a longer hospital stay (5 days versus 1 day, P = 0.001), were more likely to be admitted to intensive care unit (29.4% versus 19.9%, P = 0.001) and were less likely to be transferred to another hospital (19% versus 32%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AAA ruptures remain a significant public health burden. Rural and regional areas suffer disproportionately, which may be improved by implementation of AAA screening and funding for rural and regional hospitals to sustain adequate surgical and intensive care facilities.
    ANZ Journal of Surgery 01/2013; · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CONTEXT: Due to the complexity and challenging nature of radical prostatectomy (RP), it is likely that both short- and long-term outcomes strongly depend on the cumulative number of cases performed by the surgeon as well as by the hospital. OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the association between hospital and surgeon volume and perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for original and review articles between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2011. Inclusion and exclusion criteria comprised RP, hospital and/or surgeon volume reported as a predictor variable, a measurable end point, and a description of multiple hospitals or surgeons. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall 45 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria, where most data originated from retrospective institutional or population-based cohorts. Studies generally focused on hospital or surgeon volume separately. Although most of these analyses corroborated the impact of increasing volume with better outcomes, some failed to find any significant effect. Studies also differed with respect to the proposed volume cut-off for improved outcomes, as well as the statistical means of evaluating the volume-outcome relationship. Five studies simultaneously compared hospital and surgeon volume, where results suggest that the importance of either hospital or surgeon volume largely depends on the end point of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Undeniable evidence suggests that increasing volume improves outcomes. Although it would seem reasonable to refer RP patients to high-volume centers, such regionalization may not be entirely practical. As such, the implications of such a shift in practice have yet to be fully determined and warrant further exploration.
    European Urology 04/2013; · 10.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the endorsement of several quality measures for prostate cancer by the National Quality Forum and the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement, how consistently physicians adhere to these measures has not been examined. We evaluated regional variation in adherence to these quality measures in order to identify targets for future quality improvement. For this retrospective cohort study, we used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare data for 2001-2007 to identify 53,614 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Patients were assigned to 661 regions (Hospital Service Areas [HSAs]). Hierarchical generalized linear models were used to examine reliability adjusted regional adherence to the endorsed quality measures. Adherence at the patient level was highly variable, ranging from 33% for treatment by a high-volume provider to 76% for receipt of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy while undergoing radiotherapy for high-risk cancer. Additionally, there was considerable regional variation in adherence to several measures, including pretreatment counseling by both a urologist and radiation oncologist (range 9% to 89%, p<0.001), avoiding overuse of bone scans in low-risk cancer (range 16% to 96%, p<0.001), treatment by a high-volume provider (range 1% to 90%, p<0.001), and follow-up with radiation oncologists (range 14% to 86%, p<0.001). We found low adherence rates for most established prostate cancer quality of care measures. Within most measures, regional variation in adherence was pronounced. Measures with low adherence and a large amount of regional variation may be important low-hanging targets for quality improvement.
    The Journal of urology 10/2013; · 3.75 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
6 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014