Periodontal Disease in Habitual Cigarette Smokers and Nonsmokers With and Without Prediabetes

Engineer Abdullah Bugshan Research Chair for Growth Factors and Bone Regeneration (FJ, MA-A, KA-H), College of Applied Medical Sciences
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences (Impact Factor: 1.52). 06/2012; 345(2). DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31824d5337
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION:: Prediabetes and habitual cigarette smoking are significant risk factors contributing to periodontal disease. The aim was to assess the clinical and radiological markers of periodontal disease in habitual cigarette smokers and nonsmokers with and without prediabetes. METHODS:: Sixty-eight individuals with prediabetes (test group; 34 smokers and 34 nonsmokers) and 68 medically healthy individuals (control group; 34 smokers and 34 nonsmokers) were included. Sociodemographic information, duration of smoking habit and number of cigarettes smoked daily were recorded through a questionnaire. Fasting blood glucose levels and periodontal inflammatory conditions (plaque index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing pocket depth [PPD] of 4 to <6 mm and ≥6 mm) were recorded. In both groups, marginal bone loss (MBL) was measured on digital panoramic radiographs. RESULTS:: Cigarette smokers and nonsmokers in the test group had significantly higher fasting blood glucose level when compared with cigarette smokers in the control group (P < 0.001). In the test group, there was no significant difference in PI, BOP, PPD (4 to <6 mm and ≥6 mm) and MBL among cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. Cigarette smokers in the control group had significantly higher PI (P < 0.001), PPD (4 to <6 mm; P < 0.001), PPD ≥6 mm (P < 0.01) and MBL (P < 0.05) than nonsmokers. BOP was significantly reduced in smokers when compared with nonsmokers in the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:: Cigarette smokers without prediabetes exhibit significantly severe periodontal disease than nonsmokers. In subjects with prediabetes, the severity of periodontal disease seems to be over shadowed by the hyperglycemic state, obscuring the effect of habitual smoking.


Available from: Fawad Javed, Feb 25, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim was to assess the effect of scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical periodontal parameters and glycemic levels in prediabetic patients. Fifty prediabetic patients with periodontal disease were included. Demographic data (age, gender, education status, duration of prediabetes, type of treatment adopted for prediabetes management, and oral hygiene maintenance protocols) were recorded using a questionnaire. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (25 patients/group). In Group 1, SRP alone was performed, in Group 2, SRP + oral doxycycline (100 mg) administration. In both groups, fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels and periodontal parameters (plaque index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP], and probing depth [PD]) were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance. Age, gender, and duration and treatment of prediabetes were comparable among patients in Groups 1 and 2. PI, BOP, and PD significantly reduced in both groups than baseline values. Reduction in periodontal parameters among Groups 1 and 2 were comparable. There was no significant reduction in FBG levels among patients in Groups 1 and 2 after 6 months of SRP. SRP was effective in reducing periodontal inflammation in prediabetic patients. FBG levels did not show any significant difference after SRP in both groups.
    01/2015; 1(-1):1-5. DOI:10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.004
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: Periodontal flap surgery is often required to achieve adequate reduction in probing depth (PD) in habitual smokers with advanced periodontal disease. Yet, results from clinical studies have reported disadvantageous results for periodontal healing response in smokers as compared to non-smokers. To our knowledge, a meta-analysis of studies assessing the effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal flap procedures has not been previously performed. Thus, the aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on controlled, clinical studies comparing periodontal flap surgical procedures in smokers verses non-smokers. Material and Methods: A systematic review of articles relevant to periodontal flap surgical procedures in smokers was performed electronically utilizing the PubMed, MEDLINE (OVID) database, the EMBASE database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Ovid Medline(R) In-Process database from 1946 up to and including March 2014 utilizing predefined, optimized search strategies. Meta-analyses were conducted separately for each of the two primary outcomes: Changes in clinical attachment levels (CAL) and PD. Results: The initial search yielded 390 titles and abstracts. Following initial screening, 15 out of 390 publications were scrutinized during the second phase of the review. In the second phase, 7 articles were excluded from the analysis and 8 controlled, clinical studies were finally selected. Qualitative assessment of the articles consistently showed an increased treatment effect in non-smokers verses smokers. Meta-analysis on 8 studies reporting on 363 study participants showed an increased reduction in mean [95% Confidence Interval] PD of 0.39mm [0.45, 0.33]. Similar results were found for gain in CAL. Conclusions: Considering the relatively homogeneous available information we concluded that active smokers could be candidates for periodontal flap surgical procedures, but they should be thoroughly informed pre-operatively for the significantly reduced clinical outcomes as compared to non-smokers.
    Journal of Periodontology 09/2014; 86(2). DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.140452 · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ideal management of peri-implant diseases focuses on infection control, detoxification of implant surfaces, regeneration of lost tissues and plaque control regimes via mechanical debridement (with or without raising a surgical flap).15, 16 However, a variety of other therapeutic modalities have also been proposed for the management of peri-implantitis. These treatment strategies encompass use of antiseptics and/or antibiotics, laser therapy, guided bone regeneration and photodynamic therapy.16-23 The aim of this article was to review indexed literature with reference to the various therapeutic interventions proposed for the management of peri-implant diseases.
    Dental Clinics of North America 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.002