Article

Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients: a connectivity and frequency analysis to find differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states.

Cyclotron Research Centre and Neurology Department, University Hospital of Liege, Belgium.
Functional neurology (Impact Factor: 1.86). 01/2012; 27(1):41-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to look for differences in the power spectra and in EEG connectivity measures between patients in the vegetative state (VS/UWS) and patients in the minimally conscious state (MCS). The EEG of 31 patients was recorded and analyzed. Power spectra were obtained using modern multitaper methods. Three connectivity measures (coherence, the imaginary part of coherency and the phase lag index) were computed. Of the 31 patients, 21 were diagnosed as MCS and 10 as VS/UWS using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). EEG power spectra revealed differences between the two conditions. The VS/UWS patients showed increased delta power but decreased alpha power compared with the MCS patients. Connectivity measures were correlated with the CRS-R diagnosis; patients in the VS/UWS had significantly lower connectivity than MCS patients in the theta and alpha bands. Standard EEG recorded in clinical conditions could be used as a tool to help the clinician in the diagnosis of disorders of consciousness.

Full-text

Available from: Quentin Noirhomme, Jan 17, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
82 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in the development of new paradigms as well as in neuroimaging techniques nowadays enable us to make inferences about the level of consciousness patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) retain. They moreover allow predicting their probable development. Today, we know that certain brain responses (e.g. event-related potentials or oscillatory changes) to stimulation, circadian rhythmicity, the presence or absence of sleep patterns as well as measures of resting state brain activity can serve the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation process. Still, the paradigms we are using nowadays do not allow to disentangle VS/UWS and MCS patients with the desired reliability and validity. Furthermore, even rather well-established methods have unfortunately not found their way into clinical routine yet. We here review current literature as well as preliminary findings and discuss how neuroimaging methods (fMRI, PET) and particularly EEG can be used to investigate cognition in DOC or even to assess the degree of residual awareness. We, moreover, propose that circadian rhythmicity and sleep in brain-injured patients are promising fields of research in this context.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 02/2015; 9:105. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00105 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective:Standard clinical characterization of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) relies on observation of motor output and may therefore lead to the misdiagnosis of vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) in patients with preserved cognition. We used conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) measures to assess a cohort of DOC patients with and without functional MRI (fMRI)-based evidence of command following, and correlated the findings with standard clinical behavioral evaluation and brain metabolic activity.Methods:We enrolled 44 patients with severe brain injury. Behavioral diagnosis was established using standardized clinical assessments. Long-term EEG recordings were analyzed to determine wakeful background organization and presence of elements of sleep architecture. A subset of patients had fMRI testing of command following using motor imagery paradigms (26 patients) and resting brain metabolism measurement using 18FDG-PET (31 patients).Results:All four patients with fMRI evidence of covert command following consistently demonstrated well-organized EEG background during wakefulness, spindling activity during sleep, and relative preservation of cortical metabolic activity. In the entire cohort, EEG organization and overall brain metabolism showed no significant association with bedside behavioral testing, except in a few cases when EEG was severely abnormal.Interpretation:These findings suggest that conventional EEG is a simple strategy that complements behavioral and imaging characterization of DOC patients. Preservation of specific EEG features may be used to assess the likelihood of unrecognized cognitive abilities in severely brain injured patients with very limited or no motor responses. ANN NEUROL 2014. © 2014 American Neurological Association
    Annals of Neurology 12/2014; 76(6):869-79. DOI:10.1002/ana.24283 · 11.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the advent of neuroimaging techniques the level of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) is better assessable today. What we know so far, is that presence or absence of certain brain responses to stimulation, circadian rhythms or sleep patterns as well as certain forms of resting state activity can serve in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation process. Despite the considerable progress in this field we still lack a comprehensive understanding of DOC which enables us to reliably differentiate DOC states in clinical routine. We here review current literature and discuss how classical neuroimaging methods (fMRI, PET) and in particular EEG can shed light on the level of preserved cognition or even the degree of conscious awareness.