Article

Allograft rejection is restrained by short-lived TIM-3+PD-1+Foxp3+ Tregs.

Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, The Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
The Journal of clinical investigation (Impact Factor: 15.39). 06/2012; 122(7):2395-404. DOI: 10.1172/JCI45138
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tregs play a pivotal role in inducing and maintaining donor-specific transplant tolerance. The T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-3 protein (TIM-3) is expressed on many fully activated effector T cells. Along with program death 1 (PD-1), TIM-3 is used as a marker for exhausted effector T cells, and interaction with its ligand, galectin-9, leads to selective death of TIM-3+ cells. We report herein the presence of a galectin-9-sensitive CD4+FoxP3+TIM-3+ population of T cells, which arose from CD4+FoxP3+TIM-3- proliferating T cells in vitro and in vivo and were often PD-1+. These cells became very prominent among graft-infiltrating Tregs during allograft response. The frequency and number of TIM-3+ Tregs peaked at the time of graft rejection and declined thereafter. Moreover, these cells also arise in a tolerance-promoting donor-specific transfusion model, representing a pool of proliferating, donor-specific Tregs. Compared with TIM-3- Tregs, TIM-3+ Tregs, which are often PD-1+ as well, exhibited higher in vitro effector function and more robust expression of CD25, CD39, CD73, CTLA-4, IL-10, and TGF-β but not galectin-9. However, these TIM-3+ Tregs did not flourish when passively transferred to newly transplanted hosts. These data suggest that a heretofore unrecognized graft-infiltrating, short-lived subset of Tregs can restrain rejection.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
287 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the past 20 years, major advances have been made in understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms of allergen tolerance in humans. The demonstration of T cell tolerance, particularly that mediated by the immune-suppressive functions of IL-10, led to a major conceptual change in this area. Currently, the known essential components of allergen tolerance include the induction of allergen-specific regulatory subsets of T and B cells, the immune-suppressive function of secreted factors, such as IL-10 and TGF-β, the production of IgG4 isotype allergen-specific blocking antibodies, and decreased allergic inflammatory responses by mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils in inflamed tissues.
    Journal of Clinical Investigation 11/2014; 124(11):4678-80. DOI:10.1172/JCI78891 · 13.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Objective Acute rejection is still a major cause of graft dysfunction and would jeopardize recipients’ post-transplantation survival. Current studies demonstrate that Galectin-9 (Gal-9) is associated with down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, thus, possesses a negative immune regulatory role. However, the specific role of Gal-9 in liver transplant remains unknown. Methods To establish acute rejection models of rat liver transplantation (Lewis-BN, n = 45), recipients were randomly divided into following three groups: the transfected group (n = 15); the blank plasmid group (n = 15); and the control group (n = 15). The transfected group were perfused with Ad-galectin-9 through the portal vein during the cold ischemia period. The blank plasmid group was perfused with non-target vector, and the control group was perfused with saline. The acute rejection was assayed by pathological examination; Gal-9, T-bet, RORγt, GATA3 and Foxp3 mRNA expression was detected by real-time PCR; Western blots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed to measure IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-17 expression. Results The pathological change of the transfected group was ameliorated than that of the other two groups. The Gal-9 mRNA level in the transfected group was much higher than that in the other two groups (*P < 0.05); T-bet and RORγt mRNA levels were significantly lower in the transfected group than in the other two groups while GATA3 and Foxp3 were not shown statistics significances (*P < 0.05). The IFN-γ and IL-17 levels in the transfected group were significantly lower than in the other two groups (*P < 0.05 for both protein and serum levels). Conclusion Up-regulation of Gal-9 in vivo turns immune system towards immnuosuppression and prolongs rats liver allograft survival by the diminishment of Th1/Th17.
    Immunology Letters 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.imlet.2014.09.002 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stimulatory and inhibitory receptor signaling (cosignaling) on T cells is a critical component of T-cell responses that mediate graft rejection. The blockade of cosignaling pathways is an attractive strategy for preventing allogeneic T-cell responses. Here, we review the new studies that provide critical insight into the well studied CD28-CTLA-4 and CD40-CD40L cosignaling pathways, as well as the identification of novel cosignaling receptors that play a role in allogeneic T-cell responses. Recently, it has been appreciated that the CD28-CTLA-4 pathway has unique roles on specific T-cell subsets, particularly on forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) regulatory T cell (Treg) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells. New insight has been provided into the mechanism by which CD40-CD154 blockade elicits FoxP3 Treg conversion and memory T cells elicit CD40-independent alloantibody responses. Finally, several novel cosignaling pathways have been demonstrated to be important to graft-specific T cells, including CD160, signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 2B4, T-cell Ig mucin 4, and the Notch receptor. Recent work has provided more granular understanding of the CD28-CTLA-4 and CD40-CD154 pathways on T-cell subsets, and provided important insight into the generation and maintenance of FoxP3 Treg. This information, as well as the characterization of novel transplantation-relevant cosignaling pathways, has implications for the modulation of alloreactive T-cell responses.
    Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 02/2015; 20(1):43-8. DOI:10.1097/MOT.0000000000000151 · 2.38 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
127 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014