Revisiting Regression in Autism: Heller's Dementia Infantilis Includes A Translation of Uber Dementia Infantilis

Yale Child Study Center, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA, .
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.06). 06/2012; 43(2). DOI: 10.1007/s10803-012-1559-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Theodor Heller first described a severe regression of adaptive function in normally developing children, something he termed dementia infantilis, over one 100 years ago. Dementia infantilis is most closely related to the modern diagnosis, childhood disintegrative disorder. We translate Heller's paper, Über Dementia Infantilis, and discuss similarities in presentation between Heller's cases, and a group of children with childhood disintegrative disorder. In particular we discuss a prodromal period of affective dysregulation described by Heller, and also evident in our sample, but not previously described in any detail since the publication of Über Dementia Infantilis.

7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Seven decades have elapsed since Leo Kanner described the syndrome he termed early infantile autism. Over this time, and particularly over the past two decades, noteworthy changes have occurred in how the condition is conceptualized. Here we provide an overview of these changes, beginning with a brief discussion of the significance of classification in general before discussing Kanner's original paper and subsequent changes. We touch on relevant issues, such as comorbidity, dimensional aspects of diagnosis and screening, and the complex issue of diagnosis relative to eligibility for services. Approaches to diagnosis have tended to swing from emphasizing overarching groups (lumping) to focusing on potentially distinct subgroups (splitting). Autism raises particular problems given the broad range of syndrome expression over age and developmental level. The most recent revision of the American Psychiatric Association's diagnostic taxonomy marks a significant departure from its predecessor and has been the focus of much debate. It remains unclear which of the currently existing categorical approaches will ultimately be most widely applied. We hope to convey a sense of areas in which consensus has been achieved and areas of continued controversy. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 10 is March 20, 2014. Please see for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12/2013; 10(1). DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153710 · 12.67 Impact Factor