Article

Efficacy of oral tolvaptan in acute heart failure patients with hypotension and renal impairment

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.51). 07/2012; 13(7):415-22. DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328355a740
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although congestion is the main reason for admission in patients with worsening acute heart failure syndromes, patients presenting with low SBP and renal impairment often do not respond adequately to and may not tolerate traditional diuretic therapy. We sought to determine the short-term hemodynamic effects of tolvaptan in this high-risk population.
In a subset analysis of the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study with Tolvaptan trial, 759 patients (18% of total) had elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (> 20  mg/dl) and low SBP (<105  mmHg) at admission. Of these, 386 were randomized to tolvaptan and 373 to placebo.
Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Greater reductions from baseline in body weight were observed for tolvaptan (1.63 ±  2.00 vs. 0.76  ±  1.75  kg, P  <  0.0001 at day 1 and 3.23  ±  3.36 vs. 2.10  ±  3.47  kg, P  <  0.0001 at day 7 or discharge). Greater increases in serum sodium concentration were also observed in the tolvaptan group as early as day 1 (4.41  ±  3.67 vs. 1.32  ±  3.93  mEq/l, P  <  0.0001) and persisted through day 7 or discharge (4.79  ±  4.89 vs. 1.25  ±  5.00  mEq/l, P  <  0.0001). Similarly, improvements in patient-reported dyspnea and investigator-assessed orthopnea were significantly greater in the tolvaptan group as early as day 1 of treatment. These changes were not associated with significant differences in heart rate, SBP, DBP or serum creatinine between patients in the two treatment groups during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality rates (total and cause-specific) were comparable to patients who had presented with SBP more than 105  mmHg and BUN less than 20  mg/dl.
In this subgroup analysis of patients with hypotension and renal impairment, tolvaptan improved symptoms, reduced body weight and increased serum sodium as early as inpatient day 1 without adversely affecting blood pressure or renal function.

0 Followers
 · 
236 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context:Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder encountered in clinical practice and represents a clinical, social, and economic burden. Conventional treatments of hyponatremia present some pitfalls, such as suboptimal efficacy, risk of overly rapid correction, and adverse effects. Vasopressin receptor antagonists, known as vaptans, represent a new and interesting class of drugs for the treatment of the euvolemic and hypervolemic forms of hyponatremia.Evidence Acquisition:This review is based on a PubMed search with the following terms: "vaptans," "vasopressin receptor antagonists," "tolvaptan," "conivaptan," "vasopressin receptor antagonists and SIADH," "vasopressin receptor antagonists and congestive heart failure," "vasopressin receptor antagonists and cirrhosis," and "vasopressin receptor antagonists and polycystic kidney disease."Evidence Synthesis:Overall, the studies reported in this review indicate that vaptans effectively correct hyponatremia in euvolemic and hypervolemic patients. In the latter group, vaptans generally had favorable effects on fluid balance also. To date two vaptans, ie, conivaptan and tolvaptan, have been marketed in the United States for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia, whereas tolvaptan has been marketed in Europe with the limitation of euvolemic hyponatremia. Although these drugs have a good safety profile, caution should be used, and treatment should be initiated in a hospital setting in order to closely monitor patients and avoid overly rapid correction or overcorrection.Conclusions:Vaptans can be considered a new effective tool for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Nevertheless, more comparative research of vaptans vs other therapies on clinical grounds is needed to more accurately assess the value of these drugs in the treatment of hyponatremia.
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 02/2013; 98(4). DOI:10.1210/jc.2012-4082 · 6.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Tolvaptan, a diuretic with a new mechanism of action, selectively binds to the vasopressin V2 receptor and inhibits reabsorption of water. Its effect on heart failure is proven, but its benefit for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been not confirmed. In this study, we examined the effect of tolvaptan on patients with severe CKD. METHODS: We analyzed patients with stage 4 or higher CKD who had congestive heart failure that was resistant to existing diuretics. The patients were administered an initial tolvaptan dose of 7.5 mg/day. We assumed urine volume and urine osmolality to be the main effective endpoint and recorded free water clearance, serum osmolality, serum creatinine (Cr) level, and adverse events. RESULTS: There was no instance of clinically significant hypernatremia. The urine volume increased significantly (P < 0.0001), as did the urine osmolality (P = 0.0053). Free water clearance showed a tendency to increase, although the difference was not statistically significant. The serum creatinine level did not change significantly, and there was no clear effect on renal function. However, in patients with stage 5 CKD, the serum creatinine level decreased significantly (n = 5, P = 0.0435). There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that tolvaptan has a diuretic effect in patients with both severe CKD and congestive heart failure without causing either clinically significant hypernatremia or an adverse effect on renal function. Tolvaptan is an effective diuretic for patients with CKD.
    Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 03/2013; 17(6). DOI:10.1007/s10157-013-0788-6 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complex interactions existing between cardiac and renal diseases led to define 5 types of so-called cardiorenal syndromes. This classification is based on the organ primarily involved and the acute or chronic failure. The mutual impact of renal and cardiac functions makes it difficult to evaluate and manage patients with cardiorenal syndromes and worsen morbidity and mortality. This review seeks to discuss the place of biomarkers in diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with cardiorenal syndromes. Biomarkers can be classified as functional (creatinine, cystatin C…) or lesional (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urinary cystatin C…) renal markers and functional (natriuretic peptides…) or lesional (troponin, fatty acid binding protein) cardiac markers. A last kind of biomarkers reflects the dialogue between heart and kidney (renin-angiotensin-aldosteron-system, indicators of activation of arginine vasopressin system) or the systemic impact (inflammation, oxidative stress…). In order to evaluate accurately the complex interactions that are the basis of cardiorenal syndromes, a multi-marker approach seems nowadays necessary.
    08/2013; 71(4):409-418. DOI:10.1684/abc.2013.0877