Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single-centre experience
Department of Urology, Charité University Medicine Berlin Berlin Institute for Urological Research, Berlin Department of Urology, University Teaching Hospital, Offenbach, Germany. BJU International
(Impact Factor: 3.53).
06/2012; 110(11C). DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x
Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Over the past decade, minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and more recently robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy have been introduced and have proven equally effective compared with open surgery in terms of mid-term cancer control and complication rates. Because long-term data is lacking, open prostatectomy is still considered the ‘gold standard’ by some authors, who argue that minimally invasive approaches have to measure up to the excellent long-term results of open surgery.
This study represents one of the largest series (1845 patients) of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy with extended follow-up (11.3 years) and detailed data on oncological outcome and postoperative incontinence. It therefore supplies previously lacking information on these details for minimally invasive prostate surgery and provides important information for patient counselling.
Figures in this publication
Available from: PubMed Central
- "Our findings are likely to be more representative of the overall QoL and prevalence of urinary and sexual dysfunction following LRP for localized prostate cancer compared with previous studies. Such previous studies were limited to single or multiple institutional-based patient series and not based on self-reported data of the patients (7-9). One study—the SPCG 4 study—reported QoL issues after long-term follow-up with retropubic open radical prostatectomy (1). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract Background. Minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has proven equally effective as open surgery in terms of cancer control and peroperative complication rate with less bleeding and postoperative pain. However, long-term follow-up data after LRP are scarce, especially as related to quality of life (QoL). Aim. To compare QoL and functional outcomes at least 10 years after LRP with a population-based control group matched for age and region. Methods. Follow-up data were obtained by mailed questionnaires from patients who responded anonymously to five international questionnaires (EQ-5D, QLQ-C30, QLQ-PR25, IPSS, and IIEF). We collected self-reported outcome data directly from 49 patients who underwent LRP more than 10 years ago in our centre. The results of the patients' overall QoL and urinary continence rates were compared with 918 controls matched for region and age. Results. Forty-two patients (86%) and 808 (88%) controls reported having no urinary leakage. Only 11 patients (24%) still had sexual activities 10 years after LRP, and three were without erectile dysfunction. There was no difference in four of five statements of the self-assessed QoL questionnaires between the LRP and control group. Anxiety level was higher in the LRP group (44%) than in the control group (23%). Conclusion. Patients reported high self-assessed QoL, although they also reported low sexual activity 10 years after LRP. Prevalence of urinary leakage was similar in both groups. However, anxiety was more common in LRP patients.
Upsala journal of medical sciences 12/2013; 119(1). DOI:10.3109/03009734.2013.868560 · 1.98 Impact Factor
Available from: liebertonline.com
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To study the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for the surgical management of localized prostate cancer, we analyzed perioperative parameters and the pattern of complications in our patients who underwent RARP.
After the performance of more than 600 RARP over a 4-year period by a single surgeon using the daVinci® robot system at the Cancer Institute of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, we reviewed the medical records of the first 200 patients retrospectively. All patients were divided into four groups according to the order of case numbers to compare intergroup differences in preoperative characteristics and perioperative parameters. Perioperative complications were determined in all patients, and complications were classified according to the Clavien classification system.
The mean operative time was 212 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 189 mL. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.13 days. Overall, 12% (24 men) experienced various perioperative complications among the 200 patients. Of the total 24 patients, 5 (20.8%) men experienced intraoperative complications, and 19 (79.2%) men showed postoperative complications. Rectal injury occurred in two (8.3%) men, and the injury was repaired primarily using two-layer suture techniques without any sequelae. Three (12.5%) patients had femoral neuropathy, and urinary retention developed in 7 (25.0%) patients. Among our 200 patients, no transfusion was needed intraoperatively and postoperatively. There were nine (4.5%) patients in the Clavien grade I complications category, and another 9 (4.5%) men were classified as grade II complications. Six (3.0%) men had grade IIIb complications, and there were no grade IV or V complications.
In our initial series of RARP procedures, we experienced low morbidity, with the overall complication rate of 12%. After implementing minor modifications, most of the early complications were prevented. Rectal injuries, if recognized intraoperatively, can be repaired primarily.
Journal of endourology / Endourological Society 09/2010; 24(9):1457-61. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0027 · 1.71 Impact Factor
Available from: Nikhil Vasdev
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background and purpose: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is an established treatment option for patients with prostate cancer in selected centres with appropriate expertise. The goal of LRP is to achieve excellent cancer control whilst attempting to preserve normal urinary continence and erectile function. We studied our single-centre experience evaluating the oncological outcomes in patients undergoing LRP. Patients and methods: Three hundred and six patients underwent LRP between 2005 and 2011. Patients were divided into D'Amico low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Results: The mean age was 61.9 years (range 46-74 years). The two most important factors predictive of positive surgical margins (PSMs) at LRP were the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and tumour stage at diagnosis. The overall PSM rate was 26.7%. For low D'Amico-risk patients, the PSM was 24.5%, intermediate-risk patients had a PSM of 32.4%, while high-risk patients had a PSM of 13.6%; 6.4% (nine of 139) of patients sampled had evidence of lymph node-positive disease. Five-year PSA progression-free survival rates were 83% in low-risk patients, 57% in intermediate-risk and 41% in high-risk patients. Conclusion: LRP offers good oncological outcomes in the low- and intermediate-risk groups with low incidence of biochemical recurrence for patients with localised disease. Our high-risk group has a low incidence of PSM and a five-year PSA progression-free survival rate of 41%. Patients with high-risk, but non-metastatic, prostate cancer can be offered a minimally invasive prostatectomy in an experienced centre.
The Journal of urology 04/2013; 6(5). DOI:10.1177/2051415813489553 · 4.47 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.