[Use of SMS to ask mothers to come to vaccination sessions in Bobo-Dioulasso].

Institut supérieur des sciences de la santé (Inssa), 01 BP 1091, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso.
Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique 06/2012; 105(4):291-5.
Source: PubMed


Even though the expanded programme for immunization (EPI) coverage at national level is high in Burkina (95% of fully vaccinated children), mothers of children following EPI in Health Centres (HC) would benefit from being reminded of EPI sessions by sending SMS (short message service) to their own mobile phone, or through mobile phone of a family member living in the same compound. SMS could be sent through Computerized Immunization Registers (CIR), hosted by HC computers. 210 mothers of children aged 0 to 5 years were chosen at random and questioned if they owned a mobile phone, if they could read a SMS, or, if not, what language they would understand if a voice SMS was sent. They were also asked if a family member could receive, read and transmit the message, if mothers did not own a mobile phone. They were also asked if they are willing to give their telephone number to HC. 94% of mothers could be reached through written or voice SMS, sent to their own or family member's mobile phone. 100% of mothers would be willing to give their telephone number to their HC to improve their ability to come at the right time for vaccination sessions. SMS reminders, delivered through CIR, should improve EPI attendance and management of sessions in HC, especially in epidemic context.

Download full-text


Available from: Martin Schlumberger, Sep 11, 2014
20 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the effectiveness of computer-generated telephone reminder and recall messages in increasing preschool immunization visits. Randomized, controlled trial. Fourteen counties in urban and rural Georgia. Children (N = 8002) who were younger than 2 years; had telephone numbers listed in preexisting computerized immunization databases; and were due or late for immunization(s) during the 4-month enrollment period. Households of children were randomized to receive or not receive a general or vaccine-specific computer-generated telephone reminder or recall message the day before the child was due, or immediately after randomization if the child was late. The rates of immunization visits during the 30-day follow-up period. Of the 4636 children whose households were randomized to receive a message, 1684 (36.3%) visited the health department within 30 days compared with 955 (28.4%) of the 3366 children whose households were not contacted (risk ratio [RR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 1.37; P < .01). Immunization visits were more frequent (41.1%) among the 3257 children whose households actually received the message (RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.36 to 1.56; P < .01). Improvement in immunization visits was similar for general and specific messages, greater for recall than reminder messages, and greatest for children who were late for the third dose of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. These data suggest a simple and effective way to increase preschool immunization visits, particularly for vaccines associated with the lowest immunization rates.
    Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 10/1994; 148(9):908-14. · 5.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the use of immunization registry data to supplement missing or incomplete vaccination data reported by immunization providers (referred to as "providers" hereafter) in the National Immunization Survey. Cross-sectional, random-digit-dialing, telephone survey to measure vaccination coverage among children aged 19 to 35 months in the United States. Four sites with mature (with >67% of provider participation in the area) immunization registries. Of the 639 children with complete household interviews, interviewers had consent from the respondents for 569 (89.0%) children to contact their providers and for 556 (87.0%) children to contact both providers and registries. Percentages of children up-to-date for vaccines based on data from providers, registries, and both sources combined. According to provider-reported data, weighted estimates of coverage for the recommended childhood vaccine series 4:3:1:3 at the 4 sites were 65.6%, 78.8%, 81.6%, and 77.0%. According to registry data, these coverage rates were consistently lower: 31.7% (P<.05), 65.4%, 71.9%, and 61.8%, respectively. When all unique vaccine doses were combined from both sources, the pooled 4:3:1:3 coverage rates increased to 72.0%, 92.0%, 88.7%, and 80.2%, respectively. The quality and completeness of vaccination histories from the registries were inconsistent and varied by sites. Vaccination coverage estimates were the lowest when only registry-reported data were used and were the highest when provider- and registry-reported histories were combined. Although registries enrolled and matched more children, vaccination histories were missing, incomplete, and inconsistent. The quality and completeness of the registry data must be improved and must be comparable across all states before further consideration may be given to supplement or replace the provider-reported National Immunization Survey data.
    Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 09/2006; 160(8):838-42. DOI:10.1001/archpedi.160.8.838 · 5.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the completeness and accuracy of parent contact information for the delivery of mailed reminder/recall notices using a statewide immunization information system (IIS). The Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR) was used to generate reminder and recall notifications for children ages 6 months-19 years in Michigan (2008-2009). Mailed notifications were classified as being undeliverable if they were returned to the local health department (LHD) by the US Postal Service. 20,377 notifications were mailed and 5182 (26%) were undeliverable. Undeliverable notification increased with age (reference, 6-18 months): 19-35 months (OR=1.27), 36-71 months (OR=3.03) and adolescents 11-19 years (OR=4.94). Children enrolled in Medicaid (OR=0.76) were less likely to have an undeliverable notification compared to their non-enrolled counterparts, but children who had previously received some (OR=1.07) or all vaccinations (OR=2.43) at an LHD were more likely to have an undeliverable notification. Undeliverable reminder/recall notifications are most likely among adolescents. Efforts to identify alternate sources of parent contact information may be an important strategy to improve the successful delivery of reminder/recall notifications, especially for adolescents.
    Preventive Medicine 12/2011; 53(6):424-6. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.014 · 3.09 Impact Factor
Show more