Retrofitting an atomic force microscope with photothermal excitation for a clean cantilever response in low Q environments

Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T8, Canada.
The Review of scientific instruments (Impact Factor: 1.58). 05/2012; 83(5):053703. DOI: 10.1063/1.4712286
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is well known that the low-Q regime in dynamic atomic force microscopy is afflicted by instrumental artifacts (known as "the forest of peaks") caused by piezoacoustic excitation of the cantilever. In this article, we unveil additional issues associated with piezoacoustic excitation that become apparent and problematic at low Q values. We present the design of a photothermal excitation system that resolves these issues, and demonstrate its performance on force spectroscopy at the interface of gold and an ionic liquid with an overdamped cantilever (Q < 0.5). Finally, challenges in the interpretation of low-Q dynamic AFM measurements are discussed.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper reports the development of microcantilevers capable of self-heating and Lorentz-force actuation, and demonstrates applications to thermal topography imaging. Electrical current passing through a U-shaped cantilever in the presence of a magnetic field induces a Lorentz force on the cantilever free end, resulting in cantilever actuation. This same current flowing through a resistive heater induces a controllable temperature increase. We present cantilevers designed for large actuation forces for a given cantilever temperature increase. We analyze the designs of two new cantilevers, along with a legacy cantilever design. The cantilevers are designed to have a spring constant of about 1.5 N m−1, a resonant frequency near 100 kHz, and self-heating capability with temperature controllable over the range 25–600 °C. Compared to previous reports on self-heating cantilevers, the Lorentz–thermal cantilevers generate up to seven times as much Lorentz force and two times as much oscillation amplitude. When used for thermal topography imaging, the Lorentz–thermal cantilevers can measure topography with a vertical resolution of 0.2 nm.
    Nanotechnology 09/2014; 25(39):395501. DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/25/39/395501 · 3.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In photo-thermal actuation, heat is added locally to a micro-cantilever by means of a laser. A fraction of the irradiation is absorbed, yielding thermal stresses and deformations in the structure. Harmonic modulation of the laser power causes the cantilever to oscillate. Moreover, a phase lag is introduced which is very sensitive to the spot location and the cantilever properties. This phase lag is theoretically predicted and experimentally verified. Combined with thermo-mechanical properties of the cantilever and its geometry, the location of the laser spot, the thermal diffusivity, and the layer thicknesses of the cantilever can be extracted.
    Applied Physics Letters 08/2014; 105(7):073109-073109-4. DOI:10.1063/1.4893461 · 3.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multifrequency atomic force microscopy imaging has been recently demonstrated as a powerful technique for quickly obtaining information about the mechanical properties of a sample. Combining this development with recent gains in imaging speed through small cantilevers holds the promise of a convenient, high-speed method for obtaining nanoscale topography as well as mechanical properties. Nevertheless, instrument bandwidth limitations on cantilever excitation and readout have restricted the ability of multifrequency techniques to fully benefit from small cantilevers. We present an approach for cantilever excitation and deflection readout with a bandwidth of 20 MHz, enabling multifrequency techniques extended beyond 2 MHz for obtaining materials contrast in liquid and air, as well as soft imaging of delicate biological samples.
    Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 01/2014; 5:2459-2467. DOI:10.3762/bjnano.5.255 · 2.33 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014

View other sources