Article

Radiation exposure with the RVG-S and conventional intraoral X-ray film

Oral Radiology (Impact Factor: 0.17). 05/1994; 10(1):33-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF02348012

ABSTRACT The exposure required to obtain optimal image quality was determined using conventional intraoral x-ray film (Eastman Kodak,
Rochester, NY) and the RVG-S Radio VisioGraphy-S: Trophy Radiology, Vincennes, France) CCD-based intraoral radiographic imaging
system. The RVG-S permitted dose reductions of 50 to 65% for individual exposures in comparison with Ektaspeed film, and 73
to 76% when compared to Ultraspeed film. The dose dynamic for the RVG-S was 8.6 times narrower than that for conventional
film. Perception of low contrast details was not significantly different between either type of x-ray film and the RVG-S.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
391 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tissue doses for a modified Rando head-and-neck phantom were measured for imaging with speed group E film with standardized aluminium filtration and the RVG-S both with and without added niobium filtration. Cylindrical holes drilled into the phantom's tissue-equivalent material permitted the placement of a small ionization chamber into anatomically correct sites representing the thyroid, parotid, submandibular and sublingual glands. To establish the necessary cone positions, angulations and time settings for each exposure, diagostically acceptable images of six teeth, representative of different intraoral regions, were made for a DXXTR mannequin. Entrance and exit points were marked and transferred to the phantom to allow reproducible repeat exposures. The RVG-S provided reductions in average skin entrance dose of 31 per cent to 39 per cent with standard aluminium filtration and 51 per cent to 60 per cent with the addition of niobium filtration to attenuate the beam. While dose reductions relative to E-speed film usage were found for deep tissue sites, these were site and projection specific. The cumulative reduction from use of the RVG-S without niobium filtration was 32 per cent. It was 42 per cent with additional niobium filtration. It should be noted, however, that adding niobium filtration resulted in increased dosages to the deeper soft tissues such as the thyroid gland.
    Australian Dental Journal 09/1997; 42(5):335 - 342. · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radiographic information on the imaging plate was read with a pixel size of 50 μm×50 μm and recorded with 100 μm×100 μm. Various frequency-enhanced images were produced by an unsharp masking process that can maximize the spatial frequency enhancement at 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, and 4.00 cycles/mm. Using these images, the effect of frequency enhancement processing for the X-ray diagnosis of normal anatomical structures and simulated bone changes on intraoral computed radiography was investigated. The imaging conditions under which the most valuable radiographic images for diagnosis of normal anatomical structures were obtained was a frequency type that diminished the low level density area, a non-linear gradation and an enhancement rank of 4 at the spatial frequency of 2.00 cycles/mm. These iamges projected a higher image quality than conventional periapical films. In addition, the intraoral computed radiography had equivalent or better ability to detect fine-simulated bone changes compared to conventional periapical films. These findings suggest that the spatial frequency enhancement area needed to obtain images with significant diagnostic value, equivalent to or better than conventional periapical film images, is 2.00 cycles/mm in intraoral computed radiography, with maximal spatial resolution of 5.00 cycles/mm.
    Oral Radiology 11/1996; 12(2):27-38. · 0.17 Impact Factor