Fluidized-bed extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil samples

Chromatographia (Impact Factor: 1.41). 04/2002; 55(7):467-473. DOI: 10.1007/BF02492279


Due to the carcinogenity and ubiquity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the environment they are of ongoing interest
to analytical chemistry. In this study, a comparison of the classic Soxhlet extraction and, fluidized-bed extraction, has
been conducted. The extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by this technique has been optimized considering as experimental
variables the variation of the number of extraction cycles and the holding time after reaching the heating temperature by
means of a surface response design. The significance of the operational parameters of the fluidized-bed extraction on the
performance characteristics has been investigated. For the determination of the analytes a selective clean-up of the extracts
followed by a fast gas chromatography method with mass spectrometric detection was used, resulting in low limits of detection
(0.2 pg μL−1). The accuracy of the complete analytical method was established by extraction and analysis of reference materials.

1 Follower
27 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the present study accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was investigated for the extraction of organochlorine pesticides from animal feed. The factors influencing the extraction efficiency including extraction temperature, static extraction time and composition of extraction solvent were optimized using response surface methods. Clean-up of the extracts was performed by a two-step procedure including silica gel adsorption and gel permeation chromatography. Finally, the target compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometric detection. In addition, the complete analytical procedure was validated by parallel analysis of the certified reference material BCR 115. The results were in good accordance with the certified values. ASE could provide excellent extraction efficiency and good reproducibility in short time and with reduced organic solvent consumption.
    Chromatographia 10/2003; 58(9):631-636. DOI:10.1365/s10337-003-0074-y · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years, the classical Soxhlet extraction of PAHs and PCBs from matrices such as soil, sediments, sludges and related matrices has been substituted by faster and less-solvent-consuming automated techniques. This paper describes the performance characteristics of fluidized-bed extraction (FBE), which has been compared to other approaches and been optimized using a quality control material.SI-traceable reference materials from the European Commission have been used to validate the developed method and establish an analytical protocol. Good correlations with Soxhlet extraction were observed and certified values of the CRMs used, could be confirmed in all cases.
    Analytica Chimica Acta 11/2004; 527(1-527):53-60. DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.028 · 4.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An analytical method has been developed for the quantification of two herbicides (ethidimuron and methabenzthiazuron) and their two main soil derivatives. This method involves fluidized-bed extraction (FBE) prior to cleanup and analysis by reverse-phase liquid chromatography with UV detection at 282 nm. FBE conditions were established to provide efficient extraction without degradation of the four analytes. (14)C-labeled compounds were used for the optimization of extraction and purification steps and for the determination of related efficiencies. Extraction was optimal using a fexIKA extractor operating at 110 degrees C for three cycles (total time = 95 min) with 75 g of soil and 150 mL of a 60:40 v/v acetone/water mixture. Extracts were further purified on a 500 mg silica SPE cartridge. Separation was performed on a C18 Purosphere column (250 mm x 4 mm i.d.), at 0.8 mL min(-1) and 30 degrees C with an elution gradient made up of phosphoric acid aqueous solution (pH 2.2) and acetonitrile. Calibration curves were found to be linear in the 0.5-50 mg L(-1) concentration range. Besides freshly spiked soil samples, method validation included the analysis of samples with aged residues. Recovery values, determined from spiked samples, were close to 100%. Limits of detection ranged between 2 and 3 microg kg(-1) of dry soil and limits of quantification between 8 and 10 microg kg(-1) of dry soil. An attempt to improve these performances by using fluorescence detection following postcolumn derivatization by orthophthalaldehyde-mercaptoethanol reagent was unsuccessful.
    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 11/2006; 54(20):7450-9. DOI:10.1021/jf061042v · 2.91 Impact Factor
Show more