Article

What ‘animal models’ can and cannot tell ornithologists about the genetics of wild populations

148:633-642. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-007-0191-8

ABSTRACT Good estimates of the genetic parameters of natural populations, such as heritability, are essential for both understanding
how genetic variation is maintained and estimating a population’s evolutionary potential. Long-term studies on birds are especially
amenable for calculating such estimates because of the ease with which pedigrees can be inferred. Recent ‘animal model’ methodology,
originally developed by animal breeders to identify animals of high genetic merit, has been applied to natural bird populations
of known pedigree. Animal models are more powerful than traditional analyses such as parent–offspring regression because they
use all of the available pedigree information simultaneously. In doing so, they can accommodate common phenomena like selection
and inbreeding and are especially suitable for the complex and incomplete pedigrees typical of natural populations. Animal
models not only provide a better way of estimating genetic and environmental variance components, they also allow individual
phenotypes to be separated into their genetic and environmental components. Here we aim to provide the interested ornithologist
with an accessible entry into the vast and sometimes daunting quantitative genetics literature and, in particular, into the
literature on the animal model. We outline not only the possibilities offered by the animal model for the accurate estimation
of genetic parameters in the wild but also associated potential pitfalls and limitations. On the whole, we aim to provide
an accessible and up-to-date overview of the rapidly developing and exciting field of evolutionary genetics applied to long-term
studies of wild bird populations.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
75 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Climate change is expected to induce many ecological and evolutionary changes. Among these is the hypothesis that climate warming will cause a reduction in body size. This hypothesis stems from Bergmann's rule, a trend whereby species exhibit a smaller body size in warmer climates, and larger body size under colder conditions in endotherms. The mechanisms behind this rule are still debated, and it is not clear whether Bergmann's rule can be extended to predict the effects of climate change through time. We reviewed the primary literature for evidence (i) of a decrease in body size in response to climate warming, (ii) that changing body size is an adaptive response and (iii) that these responses are evolutionary or plastic. We found weak evidence for changes in body size through time as predicted by Bergmann's rule. Only three studies investigated the adaptive nature of these size decreases. Of these, none reported evidence of selection for smaller size or of a genetic basis for the size change, suggesting that size decreases could be due to nonadaptive plasticity in response to changing environmental conditions. More studies are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn about the underlying causes of these changes in body size in response to a warming climate.
    Evolutionary Applications 01/2014; 7(1):156-68. · 4.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adaptation depends on the additive genetic variance for fitness and its component traits. Yet estimating additive genetic variance and heritability for wild populations is challenging because determining relatedness of individuals is difficult. We used 20 years (1994–2013) of phenotypic records from mark-recapture data and a multi-generational pedigree to estimate quantitative genetic variation in three fitness-related traits in Great Lakes piping plovers (Charadrius melodus), an endangered wild shorebird. Genetic and environmental components of variance as well as heritabilities were estimated using Bayesian inference for animal models. Phenotypic variation in age-corrected chick mass was composed of a significant additive genetic component (h2 = 0.27; 95% credible interval: 0.16–0.38), and hatch year, common maternal environment, and hatch site effects. Conversely, natal dispersal distance and female breeding time were not significantly heritable (h2 = 0.03; 95% CI: 0.0–0.11; h2 = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.0–0.22, respectively). Rather, environmental factors (e.g., breeding site) are the main sources of variation in these two traits. Variation in female breeding time was minimally influenced by her mate and was moderately repeatable. The low potential for natal dispersal and breeding time to evolve may limit the ability of this population to adapt to climate change long-term. However, trait alteration could occur by a phenotypically plastic response, allowing rapid adjustment to novel environmental conditions and short-term persistence. Depending on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental influences on the trait(s) of interest, results from quantitative genetic studies can also help identify management priorities for endangered populations.
    Biological Conservation 09/2014; 177:26–34. · 3.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food shortage is a common situation in nature but little is known about the strategies animals use to overcome it. This lack of knowledge is especially true for outbreaking insects, which commonly experience nutritional stress for several successive generations when they reach high population densities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the life history consequences of chronic nutritional stress in the outbreaking moth Choristoneura fumiferana. Larvae were reared on two different artificial diets that emulate nutritional conditions larvae face during their natural population density cycle (low and medium quality artificial diets). After four generations, a subset of larvae was fed on the same diet as their parents, and another on the opposite diet. We explored larval life-history strategies to cope with nutritional stress, its associated costs and the influence of nutritional conditions experienced in the parental generation. We found no evidence of nutritional stress in the parental generation increasing offspring ability to feed on low quality diet, but the contrary: compared to offspring from parents that were fed a medium quality diet, larvae from parents fed a low quality diet had increased mortality, reduced growth rate and reduced female reproductive output. Our results support a simple stress hypothesis because the negative effects of malnutrition accumulated over successive generations. Density-dependent deterioration in plant quality is thought to be an important factor governing the population dynamics of outbreaking insects and we hypothesize that chronic nutritional stress can be a driver of outbreak declines of C. fumiferana, and of forest insects in general.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(2):e88039. · 3.53 Impact Factor