The poorer member states of the EC are often disappointed at what they see as a very limited degree of redistribution of resources
away from the richer members towards the less well off. In a recent paper to the intergovernmental conference (IGC) on political
union, for example, Spain calls for a number of measures, including explicit inter-state budget transfers, in order to increase
the rate of convergence of income levels across member states. The purpose of this paper is to review the degree of redistribution
entailed by the EC budget system as it works at present and to make some conjectures about the implications of pursuing the
"One of the sensitive questions which arises in discussion of European international integration is whether or not net contributions to the EC budget are borne equitably by member countries. That member states are concerned about their respective positions is evident both from the heated disputes in the early 1980's over UK contributions and from the continued pressure to address problems perceived by new members such as Spain and Portugal (Shackelton 1989; Bowles and Jones 1991a). "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This paper presents an empirical analysis of the EC budget over the period 1985-89. It begins from the premise that economic variables influence both a member state's contributions to the finance of the budget and its receipts under the various spending programmes. We examine this hypothesis using data from 5 years relating to all EC members. A regression model is fitted in order to establish whether (and to what degree) a member state's contributions to the budget and the receipts it can expect under the main budget heads, are likely to increase with the country's income. The principal findings are that a country's GDP is an accurate guide to the contributions it can expect to make but a much less reliable guide to receipts. The result is that net contributions are not strongly correlated with GDP. We find also that economic indicators such as unemployment rates and the proportion of the population employed in agriculture have limited additional explanatory power. The paper extends the analysis by exploring how the position might have changed had recent moves to switch more EC spending from agricultural price support to structural measures taken place earlier. This simulation assumes that the structural part of the budget had been expanded while the agricultural price support remained the same, the extra spending being financed by a proportionate increase in contributions. It emerges that such measures would have made a member's net contributions slightly more sensitive to GDP. But it would not have been sufficient to give the budget a significant role in terms of redistributing income from poorer member states to richer ones.
Journal of European Social Policy 05/1992; 2(2):87-106. DOI:10.1177/095892879200200202 · 1.36 Impact Factor
Note: This list is based on the publications in our database and might not be exhaustive.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.