Article
A systematic review of interventions in primary care to improve health literacy for chronic disease behavioral risk factors.
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia. .
BMC Family Practice (impact factor:
1.8).
06/2012;
13:49.
DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-13-49
pp.49
Source: PubMed
- Citations (3)
-
Cited In (0)
-
Article: Effects of COPD self-care management education at a nurse-led primary health care clinic.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is disabling, with symptoms such as chronic cough, phlegm, wheezing, shortness of breath and increased infections of the respiratory passage. The aim was to examine the effects of a structured educational intervention programme at a nurse-led primary health care clinic (PHCC) on quality of life (QoL), knowledge about COPD and smoking cessation in patients with COPD. This study had an experimental design in which 52 patients with COPD from a Swedish primary care setting were randomized into two groups (intervention or control). Both groups received standard care but patients in the intervention group were also offered two visits to a nurse specialized in COPD care. The purpose of the visits was to increase the patients' self-care ability and their knowledge about COPD. The study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Data were collected using two questionnaires, one pertaining to knowledge about COPD and smoking habits and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, addressing how QoL was affected by the patients' respiratory symptoms. The intervention and control groups answered both questionnaires on their first and last visits to the PHCC. A statistically significant increase was noted in the intervention group on QoL, the number of patients who stopped smoking and patients' knowledge about COPD at the follow-up, 3-5 months after intervention. However, a confounding factor may have been that one of the researchers (Eva Osterlund Efraimsson), as a nurse in the PHCC, performed the intervention. This implies that patients were in a dependent relationship which may have affected the responses in a favourable direction. Our findings show that conventional care alone did not have an effect on patients' QoL and smoking habits. Instead, the evidence suggests that a structured programme with self-care education is needed to motivate patients for life-style changes.Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 07/2008; 22(2):178-85. · 0.89 Impact Factor -
Article: Physical activity measurements affected participants' behavior in a randomized controlled trial.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Assessing levels and determinants of physical activity as outcome measurements might have an independent effect on participant's physical activity behavior. The objective is to study this effect in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) promoting regular physical activity in Dutch general practice. Using a Solomon four-group design, participants were randomized twice. After randomization to a control or intervention-condition at general practice level (N = 29), participants were randomized to a group participating in measurements at baseline, 2 and 6 months (3M-group, N = 361), or a group only participating in measurements at 6 months (1M-group, N = 356). Outcome measures assessed at 6 months included: level of physical activity (self-reported and objectively measured with accelerometry), meeting ACSM/CDC guideline for regular physical activity, stage of change, and determinants of physical activity. Follow-up data on 635 participants (89%) was collected. Statistically significant measurement effects were found for meeting the ACSM/CDC guideline (self-reported), self-efficacy for resisting relapse, knowledge, and on awareness. Other outcome measures showed positive trends, except stages of change. Measurements of physical activity affect participant's physical activity behavior, possibly triggered by a raised awareness about their own physical activity level. Implications for future research are discussed, as well as methodologic limitations of the study design.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 05/2006; 59(4):404-11. · 4.27 Impact Factor -
Article: Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To achieve the Healthy People 2000 objectives, public health professionals must develop effective dietary interventions that address psychosocial and behavioral components of change. This study tested the effect of individually computer-tailored messages designed to decrease fat intake and increase fruit and vegetable intake. Adult patients from four North Carolina family practices were surveyed at baseline and then randomly assigned to one of two interventions or to a control group. The first intervention consisted of individually computer-tailored nutrition messages; the second consisted of nontailored nutrition information based on the 1990 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Patients were resurveyed 4 months postintervention. The tailored intervention produced significant decreases in total fat and saturated fat scores compared with those of the control group (P < .05). Total fat was decreased in the tailored group by 23%, in the nontailored group by 9%, and in the control group by 3%. Fruit and vegetable consumption did not increase in any study group. Seventy-three percent of the tailored intervention group recalled receiving a message, compared with 33% of the nontailored intervention group. Tailored nutrition messages are effective in promoting dietary fat reduction for disease prevention.American Journal of Public Health 06/1994; 84(5):783-7. · 3.93 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
52 studies
behavioral risk factors
community settings
different intervention types
Economic Co-operation
Effectiveness studies
health literacy
High ≥ 8 points
intensity interventions
low intensity interventions
Low ≤ 3 points
multiple interventions
physical activity
physical activity interventions
primary health
quasi-experimental studies
risk behavior
smoking cessation
SNAPW outcome
varying intensity