Strategies for the discovery and development of therapies for metastatic breast cancer

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
dressNature Reviews Drug Discovery (Impact Factor: 37.23). 06/2012; 11(6):479-97. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2372
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nearly all deaths caused by solid cancers occur as a result of metastasis--the formation of secondary tumours in distant organs such as the lungs, liver, brain and bone. A major obstruction to the development of drugs with anti-metastatic efficacy is our fragmented understanding of how tumours 'evolve' and metastasize, at both the biological and genetic levels. Furthermore, although there is significant overlap in the metastatic process among different types of cancer, there are also marked differences in the propensity to metastasize, the extent of metastasis, the sites to which the tumour metastasizes, the kinetics of the process and the mechanisms involved. Here, we consider the case of breast cancer, which has some marked distinguishing features compared with other types of cancer. Considerable progress has been made in the development of preclinical models and in the identification of relevant signalling pathways and genetic regulators of metastatic breast cancer, and we discuss how these might facilitate the development of novel targeted anti-metastatic drugs.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metastatic cases of breast cancer pose the primary challenge in clinical management of this disease, demanding the identification of effective therapeutic strategies that remain wanting. In this study, we report that elevated levels of α-tubulin acetylation are a sufficient cause of metastatic potential in breast cancer. In suspended cell culture conditions, metastatic breast cancer cells exhibited high α-tubulin acetylation levels that extended along microtentacle (McTN) protrusions. Mutation of the acetylation site on α-tubulin and enzymatic modulation of this posttranslational modification exerted a significant impact on McTN frequency and the reattachment of suspended tumor cells. Reducing α-tubulin acetylation significantly inhibited migration but did not affect proliferation. In an analysis of more than 140 matched primary and metastatic tumors from patients, we found that acetylation was maintained and in many cases increased in lymph node metastases compared with primary tumors. Proteomic analysis of an independent cohort of more than 390 patient specimens further documented the relationship between increased α-tubulin acetylation and the aggressive behaviors of basal-like breast cancers, with a trend toward increased risk of disease progression and death in patients with high-intensity α-tubulin acetylation in primary tumors. Taken together, our results identify a tight correlation between acetylated α-tubulin levels and aggressive metastatic behavior in breast cancer, with potential implications for the definition of a simple prognostic biomarker in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Res; 75(1); 1-13. ©2014 AACR. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.
    Cancer Research 12/2014; 75(1). DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3563 · 9.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevention and treatment of lung metastasis of breast cancer remain a major challenge. The vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) could provide a potential therapeutic target in lung metastasis. Herein, succinobucol (SCB), a water-insoluble potent and selective VCAM-1 inhibitor, was assembled with triblock polymer poloxamer P188 into nanoparticles due to the intermolecular hydrophobic interactions. The experimental results showed that the SCB loaded nanoparticles (SN) could greatly improve the oral delivery and suppress the lung metastasis of breast cancer. The cell migration and invasion abilities of metastatic 4T1 breast cancer cells were obviously inhibited by SN. Moreover, the VCAM-1 expression on 4T1 cells was significantly reduced by SN, and the cell-cell binding ratio of RAW 264.7 cells to 4T1 cells greatly decreased from 47.4% to 3.2%. Furthermore, the oral bioavailability of SCB was greatly improved about 13-fold by SN, and the biodistribution in major organs was evidently enhanced. In particular, in the metastatic breast cancer model, the lung metastasis was notably reduced by SN treatment, and the VCAM-1 expression in lung tissues was significantly inhibited. Thereby, SN could evoke a new effective therapeutic efficacy of SCB on lung metastasis of breast cancer by inhibition of VCAM-1 expression. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Journal of Controlled Release 01/2015; 205. DOI:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.015 · 7.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to identify genes and molecular pathways differentially regulated by synchrotron-generated microbeams (MRT) versus conventional radiotherapy (CRT) beams in vitro using cultured EMT6.5 cells. We hypothesized (based on previous findings) that gene expression and molecular pathway changes after MRT are different from those seen after CRT. We found that at 24 h postirradiation, MRT exerts a broader regulatory effect on multiple pathways than CRT. MRT regulated those pathways involved in gene transcription, translation initiation, macromolecule metabolism, oxidoreductase activity and signaling transduction in a different manner compared to CRT. We also found that MRT/CRT alone, or when combined with inflammatory factor lipopolysaccharide, upregulated expression of Ccl2, Ccl5 or Csf2, which are involved in host immune cell recruitment. Our findings demonstrated differences in the molecular pathway for MRT versus CRT in the cultured tumor cells, and were consistent with the idea that radiation plays a role in recruiting tumor-associated immune cells to the tumor. Our results also suggest that a combination of MRT/CRT with a treatment targeting CCL2 or Csf2 could repress the tumor-associated immune cell recruitment, delay tumor growth and/or metastasis and yield better tumor control than radiation alone.
    Radiation Research 11/2014; 182(6). DOI:10.1667/RR13778.1 · 2.45 Impact Factor