Article
Does the new standard for eugenol designed to protect against contact sensitization protect those sensitized from elicitation of the reaction?
From the *Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; †Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; and ‡Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Dermatitis (impact factor:
1.21).
01/2012;
23(1):32-8.
DOI:10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d17b8
pp.32-8
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
-
Cited In (0)
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
3-week ROAT
acceptable exposure levels
allergic contact dermatitis
concentration limited
current International Fragrance Association Standard
dermal sensitization
elicit allergic contact dermatitis
elicitation concentrations
eugenol-sensitized patients
false-negative result
fragrance ingredients
International Fragrance Association standard
open application tests
positive ROAT
Potential fragrance allergens
quantitative relationship
quantitative risk assessment
quantitative risk assessment-based risk management procedures
ROATs
various concentrations