Article

Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) Accuracy and Efficacy Compared with Flow Probe and Transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM): An Ovine Cardiac Output Validation.

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 3010, Australia.
Critical care research and practice 01/2012; 2012:621496. DOI: 10.1155/2012/621496
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background. The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is an accepted clinical method of measuring cardiac output (CO) despite no prior validation. The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) is a noninvasive alternative to PAC using Doppler ultrasound (CW). We compared PAC and USCOM CO measurements against a gold standard, the aortic flow probe (FP), in sheep at varying outputs. Methods. Ten conscious sheep, with implanted FPs, had measurements of CO by FP, USCOM, and PAC, at rest and during intervention with inotropes and vasopressors. Results. CO measurements by FP, PAC, and USCOM were 4.0 ± 1.2 L/min, 4.8 ± 1.5 L/min, and 4.0 ± 1.4 L/min, respectively, (n = 280, range 1.9 L/min to 11.7 L/min). Percentage bias and precision between FP and PAC, and FP and USCOM was -17 and 47%, and 1 and 36%, respectively. PAC under-measured Dobutamine-induced CO changes by 20% (relative 66%) compared with FP, while USCOM measures varied from FP by 3% (relative 10%). PAC reliably detected -30% but not +40% CO changes, as measured by receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), while USCOM reliably detected ±5% changes in CO (AUC > 0.70). Conclusions. PAC demonstrated poor accuracy and sensitivity as a measure of CO. USCOM provided equivalent measurements to FP across a sixfold range of outputs, reliably detecting ±5% changes.

1 Bookmark
 · 
236 Views
  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 01/2014; 15(1):84-5. · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Supra-sternal Doppler (USCOM Ltd., Sydney, Australia) can be used during anaesthesia to measure cardiac output (CO) and related flow parameters. However, before the USCOM can be used routinely, its utility and limitations need to be fully understood and critical information about its use disseminated. In "Window to the Circulation" we use the example of an elderly man undergoing major urological robotic surgery to highlight the utility and limitations of intra-operative USCOM use. USCOM readings were verified against oesophageal Doppler. Despite the lack of major blood loss (<500 ml in 8-h), significant changes in haemodynamics were recorded. CO ranged from 3.2 to 8.3 l/min. The quality of USCOM scans and reliability of data was initially poor, but improved as CO increased as surgery progressed. When USCOM scans became acceptable the correlation with oesophageal Doppler was R(2) = 8.0 (p < 0.001). Several characteristic features of the supra-sternal Doppler scans were identified: Aortic and pulmonary flow waves, valve closure, E and A waves, false A-wave and aberrant arterial flow patterns. Their identification helped with identifying the main flow signal across the aortic valve. The USCOM has the potential to monitor changes in CO and related flow parameters intra-operatively and thus help the anaesthetist to more fully understand the patient's haemodynamics. However, achieving a good quality scan is important as it improves the reliability of USCOM data. The supra-sternal route is rich in flow signals and identifying the aortic valve signal is paramount. Recognizing the other characteristic waveforms in the signal helps greatly.
    International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 08/2013;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fluid infusion is one of the most common critical care interventions, yet approximately 50 % of all fluid interventions are unnecessary and potentially harmful. An improved approach to identification of fluid responsiveness is of clinical importance. Currently fluid responsiveness is most frequently identified by blood pressure (BP) measurements or a surrogate. However fluid responsiveness is simply the increase in stroke volume (SV) associated with volume expansion, and may not be reflected in BP or BP surrogates. Guyton demonstrated that BP = CO x SVR, and it is know that baroreceptor mediated autonomic nervous system regulation of SV and SVR to preserve BP may mask significant and critical changes in haemodynamics. Dr Pinsky in his recent J Clin Monit Comput Editorial evaluated the relative merits of pulse pressure variability (PPV) methods, a variant on BP measurement, for assessment of fluid responsiveness and promoted the use of physiologic challenges to augment the applicability of PPV. However this guidance is only half right. This letter reminds clinicians of the physiologic limitations of PPV as a measure of fluid responsiveness, even when combined with physiologic challenges, and recommends the replacement of BP with SV measurements. The combination of accurate Doppler measurement of SV and physiologic challenges, as Dr Pinsky recommends, is a physiologically rational and effective approach to identification of fluid responsiveness with established evidence. The direct monitoring of SV and SV changes has the potential to improve a long standing critical care and anaesthetic conundrum; when to give fluid and when to stop.
    Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. 07/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
36 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014