Article

Removal of iopromide and degradation characteristics in electron beam irradiation process.

Department of Environmental Engineering (YIEST), Yonsei University, Heungup, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Journal of hazardous materials (Impact Factor: 4.14). 05/2012; 227-228:126-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.022
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to evaluate the removal efficiency of iopromide using electron beam (E-beam) irradiation technology, and its degradation characteristics with hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydrated electron (e(aq)(-)). Studies are conducted with different initial concentrations of iopromide in pure water and in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, bicarbonate ion, or sulfite ion. E-beam absorbed dose of 19.6 kGy was required to achieve 90% degradation of 100 μM iopromide and the E-beam/H(2)O(2) system increased the removal efficiency by an amount of OH· generation. In the presence of OH scavengers (10 mM sulfite ion), the required dose for 90% removal of 100 μM iopromide was only 0.9 kGy. This greatly enhanced removal was achieved in the presence of OH· scavengers, which was rather unexpected and unlike the results obtained from most advanced oxidation process (AOP) experiments. The reasons for this enhancement can be explained by a kinetic study using the bimolecular rate constants of each reaction species. To explore the reaction scheme of iopromide with OH· or e(aq)(-) and the percent of mineralization for the two reaction paths, the total organic carbon (TOC), released iodide, and intermediates were analyzed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
85 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main objective of this study was to conduct an exhaustive review of the literature on the presence of pharmaceutical-derived compounds in water and on their removal. The most representative pharmaceutical families found in water were described and related water pollution issues were analyzed. The performances of different water treatment systems in the removal of pharmaceuticals were also summarized. The water treatment technologies were those based on conventional systems (chlorine, chlorine dioxide, wastewater treatment plants), adsorption/bioadsorption on activated carbon (from lotus stalks, olive-waste cake, coal, wood, plastic waste, cork powder waste, peach stones, coconut shell, rice husk), and advanced oxidation processes by means of ozonation (O3, O3/H2O2, O3/activated carbon, O3/biological treatment), photooxidation (UV, UV/H2O2, UV/K2S2O8, UV/TiO2, UV/H2O2/TiO2, UV/TiO2/activated carbon, photo-Fenton), radiolysis (e-Beam, (60)Co, (137)Cs. Additives used: H2O2, SO3(2-), HCO3(-), CH3OH, CO3(2-), or NO3(-)), and electrochemical processes (Electrooxidation without and with active chlorine generation). The effect of these treatments on pharmaceutical compounds and the advantages and disadvantages of different methodologies used were described. The most important parameters of the above water treatment systems (experimental conditions, removal yield, pharmaceutical compound mineralization, TOC removal, toxicity evolution) were indicated. The key publications on pharmaceutical removal from water were summarized.
    Chemosphere 09/2013; · 3.14 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
8 Downloads
Available from
Jun 30, 2014