Article

Clinical outcome of central conventional chondrosarcoma.

IV Department of Orthopaedics, University of Bologna, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Journal of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.64). 05/2012; DOI: 10.1002/jso.23173
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study was to analyze (1) survival, local recurrence (LR), and metastasis rates between the three histological tumor grades; (2) whether type of treatment and tumor site influenced prognosis for each histologic grade. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 296 patients with central conventional chondrosarcomas (CS) (87 grade 1, 162 grade 2, and 47 grade 3). The femur was the most common site (91 cases), followed by the pelvis (82) and other less frequent sites. Type of surgery was related with histologic grade. Margins were wide in 222 cases, marginal in 23, and intralesional in 51 cases. RESULTS: At a mean of 7 years, 201 patients remained continuously NED, 33 were NED after treatment of relapse, 15 were AWD, 35 were died of disease, and 12 of other causes. Survival was 92% at 5 years and 84% at 10 years, significantly influenced by histological grading. In grade 3 CS, two factors influenced survival: type of surgery (resection vs. amputation, P = 0.051) and site (P = 0.039). The two significant factors lost their significance at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Central conventional CS with low/intermediate grade has a good prognosis, while high-grade tumors have poor outcome. Tumor relapses are strictly related with histologic grade. J. Surg. Oncol © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
123 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conditional survival measures change in the risk of mortality given that a patient has survived a defined period of time. This has yet to be reported for chondrosarcoma of bone. This information should be of interest to the clinician and helpful in counseling patients with chondrosarcoma. Our questions include the following: (1) Does the conditional survival of patients with local/regional chondrosarcoma improve with each additional year of survival? (2) Does the conditional survival of patients with metastatic chondrosarcoma improve with each additional year of survival? (3) Does tumor location, use of radiation, or patient age affect conditional survival? (4) Can chondrosarcoma ever be considered cured? We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database maintained by the National Cancer Institute to identify 2138 patients with chondrosarcoma of bone from 1973 to 2009. We used an actuarial life table analysis to explore differences in 5-year cause-specific survival estimates conditional on 1 to 5 years of survival. The cohort was stratified by grade, location (axial versus extremity), use of radiation, and age. Finally, we expanded the analysis to include survival estimates 20 years after diagnosis conditional on survival for 5 and 10 years. The estimated survival for all grades of local/regional chondrosarcoma improved from baseline with each year of survival after diagnosis. At 5 years after diagnosis, local/regional Grade 1 chondrosarcoma displayed higher conditional survival than Grade 2 and 3 local/regional chondrosarcoma (97.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 95.2%-98.4%] versus 92.8% [95% CI, 89.5%-95.0%], p = 0.006 and 83.8% [95% CI, 69.9%-91.7%], p = 0.012). Estimated survival improved from baseline with each year of survival for all grades of metastatic chondrosarcoma. Conditional survival estimates for Grade 3 axial tumors failed to improve from baseline to 5 years after diagnosis (52.9% versus 70.2%, p > 0.05) compared with Grade 3 extremity tumors at baseline and 5 years after diagnosis (58.1% versus 95.8%, p < 0.0001) The 20-year conditional survival estimates reveal that a cancer-specific risk of mortality exists even 10 years after diagnosis, suggesting that although the conditional survival increases considerably over time, it cannot be considered cured. The 5-year conditional survival estimate for patients with chondrosarcoma improved with each additional year of survival regardless of grade, site, age, or use of radiation. At 10 years after diagnosis, deaths attributable to cancer were still present, and patients should be aware of this small long-term risk. Level II, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 04/2014; · 2.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Growing evidences indicate that the histone methyltransferase EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) may be an appropriate therapeutic target in some tumors. Indeed, a high expression of EZH2 is correlated with poor prognosis and metastasis in many cancers. In addition, 3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNep), an S-adenosyl-L homocysteine hydrolase inhibitor which induces EZH2 protein depletion, leads to cell death in several cancers and tumors. The aim of this study was to determine whether an epigenetic therapy targeting EZH2 with DZNep may be also efficient to treat chondrosarcomas.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(5):e98176. · 3.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The majority of patients with chondrosarcoma of bone have an excellent overall survival after local therapy. However, in case of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease the outcome is poor and limited treatment options exist. Therefore we conducted a survey of clinical phase I or II trials and retrospective studies that described systemic therapy for chondrosarcoma patients.
    Clinical sarcoma research. 01/2014; 4:11.