Identification of Disubstituted Sulfonamide Compounds as Specific Inhibitors of Hepatitis B Virus Covalently Closed Circular DNA Formation

Institute for Biotechnology and Virology Research, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Doylestown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (Impact Factor: 4.48). 05/2012; 56(8):4277-88. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00473-12
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) plays a central role in viral infection and persistence and is the basis for viral rebound after the cessation of therapy, as well as the elusiveness of a cure even after extended treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of novel therapeutic agents that directly target cccDNA formation and maintenance. By employing an innovative cell-based cccDNA assay in which secreted HBV e antigen is a cccDNA-dependent surrogate, we screened an in-house small-molecule library consisting of 85,000 drug-like compounds. Two structurally related disubstituted sulfonamides (DSS), termed CCC-0975 and CCC-0346, emerged and were confirmed as inhibitors of cccDNA production, with low micromolar 50% effective concentrations (EC(50)s) in cell culture. Further mechanistic studies demonstrated that DSS compound treatment neither directly inhibited HBV DNA replication in cell culture nor reduced viral polymerase activity in the in vitro endogenous polymerase assay but synchronously reduced the levels of HBV cccDNA and its putative precursor, deproteinized relaxed circular DNA (DP-rcDNA). However, DSS compounds did not promote the intracellular decay of HBV DP-rcDNA and cccDNA, suggesting that the compounds interfere primarily with rcDNA conversion into cccDNA. In addition, we demonstrated that CCC-0975 was able to reduce cccDNA biosynthesis in duck HBV-infected primary duck hepatocytes. This is the first attempt, to our knowledge, to identify small molecules that target cccDNA formation, and DSS compounds thus potentially serve as proof-of-concept drug candidates for development into therapeutics to eliminate cccDNA from chronic HBV infection.

35 Reads
    • "Sulfanilamides are representative of the classes of compounds on the horizon. Promising leads from this series include CCC-0346 (EC 50 = 0.35 lM) and CCC-0975 (EC 50 = 4.55 lM, Fig. 2) that are believed to target the conversion of rcDNA to cccDNA (Cai et al., 2012). Suppressing cccDNA formation represents a new strategy for combating chronic HBV infection and should be of great interest to the drug discovery community. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is a small virus whose genome has only four open reading frames. We argue that the simplicity of the virion correlates with a complexity of functions for viral proteins. We focus on the HBV core protein (Cp), a small (183 residue) protein that self-assembles to form the viral capsid. However, its functions are a little more complicated than that. In an infected cell Cp modulates every step of the viral lifecycle. Cp is bound to nuclear viral DNA and affects its epigenetics. Cp correlates with RNA specificity. Cp assembles specifically on a reverse transcriptase-viral RNA complex or, apparently, nothing at all. Indeed Cp has been one of the model systems for investigation of virus self-assembly. Cp participates in regulation of reverse transcription. Cp signals completion of reverse transcription to support virus secretion. Cp carries both nuclear localization signals and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) binding sites; both of these functions appear to be regulated by contents of the capsid. Cp can be targeted by antivirals - while self-assembly is the most accessible of Cp activities, we argue that it makes sense to engage the broader spectrum of Cp function. This article forms part of a symposium in Antiviral Research on "From the discovery of the Australia antigen to the development of new curative therapies for hepatitis B: an unfinished story." Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Antiviral research 06/2015; 121. DOI:10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.06.020 · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment of chronic hepatitis B remains limited to monotherapy with pegInterferon-alpha or one of 5 different nucleoside analogues (NUC). While viral suppression can be achieved in approximately 95% of patients with new-generation NUCs, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion ranges from only 20% with NUCs to 30% with pegInterferon-alpha. HBsAg loss is achieved in only 10% of patients with both classes of drugs after a follow-up of 5 years. Attempts to improve the response by administering two different NUCs or a combination of NUC and pegInterferon-alpha have been unsuccessful. This situation has led researchers to investigate a number of steps in the HBV replication cycle as potential targets for new antiviral drugs. Novel targets and compounds could readily be evaluated in in vitro and in vivo models of HBV infection. The addition of one or more new drugs to the current regimen should offer the prospect of markedly improving the response to therapy, reducing the future burden of drug resistance, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Antiviral research 11/2012; 96(2):256–259. DOI:10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.09.006 · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic hepatitis B can currently be medically managed with either pegylated interferon-alpha (pegIFN-α) or one of the five nucleos(t)ide analogue Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs) that inhibit the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA polymerase. While pegIFN-α is effective in approximately one-third of the treated patients, the polymerase inhibitors significantly reduce viral load in the vast majority of those treated. However, neither pegIFN-α nor nucleosid(t)e analogues are capable of reliably eliminating the virus and achieving a cure. Moreover, the interferons and polymerase inhibitors are recommended by US, European and Asian professional society practice guidelines for use in only a subset of those infected with HBV. This subset is the population with the greatest levels of circulating viral DNA and abnormal liver function. Although this is the population at the highest risk for cirrhosis and liver cancer, those who fall outside the treatment guidelines, with low levels of viral replication and normal serum ALTs, may also benefit from antiviral therapy. The questions are thus: are new classes of drugs needed to manage chronic hepatitis B? Is a cure possible? Is a cure even necessary? It is therefore important to define the meaning of a cure and determine what the goals of new therapies should be. In this article, we address those questions and propose two operational definitions of medically attainable cures. The first is a "functional cure" based on the clinical outcome, in which the patient's life expectancy becomes the same as that of an individual who has resolved his HBV infection without therapy. Because such an outcome cannot be measured over the short term, we also define an "apparent virological cure," based on the stable off-drug suppression of HBV viremia and antigenemia and the normalization of ALTs and other laboratory tests. We suggest that such a virological cure should be the goal of future therapeutics in all patients with chronic hepatitis B. The extent to which a virological cure predicts a functional cure will only be determined by long-term follow-up.
    Antiviral research 02/2013; 98(1). DOI:10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.01.006 · 3.94 Impact Factor
Show more