Racial Disparities in Intensity of Care at the End-of-Life: Are Trauma Patients the Same as the Rest?

Department of Surgery and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (Impact Factor: 1.1). 05/2012; 23(2):857-74. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0064
Source: PubMed


Medicare data show Blacks and Hispanics use more health care resources in the last six months of life than Whites. We sought to determine if similar differences exist in trauma patients who died following moderate to severe injury.
We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study of 18 Level 1 and 51 non-trauma centers in 12 states to examine racial/ethnic variation in intensity of care and hospital costs.
Blacks were more likely than Whites to receive critical care consultation RR=1.67 (95% CI, 1.22, 2.30), specialty assessments RR=1.44 (95% CI, 1.12, 1.86) and procedures RR=1.22 (95% CI, 1.00, 150). Hispanics were less likely than Whites to have withdrawal-of-care orders, RR=0.72 (95% CI, 0.53, 0.98).
Among patients who die after trauma, Blacks receive higher intensity of care and Hispanics were less likely to have withdrawal of care orders than others. This suggests racial disparities in patient preferences and provider treatment.

7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Racial differences in withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (WMV) have been demonstrated among patients with severe neurologic injuries. We ascertained whether such differences might be accounted for by imbalances in socioeconomic status or disease severity, and whether such racial differences impact hospital mortality or result in greater discharge to long-term care facilities. We evaluated WMV among 1885 mechanically ventilated patients with severe neurologic injury (defined as Glasgow Coma Scale <9), excluding those progressing to brain death within the first 48 hours. Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation was less likely in nonwhite patients (22% vs 31%, P < .001). Nonwhites were younger and were more likely to have Medicaid or no insurance, live in ZIP codes with low median household incomes, be unmarried, and have greater illness severity; but after adjustment for these variables, racial difference in WMV persisted (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.76). Nonwhite patients were more likely to die instead with full support or progress to brain death, resulting in equivalent overall hospital mortality (40% vs 42%, P = .44). Among survivors, nonwhites were more likely to be discharged to long-term care facilities (27% vs 17%, P < .001). Surrogates of nonwhite neurologically injured patients chose WMV less often even after correcting for socioeconomic status and other confounders. This difference in end-of-life decision making does not appear to alter hospital mortality but may result in more survivors left in a disabled state.
    Journal of critical care 10/2013; 29(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.023 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To examine patterns of use of end-of-life care in patients receiving treatment at a large, urban safety-net hospital from 2000 to 2010. Methods: Data from the Parkland Hospital palliative care database, which tracked all consults for this period, were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hospice use, and Cox proportional hazards modeling to examine survival. Results: There were 5,083 palliative care consults over the study period. More patients were Black (41%) or White (31%), and younger than 65 years old (75%). Cancer patients or those who received palliative care services longer were more likely to receive hospice; those who had no form of health care assistance were less likely. There were no racial/ethnic differences in hospice use. Conclusion: In this cohort, there were no racial/ethnic disparities in hospice use. Those who had no form of health care assistance were less likely to receive hospice.
    Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 11/2013; 24(4):1666-75. DOI:10.1353/hpu.2013.0179 · 1.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To provide a description of communication breakdowns and to identify interventions to improve surgical decision making for elderly patients with serious illness and acute, life-threatening surgical conditions. Background: Communication between surgeons, patients, and surrogates about goals of treatment plays an important and understudied role in determining the surgical interventions elderly patients with serious illness receive. Communication breakdowns may lead to nonbeneficial procedures in acute events near the end of life. Methods: We review the available literature on factors that lead to communication challenges and nonbeneficial surgery at the end of life. We use this review to identify solutions for navigating surgical decision making for seriously ill elderly patients with acute surgical conditions. Results: Surgeon, patient, surrogate, and systemic factors-including time constraints, inadequate provider communication skills and training, uncertainty about prognosis, patient and surrogate anxiety and fear of inaction, and limitations in advance care planning-contribute to communication challenges and nonbeneficial surgery at the end of life. Surgeons could accomplish more effective communication with seriously ill elderly patients if they had a structured, standardized approach to exploring patients' preferences and to integrating those preferences into surgical decisions in the acute setting. Conclusions: Improved communication among surgeons, patients, and surrogates is necessary to ensure that patients receive the care that they want and to avoid nonbeneficial treatment. Further research is needed to learn how to best structure these conversations in the emergency surgical setting.
    Annals of Surgery 05/2014; 260(6). DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000721 · 8.33 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications