Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in patients with colon cancer: Results from a large nationwide population database

Department of Surgery, York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
The American surgeon (Impact Factor: 0.82). 06/2012; 78(6):635-41.
Source: PubMed


Laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is a safe and reliable option for patients with colon cancer. This study examined factors associated with LC use and cost differences between LC and open colectomy (OC). Using the Cost & Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database (2008), patients with colon cancer undergoing elective LC or OC were selected. Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess differences between LC and OC. Logistic and multiple regression analysis was used to determine variables associated with LC and predictors of cost. All analysis was weighted. A total of 63,950 patients were identified (LC 8.1%, OC 91.9%). The majority was female (52.7%), white (61.4%), using Medicare (61.1%), and had surgery performed at a large (64.2%), nonteaching (56.9%), urban (87.3%) hospital in the South (37.7%). Mean age was 70 years. On unadjusted analysis, LC was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7 vs 2.4%), fewer complications (18.9 vs 27.1%), shorter length of stay (5 vs 7 days), and lower total charges ($41,971 vs $43,459, all P < 0.001). LC is a less expensive but less popular surgical option for colon cancer. Stage, race, Charlson score, teaching status, location, and hospital size influence the use of a laparoscopic approach. LC is associated with fewer complications and decreased mortality which contribute to its lower cost as compared with OC.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Postoperative complications increase patient morbidity and mortality and are a target for quality improvement programs. The goal of this study was to review the world's literature on postoperative complications in general surgery patients and try to examine the effect of these complications on patient-centered outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of the current literature identified 18 studies on the topic of postoperative complications in general surgery patients. Results: Postoperative complications are common in general surgery patients and contribute to increased mortality, length of stay, and need for an increased level of care at discharge (decline in disposition). Conclusions: Although the concept of patient-centered outcomes is not new, it has not been applied to postoperative complications. It is likely that the effect of complications on length of hospital stay and postoperative discharge reflects an impact of complications on these patient-centered outcomes. Future studies should consider the effect of complications on those outcomes that are most important to the individual patient.
    Journal of Surgical Research 02/2013; 181(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.032 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What will the future hold for minimally invasive colorectal surgery? Colorectal surgeons have been at the forefront of technological progress of this field dating back to the development of endoscopic polypectomy. Progress in laparoscopic and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeries has pointed toward the path to the future. Endoluminal surgery—operating within the lumen of the colon and rectum—exists in the transanal endoscopic microsurgery experience. Transluminal surgery—operating in the abdomen through the wall of another organ—is ideally suited to the colorectum, where the organ of access is also the target organ for surgery. Herein, developments in transluminal surgery are presented along with an outline of challenges and developing solutions, including needlescopic surgery, miniaturized robotics, and the role of magnets. These advancements follow a natural progress of development and are in an early stage but promise an exciting future for colorectal surgery.
    Seminars in Colon [amp ] Rectal Surgery 03/2013; 24(1):61–65. DOI:10.1053/j.scrs.2012.10.014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website ( All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length. Copyright © 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    British Journal of Surgery 03/2013; 100(4):572. DOI:10.1002/bjs.9073 · 5.54 Impact Factor
Show more