Article

Development of a Short-Form Learning Organization Survey: The LOS-27

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, and Massachusetts General Hospital, Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Medical Care Research and Review (Impact Factor: 2.57). 05/2012; 69(4):432-59. DOI: 10.1177/1077558712448135
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite urgent need for innovation, adaptation, and change in health care, few tools enable researchers or practitioners to assess the extent to which health care facilities perform as learning organizations or the effects of initiatives that require learning. This study's objective was to develop and test a short-form Learning Organization Survey to fill this gap. The authors applied exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to data from Veterans Health Administration personnel to derive a short-form survey and then conducted further confirmatory factor analysis and factor invariance testing on additional Veterans Health Administration data to evaluate the short form. Results suggest that a 27-item, 7-factor survey (2 environmental factors, 1 on leadership, and 4 on concrete learning processes and practices) reliably measures key features of organizational learning, allowing researchers to evaluate theoretical propositions about organizational learning, its antecedents, and outcomes and enabling managers to assess and enhance organizations' learning capabilities and performance.

9 Followers
 · 
208 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hospital errors are a seemingly intractable problem and continuing threat to public health. Errors resist intervention because too often the interventions deployed fail to address the fundamental source of errors: organizational safety culture. This review provides an integrative model of how a broad array of previously demonstrated interventions may work together to reduce hospital errors. We identify interventions that enable, enact, or elaborate a culture of safety and suggest their combination constitutes a continuously evolving process, shaping organizational practices, staff engagement in safety enhancing activities, and safety culture to reduce errors over time. Our conceptual model—which is intended to guide future attempts to both study and more effectively create and sustain safety culture—emphasizes that isolated interventions are unlikely to reduce the underlying causes of hospital errors. Instead, reducing errors requires systemic interventions that address enabling, enacting, and elaborating...
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hospital errors are a seemingly intractable problem and continuing threat to public health. Errors resist intervention because too often the interventions deployed fail to address the fundamental source of errors: weak organizational safety culture. This review applies a theoretical model of safety culture that suggests it is a function of interrelated processes of enabling, enacting, and elaborating that can reduce hospital errors over time. In this model, enabling activities help shape perceptions of safety climate, which promotes enactment of safety culture. We then classify a broad array of interventions as enabling, enacting, or elaborating a culture of safety. Our analysis, which is intended to guide future attempts to both study and more effectively create and sustain a safety culture, emphasizes that isolated interventions are unlikely to reduce the underlying causes of hospital errors. Instead, reducing errors requires systemic interventions that address the interrelated processes of safety culture in a balanced manner. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 34 is March 17, 2013. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Public Health 01/2013; DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114439 · 6.63 Impact Factor
  • Anesthesiology 01/2014; 120(4). DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000145 · 6.17 Impact Factor