The Relationship of Sporting Activity and Implant Survivorship After Hip Resurfacing

Joint Replacement Institute, The S. Mark Taper Building, 2200 West Third Street, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.28). 05/2012; 94(10):911-8. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00100
Source: PubMed


The effect of sports on the durability of the prosthesis after hip resurfacing has not been studied, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to correlate sporting activity levels calculated as Impact and Cycle Scores with the survivorship of the hip resurfacing implants.
Four hundred and forty-five patients were surveyed from one to five years after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 48.7 years, and 74% were men. The Impact and Cycle Score included two scores: an Impact Score and a Hip Cycle Score. All patients were also evaluated with the University of California at Los Angeles activity score. Twenty-three patients (twenty-seven hips) underwent revision surgery after they had completed the survey.
The mean duration of follow-up at the time of survey data collection was 1.9 years (range, 1.0 to 4.9 years), and the mean follow-up period was 10.2 years (range, 6.1 to 13.7 years). The mean Impact Score was 28.1 (range, 0 to 128), and the mean Hip Cycle Score was 33 (range, 0 to 144). Positive correlations were found between the University of California Los Angeles activity score and the Impact Score (r = 0.535) or Hip Cycle Score (r = 0.497). After adjustment for femoral component size, body mass index, and femoral defect size, a 10-point increment in Impact Score corresponded to a 37% increase (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.59) in the risk of revision arthroplasty, while a 10-point increment in the Hip Cycle Score increased the risk of revision by 22% (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.41).Patients with an Impact Score of < 50 had a risk of revision 3.8 times lower (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 8.9) than that of the patients with an Impact Score of ≥ 50, with a survivorship rate at eight years of 96.4% (95% confidence interval, 93.6% to 98.0%) compared with 88.8% (95% confidence interval, 74.7% to 95.3%). We found no association between the University of California at Los Angeles activity score and the survivorship of the implants.
High levels of sporting activities can be detrimental to the long-term success of hip resurfacing devices, independently from other risk factors. Patients seeking hip resurfacing are usually young and should limit their involvement in sports to levels that the implant construct will be able to tolerate.

20 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty designs have been used for over a decade. Risk factors for short-term failure include small component size, large femoral head defects, low body mass index, older age, high level of sporting activity, and component design, and it is established there is a surgeon learning curve. Owing to failures with early surgical techniques, we developed a second-generation technique to address those failures. However, it is unclear whether the techniques affected the long-term risk factors. We (1) determined survivorship for hips implanted with the second-generation cementing technique; (2) identified the risk factors for failure in these patients; and (3) determined the effect of the dominant risk factors on the observed modes of failure. We retrospectively reviewed the first 200 hips (178 patients) implanted using our second-generation surgical technique, which consisted of improvements in cleaning and drying the femoral head before and during cement application. There were 129 men and 49 women. Component orientation and contact patch to rim distance were measured. We recorded the following modes of failure: femoral neck fracture, femoral component loosening, acetabular component loosening, wear, dislocation, and sepsis. The minimum followup was 25 months (mean, 106.5 months; range, 25-138 months). Twelve hips were revised. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.0% at 5 years and 94.3% at 10 years. The only variable associated with revision was acetabular component position. Contact patch to rim distance was lower in hips that dislocated, were revised for wear, or were revised for acetabular loosening. The dominant modes of failure were related to component wear or acetabular component loosening. Acetabular component orientation, a factor within the surgeon's control, determines the long-term success of our current hip resurfacing techniques. Current techniques have changed the modes of failure from aseptic femoral failure to wear or loosening of the acetabular component. Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 04/2012; 470(11):3127-33. DOI:10.1007/s11999-012-2347-y · 2.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of total hip arthroplasty in young patients is small but increasing. We analyzed the results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MMHR) in patients aged 40 years or less. In total 74 operations were performed on 64 patients. Mean age at operation was 33.2 years. HHS averaged 92.3 points at latest follow-up, mean UCLA activity was 8.2. Patients with comorbidity evinced lower scores in HHS, in UCLA activity and in quality of life than patients without comorbidities. Eight revisions (10.8 %) were performed, of which seven due to adverse reaction to metal debris. Seven-year survival was 90.5 %. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing in this cohort was excellent, but overall survival was unsatisfactory. Further analysis is required to verify the role of hip resurfacing among young and active patients.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 11/2012; 133(2). DOI:10.1007/s00402-012-1640-2 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Si la reprise des activités sportives douces est compatible avec une arthroplastie totale de hanche, la pratique de sports avec impacts nombreux semble plus problématique et n’est pas autorisée de façon consensuelle. En 2012, il existe deux types d’arthroplastie de hanche pouvant être proposés aux patients souffrant de coxarthrose : une prothèse conventionnelle avec une tige fémorale ou un resurfaçage de hanche sans effraction du canal fémoral. Ce dernier est destiné aux patients jeunes et/ou sportifs afin de leur permettre une reprise d’activités sans restriction. À la lecture de la littérature, il apparaît que les prothèses conventionnelles ne permettent pas une reprise de tous les sports et semblent s’adresser uniquement aux sports à impact faible. En revanche, les taux de reprise sportive à impact élevé observés après implantation d’un resurfaçage de hanche apparaissent excellents et inégalés par des prothèses conventionnelles. La pratique des sports à impact élevé (et/ou à intensité élevée) semble donc compatible avec un resurfaçage de hanche sans qu’aucune étude à long terme n’ait analysé les conséquences de cette activité sur l’usure et/ou le descellement aseptique.
    Journal de Traumatologie du Sport 12/2012; 29(4):231-235. DOI:10.1016/j.jts.2012.10.001
Show more