The measurement of carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin using a non-invasive pulse CO-oximeter.

Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (Impact Factor: 1.97). 05/2012; 182(2-3):88-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.05.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The pulse CO-oximeter (Rad-57 Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA) allows non-invasive and instantaneous measurement of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) and methemoglobin (MetHb) percentage level using a finger probe. However, the accuracy and reliability of the Rad-57 against the gold standard of venous or arterial blood samples have not been clearly established. Thus, the objective of this trial is to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Rad-57 pulse CO-oximeter by comparing it with venous sampling on the same subjects. Nine healthy subjects were subjected to carbon monoxide such that it raised the COHb to 10-14% on two different days and pooled together. The COHb and MetHb were measured with a blood gas-analyzer and simultaneously with the Rad-57 as the COHb increased from 1.4 to 14%. Results were compared using linear regression and a Bland and Altman method comparison. Mean bias and precision for COHb measured with the Rad-57 was -1% and 2.5%, respectively. The mean bias and precision for MetHb measured with the Rad-57 was 0.0% and 0.3%, respectively. The ability to detect a COHb ≥ 10% occurred in 54% of the samples in which COHb was ≥ 10-14%. In conclusion, the Rad-57 provides a reading that is between -6% and +4% of the true COHb value for 95% of all samples. The Rad-57 seems to be a good substitute as a first screening test of COHb when the pulse CO-oximeter reads <15%.

Download full-text


Available from: Gerald Stanley Zavorsky, Jan 05, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article describes promising emerging technologies developed for measuring tissue-level oxygenation or perfusion, each with its own inherent limitations. The end user must understand what the instrument measures and how to interpret the readings. Optical monitoring using near-infrared spectrometry, Doppler shift, and videomicroscopy are discussed in terms of their application at the tissue level. Assessment of the metabolic state of the extracellular space with existing technology and proxy indicators of metabolic status are discussed. Also addressed are potential sources of variation for each technique, and the role that the clinician plays in the proper interpretation of the data.
    Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 09/2014; 26(3):345–356. DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2014.04.003 · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study objective:The RAD-57 pulse CO-oximeter is a lightweight device allowing non-invasive measurement of blood carboxyhemoglobin (SpCO).We assessed the diagnostic value of pulse CO-oximetry, comparing SpCO to standard laboratory blood measurement (COHb) in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning.Methods:This was a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study according to STARD criteria (Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies) in consecutive adult ED patients with suspected CO poisoning. Transcutaneous SpCO was obtained using the RAD-57 simultaneously with blood sampling for laboratory blood gas analysis, with no change to standard management of CO poisoning. Correlation between SpCO and COHb was assessed using Bland and Altman's method. Diagnostic performances of SpCO for the screening of CO poisoning were determined using ROC curve analysis. Blood COHb levels >5% and 10% for non-smokers and smokers respectively were applied as the reference standard.Results:93 patients were included (56 smokers, 37 non-smokers). CO poisoning was diagnosed in 26 patients (28%). SpCO values ranged from 1% to 30%, with a median of 4% (IQR: 2.7 - 7.3). COHb values ranged from 0% to 34%, median: 5% (IQR: 2 - 9). Mean differences between COHb and SpCO values was -0.2% ± 3.3%, with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) [-6.7%, +6.3%] COHb (-0.7%, LOA [-7.7, +6.2] for non-smokers ; +0.6%, LOA [-5.0, +6.2] for smokers). 6% and 9% SpCO provided optimal thresholds for detecting CO poisoning, in smokers and non-smokers respectively.Conclusion:SpCO measurement using the RAD-57 pulse-oximeter cannot be used as a substitute for standard blood COHb measurement. However, non invasive pulse CO-oximetry could be useful as a first-line screening test, enabling rapid detection and management of CO-poisoned patients in the ED.
    Respiratory care 03/2013; 58(10). DOI:10.4187/respcare.02313 · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • Respiratory care 02/2013; 58(2):376-9. DOI:10.4187/respcare.02288 · 1.84 Impact Factor