Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomised controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design.

University Hospital of Hvidovre, Department of Orthopedics, Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
The Bone & Joint Journal (Impact Factor: 2.8). 06/2012; 94(6):787-92. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28781
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a gender-specific high-flexion posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee replacement (TKR) would offer advantages over a high-flex PS TKR regarding range of movement (ROM), 'feel' of the knee, pain and satisfaction, as well as during activity. A total of 24 female patients with bilateral osteoarthritis entered this prospective, blind randomised trial in which they received a high-flex PS TKR in one knee and a gender-specific high-flexion PS TKR in the other knee. At follow-up, patients were assessed clinically measuring ROM, and questioned about pain, satisfaction and daily 'feel' of each knee. Patients underwent gait analysis pre-operatively and at one year, which yielded kinematic, kinetic and temporospatial parameters indicative of knee function during gait. At final follow-up we found no statistically significant differences in ROM (p = 0.82). The median pain score was 0 (0 to 8) in both groups (p = 0.95). The median satisfaction score was 9 (4 to 10) in the high-flex group and 8 (0 to 10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.98). The median 'feel' score was 9 (3 to 10) in the high-flex group and 8 (0 to 10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.66). Gait analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the two prosthetic designs in any kinematic, kinetic or temporospatial parameters. Both designs produced good clinical results with significant improvements in several gait parameters without evidence of any advantage in the gender-specific design.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this meta-analysis was to review published articles that compared gender-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional TKA for short- or long-term outcomes and to determine which implant leads to a better outcome. A systematical electronic search was conducted in the database of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for prospective and retrospective trials. Two investigators independently reviewed articles, and another two authors extracted information from the included studies. The assessment of methodological quality of eligible studies was performed by using the Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed for the outcomes of clinical outcomes including knee society score (KSS), range of motion (ROM), deep infection, overhang of prosthesis, postoperative pain, reoperation rate, and radiolucent line. Five RCTs and one retrospective study with 1,120 TKAs in 717 patients met the inclusion criteria. Gender-specific TKA and conventional TKA could significantly increase ROM and KSS scores postoperatively, but no difference was observed between two groups. In addition, there was no statistical difference between these two implants in terms of deep infection (OR = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.19-4.82, p = 0.97), postoperative pain (OR = 1.05, 95 % CI 0.68-1.61, p = 0.83), reoperation rate (OR = 0.78, 95 % CI 0.21-2.93, p = 0.71), and radiolucent line (OR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.46-2.01, p = 0.91). However, gender-specific TKA significantly reduced the number of patients with overhang of femoral component in comparison with conventional TKA (OR = 0.04, 95 % CI 0.00-0.27, p = 0.001). Despite a lower overhang rate, there was insufficient evidence in favor of gender-specific TKA with regards to KSS score, ROM, deep infection, postoperative pain, reoperation rate, and radiolucent line.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 12/2013; 24(8). DOI:10.1007/s00590-013-1396-6 · 0.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and purpose- There is no consensus regarding the clinical relevance of gender-specific prostheses in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We summarize the current best evidence in a comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between gender-specific prostheses and standard unisex prostheses in female patients. Methods- We used the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Science Citation Index, and Scopus databases. We included randomized controlled trials published up to January 2013 that compared gender-specific prostheses with standard unisex prostheses in female patients who underwent primary TKAs. Results- 6 trials involving 423 patients with 846 knee joints met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 designs regarding pain, range of motion (ROM), knee scores, satisfaction, preference, complications, and radiographic results. The gender-specific design (Gender Solutions; Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, Indiana) reduced the prevalence of overhang. However, it had less overall coverage of the femoral condyles compared to the unisex group. In fact, the femoral prosthesis in the standard unisex group matched better than that in the gender-specific group. Interpretation- Gender-specific prostheses do not appear to confer any benefit in terms of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes for the female knee.
    Acta Orthopaedica 06/2014; DOI:10.3109/17453674.2014.931194 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Knee arthroplasty (KA) is recognized as an effective treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis and up to 90% of patients experience substantial pain relief. There has been no systematic review synthesizing the longitudinal changes in gait following KA. The aims of this systematic review were to determine the effects of KA on (i) frontal plane and (ii) sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic parameters during the stance phase of gait. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, SPORTdiscus (EBSCO), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched until April 10th, 2014. 1,765 articles were identified, of which 19 studies describing 3-dimensional gait analysis pre- and post-KA were included. Study quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently using the Downs and Black checklist. Findings: Following KA, in the frontal plane, the maximum knee adduction angle and external knee adduction moment (KAM) tended to decrease. In the sagittal plane, findings suggest that the maximum knee flexion moment is increased. From the ten studies that included a healthy reference group, it was unclear whether gait variables returned to normal following KA. Interpretation: Overall, it appears that KA results in a decreased peak KAM and maximum knee adduction angles, an increased peak knee flexion moment and inconsistent changes in the peak knee flexion angle. Knowledge gaps remain due to methodological inconsistencies across studies, limited statistical analysis, and largely heterogeneous sample populations. More research is needed to determine whether KA restores gait pattems to normal, or if additional rehabilitation may be needed to optimize gait following surgery for osteoarthritis.
    The Knee 10/2014; 21(6). DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2014.09.009 · 1.70 Impact Factor