How covariant is the galaxy luminosity function?

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Impact Factor: 5.52). 05/2012; 426(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21745.x
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT We investigate the error properties of certain galaxy luminosity function
(GLF) estimators. Using a cluster expansion of the density field, we show how,
for both volume and flux limited samples, the GLF estimates are covariant. The
covariance matrix can be decomposed into three pieces: a diagonal term arising
from Poisson noise; a sample variance term arising from large-scale structure
in the survey volume; an occupancy covariance term arising due to galaxies of
different luminosities inhabiting the same cluster. To evaluate the theory one
needs: the mass function and bias of clusters, and the conditional luminosity
function (CLF). We use a semi-analytic model (SAM) galaxy catalogue from the
Millennium run N-body simulation and the CLF of Yang et al. (2003) to explore
these effects. The GLF estimates from the SAM and the CLF qualitatively
reproduce results from the 2dFGRS. We also measure the luminosity dependence of
clustering in the SAM and find reasonable agreement with 2dFGRS results for
bright galaxies. However, for fainter galaxies, L<L*, the SAM overpredicts the
relative bias by ~10-20%. We use the SAM data to estimate the errors in the GLF
estimates for a volume limited survey of volume V~0.13 [Gpc/h]^3. We find that
different luminosity bins are highly correlated: for L<L* the correlation
coefficient is r>0.5. Our theory is in good agreement with these measurements.
These strong correlations can be attributed to sample variance. For a
flux-limited survey of similar volume, the estimates are only slightly less
correlated. We explore the importance of these effects for GLF model parameter
estimation. We show that neglecting to take into account the bin-to-bin
covariances can lead to significant systematic errors in best-fit parameters.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dark matter haloes are biased tracers of the underlying dark matter distribution. We use a simple model to provide a relation between the abundance of dark matter haloes and their spatial distribution on large scales. Our model shows that knowledge of the unconditional mass function alone is sufficient to provide an accurate estimate of the large scale bias factor. Then we use the mass function measured in numerical simulations of SCDM, OCDM and LCDM to compute this bias. Comparison with these simulations shows that this simple way of estimating the bias relation and its evolution is accurate for less massive haloes as well as massive ones. In particular, we show that haloes which are less/more massive than typical M* haloes at the time they form are more/less strongly clustered than formulae based on the standard Press-Schechter mass function predict.
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 02/1999; · 5.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We introduce a new technique for following the formation and evolution of galaxies in cosmological N-body simulations. Dissipationless simulations are used to track the formation and merging of dark matter halos as a function of redshift. Simple prescriptions, taken directly from semi-analytic models of galaxy formation, are adopted for cooling, star formation, supernova feedback and the merging of galaxies within the halos. This scheme enables us to study the clustering properties of galaxies and to investigate how selection by type, colour or luminosity influences the results. In this paper, we study properties of the galaxy distribution at z=0. These include luminosity functions, colours, correlation functions, pairwise peculiar velocities, cluster M/L ratios and star formation rates. We focus on two variants of a CDM cosmology: a high- density model with Gamma=0.21 (TCDM) and a low-density model with Omega=0.3 and Lambda=0.7 (LCDM). Both are normalized to reproduce the I-band Tully-Fisher relation near a circular velocity of 220 km/s. Our results depend strongly both on this normalization and on the prescriptions for star formation and feedback. Very different assumptions are required to obtain an acceptable model in the two cases. For TCDM, efficient feedback is required to suppress the growth of galaxies low-mass field halos. Without it, there are too many galaxies and the correlation function turns over below 1 Mpc. For LCDM, feedback must be weak, otherwise too few L* galaxies are produced and the correlation function is too steep. Given the uncertainties in modelling some of the key physical processes, we conclude that it is not yet possible to draw conclusions about the values of cosmological parameters from studies of this kind. Further work on global star formation and feedback effects is required to narrow the range of possibilities Comment: 43 pages, Latex, 16 figures included, 2 additional GIF format figures, submitted to MNRAS
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 05/1998; · 5.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The clustering amplitude of galaxies depends on their intrinsic luminosity. We compare the properties of publicly available galaxy formation models with clustering measurements from the two-degree field galaxy redshift survey. The model predictions show the same qualitative behaviour as the data but fail to match the observations at the level of accuracy at which current measurements can be made. We demonstrate that this is due to the model producing too many satellite galaxies in massive haloes. We implement simple models to describe two new processes, satellite-satellite mergers and the tidal dissolution of satellites to investigate their impact on the predicted clustering. We find that both processes need to be included in order to produce a model which matches the observations. Comment: 15 pages, 15 figures, submitted to MNRAS
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 05/2009; · 5.52 Impact Factor


Available from